Abstract
Postmodernism seriously questions the possibility of the modern project of education, because postmodern relativism seems to undermine the very possibility of justification, bothin and of education. Some educators have therefore concluded that postmodernism is the proclaimed end of education; others hold a more ambivalent stance. Educators in the critical tradition have especially criticized the depoliticizing tendencies of postmodernism.
In this paper it is argued that postmodernism should not be understood as radical relativism, but as the articulation of a tension between contingency and commitment. The concern for radical plurality is identified as the typically postmodern commitment. It is argued that this commitment can also be characterized as a typically pedagogical commitment. Educators, therefore, have at least one strong reason to stay within postmodernism.
In order to explore in what way postmodernism might contribute to the emancipatory interests of education, an overview is given of the feminist debate on postmodernism. This shows that the emancipatory potential of postmodernism can only be put into use by political means. The question the is, what a postmodern politics might look like. An answer to this question is found in the work of Richard Rorty, albeit that the theoretical hard core of his position — the separation between the public sphere and the private sphere — is criticized for its ideological charcter and its rather unpedagogical repercussions. After a reconstruction of the private-public-dichotomy has been given, three consequences for education are spelled out, all of which center around the conclusion that postmodernism inevitably leads to a repoliticization of education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ankersmit, F. (1992). De grondslagenvijandige politieke filosofie van Richard Rorty. In R. Boomkens (Red.),De asceet, de tolk en de verteller, (pp. 58–75) Amsterdam: Stichting voor Filosofies Onderzoek/Krisis.
Aronowitz, S., & Giroux, H.A. (1991).Postmodern education. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Baacke, D., Frank, A., Frese, J., & Nonne, F. (Eds.). (1985).Am ende — Postmodern? Next wave in der pädagogik. Weinheim & München: Juventa.
Barber, B. (1988).The conquest of politics. Liberal philosophy in democratic times Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Beck, C. (1994). Postmodernism, pedagogy, and philosophy of education. In A. Thompson (Ed.),Philosopyh of education 1993, (pp. 1–13). Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.
Bernstein, R.J. (1992).The new constellation. The ethical-politcal horizons of modernity-postmodernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Beyer, L.E., & Liston, D.P. (1992). Discourse or moral action? A critique of postmodernism.Educational Theory,42, 371–393.
Biesta, G.J.J. (1994a). Education as practical intersubjectivity. Towards a critical-pragmaticunderstanding of education.Educational Theory,44, 299–317.
Biesta, G.J.J. (1994b). Pragmatism as a pedagogy of communicative action.Studies in Philosophy and Education,13, 273–290.
Biesta, G.J.J. (in press). Education/Communication: The two faces of communicative pedagogy. In A. Neiman (Ed.),Philosophy of education 1995. Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.
Braidotti, R. (1988). De politiek van de ontologische differentie.Tijdschrift voor Vrouwenstudies,9, 375–389.
Braidotti, R. (1992). Van subject veranderen. Metafysica en metabolisme.Krisis, (no. 46), 53–60.
Brodkey, L. (1987). Postmodern pedagogy for progressive educators.Journal of Education,169, 138–143.
Brooker, P. (Ed.). (1992).Modernism/Postmodernism. London: Longman.
Burbules, N.C. (1993).Dialogue in teaching. Theory and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Burbules, N.C., & Rice, S. (1991). Dialogue across differences: Continuing the conversation.Harvard Educational Review,61, 393–416.
Cherryholmes, C. (1988).Power and criticism. Poststructural investigations in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Dewey, J. (1895). Plan of organization of the university primary school. InJohn Dewey, The early works, 1882–1898. Volume 5: 1895–1898, (pp. 223–243). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Di Stefano, C. (1990). Dilemmas of difference: Feminism, modernity, and postmodernism. In L.J. Nicholson (Ed.),Feminism/Postmodernism, (pp. 63–82). New York: Routledge.
Donald, J. (1992).Sentimental education. Schooling popular culture and the regulation of liberty. London: Verso.
Doll, W.E., Jr. (1993).A post-modern perspective on curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.
Dreyfus, H.L., & Rabinow, P. (1983).Michel Foucalt. Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics., (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Elshtain, J.B. (1992). Don't be cruel: Reflections on Rortyian liberalism. In D.W. Conway & J.E. Seery (Eds.),The politics of irony. Essays in selfbetrayal, (pp. 199–217). New York: Martin's Press.
Flax, J., (1987a). Postmodernism and gender relations in ferminist theory.Signs: Journal of women in culture and society,12, 621–643.
Flax, J. (1987b). Re-membering the Selves: Is the repressed gendered?Michigan Quarterly Review,26, 92–110.
Fraser, N., & Nicholson, L. (1989). Social criticism without philosophy: An encounter between feminism and postmodernism. In A. Ross (Ed.),Universal abandon? The politics of postmodernism, (pp 83–104). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Fritzman, J.M. (1990). Lyotard's paralogy and Rorty's pluralism: Their differences and pedagogical implications.Educational Theory,40, 371–380.
Giroux, H.A. (Ed.) (1991).Postmodernism, feminism, and cultural politics. New York: SUNY Press.
Giroux, H.A. (1992):Border crossings. Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.
Gore, J.M. (1993).The struggle for pedagogies: Critical and feminist discourses as regimes of truth. New York: Routledge.
Habermas, J. (1984). Habermas: Questions and counterquestions.Praxis International,4, 229–249.
Habermas, J. (1985).Die neuen unübersichtlichkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Harding, S. (1986).The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Hebdige, D. (1986). Postmodernism and “The Other Side”.Journal of Communication Inquiry,10, 78–99.
Heyting, F. (1992). De relativiteit van opvoedkundige theorievorming.Comenius,12, 172–195.
hooks, b. (1984).Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston: South End Press.
