Skip to main content
Log in

An analysis of contingencies in the appalachian coalfields

  • Articles
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The history of the Appalachian coalfields points to the inescapa-ble conclusion that affluence and deprivation alternate according to the demand for coal in the national economy. Although this process has frequently been described, it has never been adequately or comprehensively conceptualized. If, however, the region is viewed in terms of contingencies selecting responses, it is possible to regard the population as operating according to a variable-interval schedule. Implications of such a schedule and recommendations for redesigning the contingencies are made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bethell, T. N.The Hurricane Creek massacre. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caudill, H.Night cornes to the Cumberlands. Boston: Little, Brown, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caudill, H.My land is dying. New York: Dutton, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, P. F. Social disorganization and reorganization in Harlan County.American Sociological Review, 1949,14, 389–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F.Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, P.The American serfs. New York: Ballantine, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, W. T. Mountain dilemmas: a study in mountain attitudes.Mountain Life and Work, 1936,12, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, I. Their mountain homes bring city dwellers back.Louisville Courier-Journal and Times, July 14, 1974, G1, G16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, J. R., & Thibeault, R. Primary prevention in Appalachian Kentucky: Peer reinforcement of classroom attendance.The Journal of Community Psychology, 1974,2, 260–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R. L. With the Friends in the coalfields.Mountain Life and Work, 1932,8, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, B. The Appalachian Commission: Boon or boondoggle.Louisville Courier-Journal and Times, April 8, 1973, E1, E6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. Mountaineers underground.Mountain Life and Work, 1932,8(a), 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. For many winters to come.Mountain Life and Work, 1932,8(b), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M.Machine age in the hills. New York: MacMillan, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrag, P. Appalachia, again the forgotten land.Saturday Review, January 27, 1968, 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F.Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F.Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Bantam Books, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, P. E.The pursuit of loneliness. Boston: Beacon Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staats, A. W., & Staats, C. K.Complex human behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, J. E.Yesterday's people. Lexington, Ky.: University of Kentucky Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesel, C., & Arny, M. Psychiatric study of coal miners in eastern Kentucky.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1952,108, 617–624.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noonan, J.R. An analysis of contingencies in the appalachian coalfields. Community Ment Health J 12, 99–105 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01435744

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01435744

Keywords

Navigation