Abstract
The PARI, MMPI, F-Scale, and Dogmatism Scale were administered to (a) parents of child psychiatric patients, (b) psychotherapists, and (c) child care workers. Similarities and differences among these three groups were found on measures of hostility and control in child-rearing, general authoritarianism and dogmatism, anxiety, repression, dominance, and ego-strength. The findings have important implications for increased understanding of (a) interpersonal relations among adults collaborating in the treatment process, and (b) interactions between adults in these roles and children under their guidance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mussen PD, Conger JJ, Kagan JChild Development and Personality. New York, Harper & Row, 1963.
Sears RR, Maccoby E, Levin HPatterns of Child Rearing. New York, Harper & Row, 1957.
Whiting JWM, Child ILChild Training and Personality. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1953.
Schaefer EA, Bell RQ Development of a parental attitude research instrument.Child Dev.29: 331–361, 1958.
Davids A, Holden RH, Gray GB Maternal anxiety during pregnancy and adequacy of mother and child adjustment eight months following childbirth.Child Develop. 34: 993–1002, 1963.
Hathaway SR, McKinley JCThe Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Manual (Revised). New York, The Psychological Corporation, 1951.
Dahlstrom WG, Welsh GSAn MMPI Handbook: A Guide tp Use in Clinical Practice and Research. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1960.
Adorno TW, Frenkel-Brunswik E, Levinson DJ, Sanford RNThe Authoritarian Personality. New York, Harper & Row, 1950.
Rokeach MThe Open and Closed Mind. New York, Basic Books, 1960.
Welsh GS, Dahlstrom WGBasic Readings on the MMPI in Psychology and Medicine. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1956.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davids, A. Personality and attitudes of child care workers, psychotherapists, and parents of children in residential treatment. Child Psych Hum Dev 1, 41–49 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01434588
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01434588