Huyssen, A. (1986).After the great divide: Modernism, mass culture, postmodernism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Jameson, F. (1991).Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
Kanpol, B. (1992). Postmodernism in education revisited: Similarities within differences and the democratic imaginary.Educational Theory,42, 217–229.
Kiziltan, M.Ü., Bain, W.J., & Cañizares, M. (1990). Postmodern conditions: Rethinking public education.Educational Theory,40, 351–369.
Laclau, E. (1989). Politics and the limits of modernity. In A. Ross (Ed.),Universal abandon? The politics of postmodernism, (pp. 63–82). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Lather, P. (1991).Getting smart. Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1979).La condition postmoderne. Paris: Minuit.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1983).Le différend. Paris: Minuit.
Masschelein, J. (1991a). Die ergebnislose und funktionslose erziehung.Zeitschrift für Pädagogik,37, 65–80.
Masschelein, J. (1991b).Kommunikatives handeln und pädagogischs handeln. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.
Masschelein, J. (1992). Wandel der oeffentlichkeit und das problem der identität.Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, Beiheft 28, 59–75.
McClure, K. (1992). On the subject of rights: Pluralism, plurality and political identity. In C. Mouffe, (Ed.),Dimensions of radical democracy, (pp. 108–127). London: Verso.
McLaren, P. (1986). Review Article—Postmodernity and the death of politics: A Brazilian perspective.Educational Theory,36, 389–401.
McLaren, P. (1991). Schooling the postmodern body: Critical pedagogy and the politics of enfleshment. In H.A. Giroux (Ed.),Postmodernism, feminism, and cultural politics, (pp. 144–173). Albany: SUNY Press.
McLaren, P. (in press). Multiculturalism and the postmodern critique: Towards a pedagogy of resistance and transformation.Cultural Studies.
McLaren, P., & Hammer, R. (1989). Critical pedagogy and the postmodern challenge: Towards a critical postmodernist pedagogy of liberation.Educational Foundations,3, 29–62.
Miedema, S. (1992). The end of pedagogy? A plea for concrete utopian acting and thinking.Phenomenologgy and Pedagogy,10, 28–37.
Miedema, S. (1994). Ethnizität, pluralität und weltbürgerschaft. In H. Sünker, D. Timmerman, & F.-U. Kolbe (Hrsg.),Bildung, gesellschaft, soziale ungleichkeit, (pp. 199–225). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Mollenhauer, J. (1972).Theorieën zum erziehungsprozess. München: Juventa.
Mongardini, C. (1992). The ideology of postmodernity.Theory, Culture & Society,9, 55–65.
Morrow, R.A., & Torres, C.A. (1994). Education and the reproduction of class, gender, and race: Responding to the postmodern challenge.Educational Theory,44, 43–61.
Mouffe, C. (1989). Radical democracy: Modern or postmodern. In A. Ross (Ed.),Universal abandon? The politics of postmodernism, (pp. 31–45). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University press.
Mouffe, C. (1992a). Democratic politics today. In C. Mouffe (Ed.),Dimensions of radical democracy, (pp. 1–16). London: Verso.
Mouffe, C. (1992b). Democratic citizenship and the political community. In C. Mouffe (Ed.),Dimensions of radical democracy, (pp. 225–239). London: Verso.
Nicholson, C. (1989). Postmodernism, feminism, and education: The need for solidarity.Educational Theory,39, 197–205.
Nicholson, L.J. (Ed.). (1990).Feminism/Postmodernism. New York: Routledge.
Oelkers, J. (1987). Die wiederkehr der postmoderne. Pädagogische reflexionen zum neunen fin de siècle.Zeitschrift für Pädagogik,33, 21–40.
Pels, D. (1992). Kennispolitiek. Een gebruiksaanwijzing voor Foucault.Kennis en Methode,16, 39–62.
Pinar, W.F., & Reynolds, W.M. (Eds.). (1992).Understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed text. New York: Teachers College Press.
Poster, M. (1989).Critical theory and poststructuralism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Prins, B. (1992). Passie en paradox van het vrouwelijk subject.Krisis,12, 49–52.
Rang, A. (1988).Pedagogiek en moderniteit. Nijmegen: Sun.
Rorty, R. (1980).Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Rorty, R. (1982).Consequences of pragmatism (Essays: 1972–1980). Brighton: Harvester Press.
Rorty, R. (1985). Solidarity or objectivity? In J. Rajchman, & C. West (Eds.),Post-analytic philosophy, (pp. 3–19). New York: Columbia University Press.
Rorty, R. (1989).Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rorty, R. (1990). The dangers of over-philosophication—Reply to Arcilla and Nicholson.Educational Theory,40, 41–44.
Rorty, R. (1991a).Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Philosphical Papers Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rorty, R. (1991b).Essays on Heidegger and others. Philosophical Papers Volume II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rorty, R. (1992): Robustness: A Reply to Jean Bethke Elshtain. In D.W. Conway & J.E. Seery (Eds.),Politics of irony. Essays in self-betrayal, (pp. 219–223). New York: Martin's Press.
Ross, A. (Ed.) (1989a).Universal abandon? The politics of postmodernism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Ross, A. (1989b). Introduction. In A. Ross (Ed.),Universal abandon? The politics of postmodernism, (pp. vii-xviii). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Schleiermacher, F.D. (1983/1984). In E. von Weniger & T. Schulze (Eds.),Pädagogische schriften (2 Bde.). Frankfurt am Main: Ullstein.
Taylor, C. (1992).Multiculturalism and “The politics of recognition”. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Westbrook, R.B. (1991).John Dewey and American democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Young, R. (1990).A critical theory of education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Biesta, G. Postmodernism and the repoliticization of education. Interchange 26, 161–183 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01435145
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01435145