Abstract
Often, divorce does not end disturbed marital relationships. Of 105 families that experienced divorce, 52 percent had hostile postdivorce interactions requiring at least 1 court intervention, and 31 percent required 2 to 10 court interventions in a two-year follow-up period. The legal reasons for the court actions centered around money and children. Commonly observed family dynamic patterns included (a) hostile interaction between divorced spouses over the parenting roles; (b) continued conflict between divorced spouses, but not involving the children or extended family; (c) perpetuation by the children of interaction between their divorced parents; (d) special alliances between one parent and child against the other parent; and (e) continued interaction of divorced partners, perpetuated by the extended family.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benstein NR, Robey JS: The detection and management of pediatric difficulties created by divorce.Pediat 30:950–56, 1962.
Brun G: The children of divorce in Denmark.Bull Menninger Clin 28:3–10, 1964.
Buchinal L: Characteristics of adolescents from unbroken, broken, and reconstituted families.Marriage & Fam 26:44–51, 1964.
Despert JL:Children of Divorce. New York, Doubleday, 1953.
Goode WJ:Women in Divorce. New York, Free Press Paperback, 1965.
Otterstrom E: The social outlook for children of divorcées.Acta Genetica 3:72–96, 1952.
United States Bureau of the Census:Statistical Abstract of the U.S., vol 91. Washington, DC, United States Government Printing Office, 1970.
Broel-Pateris AA: Divorce statistic analysis.Vital Health Statistics 21:1–56, 1965.
Warkenton J, Whitaker C: Sexual impasses in marriage. Psychiatric Research Report no 20, American Psychiatric Association, 1966.
Zeigarnik B: Uber das Behalten von erledigten und unerledigten Handlungen.Psychol Forsch 9:1–85, 1927.
Ovsiankina M: Die Wiederaufnahme Brochener Handlungen.Psychol Forsch 11:302–79, 1928.
Boguslavsky GW, Guthrie ER: The recall of complete and interrupted activities: An investigation of Zeigarnik's experiment.Psychol Bull 38:575–76, 1941.
Prentice WCH: The interruption of tasks.Psychol Rev 51:329–40, 1944.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of Mrs. Burl Sutton, A.C.S.W., Dane County Family Court Counseling Service, Madison, Wisconsin.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cline, D.W., Westman, J.C. The impact of divorce on the family. Child Psych Hum Dev 2, 78–83 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01434640
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01434640