Skip to main content
Log in

Public education and the post-fordist accumulation regime: A case study of Australia

  • Articles
  • Parts One and Two
  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the current radical changes in the Australian education policy. Central to the argument is the claim that the radical restructuring of the public sector hastened the loss of the possibility of any critical evaluation of national policy.

The paper argues that this shift has been forced on the Australian state by the objective conditions expressed in a new realignment of the dominant transnational capital with the subordinate domestic capital, and in the shifts in a global capacity for consumption. The argument is underpinned by the claim that a new, post-Fordist (or flexible specialization) regime of capital accumulation is at present replacing the Fordist regime of mass production and consumption.

The paper further argues that in order to achieve the system-preferred changes in the Australian education policy, the Australian government introduced radical changes in the production rules of policy formation. This involved a narrowing of policy making context and, crucially, an exclusion of voices critical of the shift towards economic reductionism.

This loss of a critical sensibility constitutes the central concern of this paper. To advance the argument, in Part One, the paper discusses the relationship between the Australian state and the post-Fordist objective conditions of capital accumulation. Part Two argues that the lack of intellectual tradition in Australian public life was at least partially responsible for the easy passage given to neoclassical economics perspective in becoming a dominant public policy paradigm. Part Three locates the role of education within the context of the European philosophical tradition. It provides the link between critical sensibility, the project of Western civilization (which clearly extends beyond the modern vs. postmodern dichotomy), and the role of public discourse. Finally, the paper argues that education policy needs to take the issue of critical sensibility seriously. For this reason, it needs to be informed by a desire to go beyond the mere technical fit between graduates and the workplace, and allow itself to be inspired by new ideas, and new ways of seeing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashenden, D. & Associates. (1991). Progress and prospects in improved skills recognition (National Board of Employment and Training, (NBEET) Commissioned Report No. 10. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barns, I. (1991 November). Post-Fordist people? Cultural meanings of new technoeconomic systems.Futures, 895–915.

  • Baudrillard, J. (1984–1985). Intellectuals commitment and political power. An interview with J. Baudrillard.Thesis Eleven,10/11, 166–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1992). Love in adversity: On the state and the intellectuals, and the state of the intellectuals.Thesis Eleven,31, 81–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. (1992). Structural power in the manufacturing sector: The political economy of competitiveness and investment. In S. Bell & J. Wanna (Eds.),Business-Government Relations in Australia (pp. 37–81). Sydney: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, B. (1986).Managing change in the public sector. A statement of the Government's position. Perth: Government Printer, Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butlin, N.G. (1987).Human or inhuman capital? The economics profession 1916–1987. Department of Economic History, Australian National University, Working Paper No. 91, September, 1987.

  • Campbell, I. (1989). New production concepts? The West German debate on restructuring.Labour & Industry,2(2), 247–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael Report. (1992 March).Employment and skills formation. Council Report commissioned by National Board of Employment, Education and Training, Australian Government Publishing Service. (The Australian Vocational Certificate Training System). Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

  • Carroll, J. & Manne, R. (Eds.). (1992).Shutdown. The failure of economic rationalism and how to rescue Australia. Melbourne: Text.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, F.G. (1988).Australian public policy and economic vulnerability. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, I. (1985–86).Foreign control of exports from Australia, 1985–86. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castoriadis, C. (1992). The retreat from autonomy: Postmodernism as generalezed conformism.Thesis Eleven,31, 14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, P.G. (1980).The changing architecture of politics. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Ch. (1993).Competencies: For and against. Keynote address presented at the Australian Curriculum Studies Association National Conference, Brisbane, Australia, July 1, 1993.

  • Considine, M. (1988). The corporate management framework as administrative science: A critique.Australian Journal of Public Administration,XLVII(1), 4–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs Royal Commission. (1976).Report of the Royal Commission of Australian Government Administration. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crough, G. & Wheelwright, T. (1982).Australia: A client state. Ringwood, VIC: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, R. (1982). Education and the capitalist state: Contributions and contradictions. In M.W. Apple (Ed.),Cultural and economic reproduction in Education: Essays on class, ideology and the state (pp. 127–161). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, A., & Cornwall, J. (1983).A lost generation. Sydney: The Australian Youth Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, J. (1988).Strengthening Australia's schools. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, J. (1990a). Ministerial address. National Board of Employment, Education and Training Conference, Coffs Harbour, Australia, October, 1990.

