Virtual Reality

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 60–73 | Cite as

Constructing social systems through computer-mediated communication

Article

Abstract

The question of whether computer-mediated communication can support the formation of genuine social systems is addressed in this paper. Our hypothesis, that technology creates new forms of social systems beyond real-life milieus, includes the idea that the technology itself may influence how social binding emerges within online environments. In real-life communities, a precondition for social coherence is the existence of social conventions. By observing interaction in virtual environments, we found the use of a range of social conventions. These results were analysed to determine how the use and emergence of conventions might be influenced by the technology. One factor contributing to the coherence of online social systems, but not the only one, appears to be the degree of social presence mediated by the technology. We suggest that social systems can emerge by computer-mediated communication and are shaped by the media of the specific environment.

Keywords

Collaborative virtual environments Social conventions Virtual communities Social presence Avatars 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baym NK. The emergence of community in computer-mediated communication. In: CyberSociety. Jones S. ed. Thousands Oaks, London, 1995Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reid E. Communication and community on Internet Relay Chat: constructing communities. In high noon on the electronic frontier. Ludlow P ed. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1996Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Poster M. The second media age. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wellman B, Gulia M. Net surfers don't ride alone: virtual communities as communities. In: Communities in cyberspace. Kollock P, Smith M, eds. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1998Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jones S ed. CyberSociety. Thousands Oaks, London, 1995Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lyons D. Cyberspace-Sozialität: Kontroversen über computervermittelte Beziehungen. In: Medien — Welten Wirklichkeiten. Vattimo G, Welsch, W eds. Munich, 1997Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Waldenfels B. Der Stachel des Fremden. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1994Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duncan S, Fiske DW. Face-to-face interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J., 1977Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Giddens A. The consequences of modernity. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1990Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Honneth A ed. Kommunitarismus. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1994Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schulze G. Die Erlebnisgesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1992Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Habermas J. Faktizität und Geltung. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1992Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lyotard JF. Das postmoderne Wissen. Wien, PasagenVerlag 1986Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bourdieu P. Die feinen Unterschiede. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1987Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kollock P, Smith M eds. Communities in cyberspace. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1998Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kollock P. Design principles for online communities. In: The Internet and society: Harvard Conference Proceedings. O'Reilly and Associates, Cambridge, Mass., 1996Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Opielka M. Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft, unveröffentl. Dissertation. Bonn, 1996Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Taylor C. Aneinander vorbei: Die Debatte zwischen Liberalismus und Kommunitarismus. In: Kommunitarismus. Honneth A ed. Frankfurt, 1994Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Habermas J. Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns, vol 2. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1981Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Waldenfels B. In den Netzen der Lebenswelt. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1985Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kemmerling A. ‘Regeln’. In: Handbuch wissen-schaftstheoretischer Begriffe. Speck J ed. UTB, Göttingen, 1980Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Winch P. Die Idee der Sozialwissenschaft und ihr Verhältnis zur Philosophie. Frankfurt, 1966Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wellmer A. Zur Dialektik von Moderne und Postmoderne. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1984Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wittgenstein L. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1960Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bowers J, Pycock J, O'Brien J. Talk and embodiment in collaborative virtual environments. In: Proceedings of CHI'96. ACM Press, New York, 1996Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bowers J, O'Brien J, Pycock J. Practically accomplishing immersion: cooperation in and for virtual environments. In: Proceedings of CSCW'96. ACM Press, New York, 1996: 380–389Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Greenhalgh C. Analysing movement and world transitions in virtual reality tele-conferencing. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on CSCW. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1995: 313–328Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Benford S, Greenhalgh C, Snowden D, Bullock A. Staging a public poetry performance in a collaborative virtual environment. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on CSCW. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1995: 125–140Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Donath J. Identity and deception in the virtual community. In: Communities in Cyberspace. Kollock P, Smith M eds. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1998Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Curtis P. Mudding: social phenomena in text-based virtual realities. In: Internet dreams: archetypes, myths, and metaphors. Stcfik M. ed. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1996: 265–292Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Geertz C. Dichte Beschreibung. Beiträge zum Verstehen kultureller Systeme.: Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1983Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Scheflen AE. Models and epistemologies in the study of interaction. In: Organization of behaviour in face-to-face interaction. Kendon A, Harris RM, Key MR eds. Mouton, The Hague, 1990: 63–91Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Becker B, Mark G. Social conventions in collaborative virtual environments. In: Proceedings of Collaborative Virtual Environments 1998 (CVE'98), Manchester, 1998Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Goffman E. Forms of talk. Blackwell, Oxford, 1981Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lyman SM, Scott MB. Territoriality: a neglected sociological dimension. Social Problems 1967; 15: 236–249Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cheyne JA, Efran MG. The effect of spatial and interpersonal variables on the invasion of group controlled territories. Sociometry 1972 35: 477–489Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Moreland RL, Levine JM.. Newcomers and oldtimers in small groups. In: Psychology of group influence. Paulus P ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J., 1989: 143–186Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kauppinen K, Kivimaki A, Era T, Robinson M. Producing identity in collaborative virtual environments. In: VRST'98, Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan. ACM Press, New York, 1998Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hall ET. The hidden dimension. Anchor Books, New York, 1966Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dosey MA, Meisels M. Personal space and self-protection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1969; 11: 93–97Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jeffrey P, Mark G. Social navigation and personal space: an empirical study in virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Personalised and Social Navigation in Information Space (IFIP WG13.2), Stockholm (SICS Technical Report T98:02, 1998). Swedish Institute of Computer Science (SICS), Stockholm 1998: 24–38Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Short J, Williams E, Christie B. The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley, Chichester, 1976Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lombard M, Ditton T. At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 1997: 3(2)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Card SK, Moran TP, Newell A. The psychology of human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J., 1983Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Harrison S, Dourish P. Re-Place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In: Proceedings of the ACM 1996 CSCW Conference, Boston, Mass. Ackerman M ed., 1996Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Roberts TL. Are news-groups virtual communities? In: Proceedings of CHI'98, Los Angeles, 1998: 360–367Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Carroll JM, Thomas JC. Metaphors and the cognitive representation of computing systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1982: SMC-12(2)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Knorr Cetina K. Sozialität mit Objekten In: Technik und Sozialtheorie. Rammert W ed. Frankfurt, 1998Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.German National Research Centre for Information TechnologySankt AugustinGermany

Personalised recommendations