Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of divorce on the family

  • Articles
  • Published:
Child Psychiatry and Human Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Often, divorce does not end disturbed marital relationships. Of 105 families that experienced divorce, 52 percent had hostile postdivorce interactions requiring at least 1 court intervention, and 31 percent required 2 to 10 court interventions in a two-year follow-up period. The legal reasons for the court actions centered around money and children. Commonly observed family dynamic patterns included (a) hostile interaction between divorced spouses over the parenting roles; (b) continued conflict between divorced spouses, but not involving the children or extended family; (c) perpetuation by the children of interaction between their divorced parents; (d) special alliances between one parent and child against the other parent; and (e) continued interaction of divorced partners, perpetuated by the extended family.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benstein NR, Robey JS: The detection and management of pediatric difficulties created by divorce.Pediat 30:950–56, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brun G: The children of divorce in Denmark.Bull Menninger Clin 28:3–10, 1964.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Buchinal L: Characteristics of adolescents from unbroken, broken, and reconstituted families.Marriage & Fam 26:44–51, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Despert JL:Children of Divorce. New York, Doubleday, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goode WJ:Women in Divorce. New York, Free Press Paperback, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Otterstrom E: The social outlook for children of divorcées.Acta Genetica 3:72–96, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  7. United States Bureau of the Census:Statistical Abstract of the U.S., vol 91. Washington, DC, United States Government Printing Office, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Broel-Pateris AA: Divorce statistic analysis.Vital Health Statistics 21:1–56, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Warkenton J, Whitaker C: Sexual impasses in marriage. Psychiatric Research Report no 20, American Psychiatric Association, 1966.

  10. Zeigarnik B: Uber das Behalten von erledigten und unerledigten Handlungen.Psychol Forsch 9:1–85, 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ovsiankina M: Die Wiederaufnahme Brochener Handlungen.Psychol Forsch 11:302–79, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boguslavsky GW, Guthrie ER: The recall of complete and interrupted activities: An investigation of Zeigarnik's experiment.Psychol Bull 38:575–76, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prentice WCH: The interruption of tasks.Psychol Rev 51:329–40, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of Mrs. Burl Sutton, A.C.S.W., Dane County Family Court Counseling Service, Madison, Wisconsin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cline, D.W., Westman, J.C. The impact of divorce on the family. Child Psych Hum Dev 2, 78–83 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01434640

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01434640

Keywords

Navigation