Skip to main content
Log in

Towards a process theory of learning: Feeling the beauty of the world

  • Symposium
  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Alfred North Whitehead's theory of learning is best understood in the overall context of his process philosophy. The “rhythmic cycles of growth” forming the basis of human learning (romance, precision, and generalisation) are organically connected to the “characteristics of life” typifying all entities in the universe (self-enjoyment, creative activity, and aim).

The kind of balanced education which best enhances growth and connectedness is one in which art and aesthetic appreciation in the broadest sense are dominant. By experiencing the beauty of the sunset, for example, children and adults have access to feelings that flow through them from the world and connect them to distant events taking place in space and time. These bodily feelings at the base of all experience provide concrete ways in which human beings can appreciate the intrinsic value of the world around them.

By way of contrast, the methods of 17th century science replace our concrete experience of the sunset with abstract categories that are used to measure the phenomena in question and deny the importance of that experience in understanding the world. Schools' and universities' emphasis upon this methodology produces an imbalanced education with “minds in a groove.”

A renewal of balance in education helps us to understand the false dichotomy between child-centered and and curriculum-centered education. Education for Whitehead must pay attention to both. Moreover, he understands that the academic freedom enjoyed by “bands of imaginative scholars” in universities “is not an article of commerce” to be sold to the highest corporate bidder but something to be valued for its intrinsic worth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrow, R. (1978).Radical education. London: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, R. (1979).The Canadian curriculum. London, ON: Faculty of Education, University of Western Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, R. (1990).Understanding skills. London, ON: Althouse College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, J. (1993). La cosmologie transcendantale de Whitehead: transformation spéculative du concept de construction logique.Archives de Philosophie,56(1), 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumbaugh, R.S. (1992). Whitehead and a new look at teaching elementary science.Interchange,23(3), 245–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumbaugh, R.S. (1982).Whitehead, process philosophy, and education. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane D. (Ed). (1987).So much for the mind. Toronto: Kagan and Woo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crittenden, B. (Ed). (1969).Means and ends in education. Toronto: OISE Occasional Papers, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, J. (1969). Education or molasses?. Ancaster: Cromlech Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drainie, B. (1994, January 29). The fluctuating fate of arts in our schools.The Globe and Mail, p. D4.

  • Egan, K. (1990).Romantic understanding. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evernden, N. (1993).The natural alien. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (Original work published 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennell, T. (1993, January 11). What's wrong at school?Maclean's,106(2), 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowin, B. (1993, April).Remarks on the nature of learning. Trustees Meeting. The Association of Process Philosophy of Education Annual Meeting. The American Philosophical Association (Central Division) Annual Conference. Chicago.

  • Hager, P. (1993/94). Why Russell didn't think he was a philosopher of education.Russell, New Series,13(2), 150–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E.M. & Dennis, L.A. (1968).Living and learning. Toronto: Ontario Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, W. (1987). Russell's contribution to philosophy of education.Russell, New Series,7(1), 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendley, B. (1986).Dewey, Russell, Whitehead: Philosophers as educators. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, R.S. (1936, November). A reply to Professor Whitehead.Atlantic Monthly 158, 582–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A.H. (1952).Whitehead's theory of reality. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A.H. (1962).Whitehead's philosophy of civilization. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, C. (1986).From a broken web. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, S.K. (1982).Philosophy in a new key. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1942)

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, A.W. (1937). The problem of higher education: Whitehead and Hutchins.Harvard Educational Review,7(4), 451–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martell, G. (1974). The schools, the state and the corporations. In G.Martell (Ed),The politics of the Canadian public school (pp. 1–36). Toronto: James Lewis and Samuel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattai, B. (1990/91). Education and the emotions: The relevance of the Russellian perspective.Russell, New Series,10(2), 141–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neatby, H. (1953).So little for the mind. Toronto: Clarke Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, D.W. & Gershman, K. (1989).Education, modernity, and fractured meaning. Albany State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passmore, J. (1966).A hundred years of philosophy. London: Gerald Duckworth. (Original work published 1957)

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1969).Psychology of intelligence. Totowa, N.J.: Littlefield, Adams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1976). Biology and cognition. In B. Inhelder & H. Chipman (Eds).Piaget and his school. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1916).Principles of social reconstruction. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolz, J. (1994). The idea of structureless points and Whitehead's critique of Einstein. In D. Prawitz & D. Westerstahl (Eds),Logic and philosophy of science in Uppsala (pp. 325–332). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. (1927).Symbolism: Its meaning and effect. New York: Capricorn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. (1936, September). Harvard: The future.Atlantic Monthly,158, 260–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. (1948). Historical changes.Essays in science and philosophy. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. (1953).Science and the modern world. New York. The Free Press. (Original work published 1925)

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. (1957a).Process and reality. New York: The Free Press. (Original work published 1929)

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. (1957b).The aims of education. New York: The Free Press. (Original work published 1929)

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. (1961).Adventures of ideas. New York: The Free Press. (Original work published 1933)

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. (1966).Modes of thought New York: The Free Press. (Original work published 1938)

    Google Scholar 

  • Winchester, I. (1986). The future of a mediaeval institution: The university in the twenty-first century. In W.A.W. Nielson & C. Gaffield (Eds),Universities in crisis: A mediaeval institution in the twenty-first century, (pp. 269–290). Montreal: The Institute for Research on Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, H. (1983). The concept of growth in Bertrand Russell's educational thought.The Journal of Educational Thought,17(1), 12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, H. (1987). More than mere musings: Russel's reflections on education as philosophy.Russell, New Series,7(2), 176–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, H. (1992). Northrop Frye on academic freedom: A critique.Interchange,23(1–2), 71–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, H. (1992/93). Russell and Whitehead on the process of growth in education.Russell. New Series.12(2), 135–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, H. (1994, avril). The rhythm of university education.Communications du colloque, Les rythmes éducatifs dans la philosophie de Whitehead. Université Catholique de Lille, Centre de Recherches et d'Etudes en Sciences de l'Education, 1–41.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woodhouse, H. Towards a process theory of learning: Feeling the beauty of the world. Interchange 26, 347–364 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01434741

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01434741

Keywords

Navigation