  • Dawkins, J. (1990b).Employment, education and training Act 1988. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohse, K., Jürgens, U., & Malsch, T. (1985). From “Fordism” to “Toyotism”? The social organization of the labour process in the Japanese automobile industry.Politics and Society,14(4), 115–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, M., & Stilwell, F. (1992). Economic notes: The super-rich in Australia.Journal of Australian Political Economy,30, 141–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbeck, F.N. (1990).Teacher education in Australia: A report to AEC. Canberra: Australian Education Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R. (1979).Contested terrain: The transformation of the workplace in the twentieth century. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, B. (Chair-Finn Report). (1991 July).Young people's participation in post-compulsory education & Training (Report of the Australian Education Council Review Committee). Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.),Power/Knowledge (pp. 109–133). New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984). Le souci de la verité.Magazine Littéraire,22(207), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1988). The masked philosopher. An interview with M. Foucault. In L.D. Kritzman (Ed.),Michel Foucault: Politics, philosophy, culture (pp. 323–330). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1989). On the genealogy of ethics. An interview with M. Foucault. In H.L. Dreyfus, & P. Rabinow (Eds.),Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 229–252). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1930).Civilization and its discontents. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1991a). Civilization and its discontents. In Volume 12,Civilization, society and religion. London: Penguin. (Original work published 1929).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1991b). The future of an illusion. In Volume 12,Civilization, society and religion. London: Penguin. (Original work published 1927).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979).Central problems of society theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. (1980). Stages of accumulation and long economic cycles. In T. Hopkins & I. Wallerstein (Eds.),Processes in the world system (pp. 9–45). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1987).Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeusler, J., & Hirsch, J. (1989). Political regulation: The crisis of Fordism and the transformation of the party system in West Germany. In M. Gottdiener & N. Komninos (Eds.),Capitalist development and crisis theory: Accumulation, regulation and spatial restructuring (pp. 300–327). London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1979).Communication and the evolution of society. London, Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984).The theory of communicative action (Vol. 1). Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989).The condition of postmodemity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, B. (1988). Introduction: Intellectuals in Australian society. In B. Head & J. Walter (Eds.),Intellectual movements and Australian society (pp. 1–44). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1988). Regulation theory, postFordism and the state: More than a reply to Werner Bonefield.Capital & Class,34, 147–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1989). Conservative regimes and the transition to post-Fordism: The cases of Great Britain and West Germany. In M. Gottdiener & N. Komninos (Eds.),Capitalist development and crisis theory: Accumulation, regulation and spatial restructuring (pp. 261–299). London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. (1992). Multinational companies and the balance on current account.Journal of Australian Economy,30, 61–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, H. & Schumann, M. (1987). Limits of a division of labour. New production and employment concepts in West German industry.Economic and Industrial Democracy,8, 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korporaal, G. (1991). Oz goes offshore.Far Eastern Economic Review,151(10), 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. (1993). Corporate federalism: The emerging approach to policymaking for Australian schools. In B. Lingard, J. Knight, & P. Porter (Eds.),Schooling Reform in Hard Times (pp. 24–35). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, A.O. (1966). The principle of plenitude and eighteen-century optimism. In R.M. Adams (Ed.),Voltaire: Candide or optimism (pp. 111–124). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1972).One dimensional man. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, N. (1988). Bureaucratic politics and the demise of the Commonwealth Tertiary Commission.Australian Journal of Public Administration,XLV11(1), 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer Report. (1992a, May).Employment-related key competencies: A proposal for consultation. Melbourne: Australian Government Publishing Service.

  • Mayer Report. (1992b, October).Putting general education to work: The key competencies report. Canberra: Australian Education Council.

  • McCarthy, T. (1978).The critical theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, J. (1991). Education and the market model.Journal of Philosophy of Education,25(2), 209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, H. (1982, July 17). Nation: A magazine which helped us wake from the Great Australian Silence.Sydney Morning Herald, p. 30.

  • Moran, A. (1988). Media intellectuals. In B. Head & J. Walter (Eds.),Intellectual movements and Australian society (pp. 109–126). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, R. & Torres, C. (1994). Education and the reproduction of class, gender and race: Responding to the postmodern challenge.Education Theory,44(1), 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munster, G., Poole, R., Rowse, T., Salleh, A.K., & Smith, T. (1984–1985). Australian intellectuals and the Left — A symposium.Thesis Eleven,10/11, 145–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nethercote, J.R., Kouzmin, A., & Wettenhall, R. (Eds.). (1986).Australian Commonwealth Administration 1984: Essays in review. Canberra: CCAE.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, J. (1973).The fiscal crisis of the state. New York: St. Martin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (1975). The theory of the capitalist state and the problem of policy formation. In L. Lindberg (Ed.),Stress and contradiction in modern capitalism (pp. 125–144). Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (1984). Ungovernability: On the renaissance of conservative theories of crisis. In J. Habermas (Ed.),Observations in the spiritual situation of the age (pp. 67–88). London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (1985).Disorganized capitalism. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1989).Education and the economy in a changing society. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1993, June/July).OECD in figures. Supplement to the OECD Observer,182.

  • Patton, P. (1984–1985). Michel Foucault: The ethics of an intellectual.Thesis Eleven,10/11, 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M.J. (1992). Central banking — A parting view.Reserve Bank of Australia Bulletin, April, 14–19.

  • Pusey, M. (1991).Economic rationalism in Canberra. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S.L. & Soucek, V. (1991, March).Changing social realities in Australian schools: A study of teachers' perceptions and experiences of current reforms. Paper presented at the Comparative and International Education Society Conference in Pittsburgh, PA.

  • Soucek, V. (1993a). Is there a need to redress the balance between system-and lifeworld-orientated goals in public education in Australia? In C. Collins (Ed.),Competencies for and against — The competencies debate in Australian education and training (pp. 162–181). Deakin, ACT: Australian College of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockley, D. (1993). Being productive, being clever: The enchanted forest of intellectual property:Australia Journal of Education,37(1), 96–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stretton, H. (1986). Tasks for social democratic intellectuals. In D. Rawson (Ed.),Blast, budge, or bypass: Towards a social democratic Australia (pp. 14–39). Canberra: Academy of Social Sciences in Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taskforce Report. (1990).Good teachers make good schools. Perth, WA: Western Australian Ministry of Education.

  • Triado, J. (1984). Corporatism, democracy and modernity.Thesis Eleven,9, 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, R., Williams, I., & Stanley, G (1993).Review of education and training. Perth, WA: The Western Australian Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (1988). The modern world-system as a civilization.Thesis Eleven,20, 70–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, P. (1983).Critical social psychology. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, D. (1973). Education and capitalism. In J. Playford & D. Kirsner (Eds.),Australian capitalism (pp. 219–247). Ringwood: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiltshire, K. (1986).Planning and federalism: Australian and Canadian experience. Brisbane: The University of Queensland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xenos, N. (1987). Liberalism and the postulate of scarcity.Political theory,15(2), 225–243.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soucek, V. Public education and the post-fordist accumulation regime: A case study of Australia. Interchange 26, 127–159 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01435144

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01435144

Keywords

Navigation