Skip to main content
Log in

Conflicting views on the importance of emotion to human development and growth: Piaget and Whitehead

  • Symposium
  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I analyse the concept of emotion on Jean Piaget's theory of development and Alfred North Whitehead's theory of growth. For Piaget, emotion is the motivating force of action emanating from outside the individual in the form of sensations emitted by objects. His view is rooted in the Newtonian conception of a universe comprised of isolated objects requiring an emotive force to initiate a series of mechanistic interactions between objects. Piaget reduces all conscious human experience to a cognitive formulation of these causal relations. His abstract concept of emotion as force fails to explain the relationship between bodily feelings, emotions, and higher forms of consciousness in human beings. Conversely, Whitehead explains that emotions are the crucial mediating factors between the welter of awareness of these feelings in higher organisms. His view is consistent with the new physics and its emphasis on indeterminacy, energy, and the organic relationship among events. Whitehead's concrete concept of emotion gives insight into the experience of bodily feelings and their relationship to the growth and learning of human beings. The implications of these conflicting views of emotion for psychology and education are clear. Psychologists must avoid the reductionist tendencies illustrated in Piaget's theory if they hope to understand the subtleties of human experience. Failing to do this will lead them to a concept of human growth and learning in which ideas have no internal relationship with the experience of the knower. Such a conception distorts our understanding of human beings and ignores the joy of knowing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ausubel, D.P. (1968).Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D.P., Novak, J.D., & Hanesian, H. (1978).Educational psychology: A cognitive view. (2nd ed.) Toronto: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringuier, J.C. (1980).Conversations with Jean Piaget. London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, M. (1993), The need for a process perspective in the study of ‘learning disabilities’.Process Papers. Association for Process Philosophy of Education, Belle Mead, NJ, pp. 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1977). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. In H.E. Gruber & J.J. Voneche (Eds.).,The essential Piaget: An interpretive reference and guide (pp. 405–444). New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1955)

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J.D., & Gowin, D.B. (1984).Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1954).The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1977a). The first year of life of the child. In H.E. Gruber & J.J. Voneche (Eds.).,The essential Piaget: An interpretive reference and guide (pp. 198–214). New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1927)

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1977b). The origins of intelligence in children. In H.E. Gruber & J.J. Voneche (Eds.).,The essential Piaget: An inter-pretive reference and guide (pp. 215–249). New York: Basic Books. (Original work published, 1936)

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1977c). Conservation of information and anticpation. In H.E. Gruber & J.J. Voneche (Eds.),The essential Piaget: An interpretive reference and guide (pp. 789–802). New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Oleron, P., Piaget, J., Inhelder, B., & Greco, P. (1977). Intellectual operations and their development. In H.E. Gruber & J.J. Voneche (Eds.),The essential Piaget: In interpretive reference and guide (pp. 347–348). New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, (1993).Malicorne: Earthly reflections of an astrophysicist. Toronto: Stoddart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, E.V. (1981). The career and legacy of Jean Piaget.Queen's Quarterly,88(2), pp. 341–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, E.V. (1990).Critical psychology and pedagogy: Interpretation of the personal world. Toronto: OISE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E.L. (1912).Education a first book. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E.L., & Gates, A.I. (1930).Elementary principles of education. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J.B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it.Psychological Review,20(2), pp. 158–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. (1942).The aims of education and other essays. London: Williams & Norgate. (Original work published 1932)

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. (1967a).Science and the modern world. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1925)

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. (1967b).Adventures of ideas. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1933)

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. (1978).Process and reality: An essay in cosmology. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1929)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flynn, M. Conflicting views on the importance of emotion to human development and growth: Piaget and Whitehead. Interchange 26, 365–381 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01434742

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01434742

Keywords

Navigation