Skip to main content
Log in

A selective comparison of psychological, developmental, social, and academic factors among emotionally disturbed children in three treatment settings

  • Articles
  • Published:
Child Psychiatry and Human Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was undertaken to determine whether there were significant differences among three groups of emotionally disturbed children in Massachusetts: children in private residential schools; children in private day schools; and children in special classes for the emotionally disturbed in public schools. The subjects involved in the study consisted of three groups of children who were evaluated as being emotionally disturbed and whose initial enrollments in the respective programs were accomplished during the 1972–1973 school year. This represented 129 children enrolled in private day schools, 72 children enrolled in private residential schools, and 309 children enrolled in public school special classes for the emotionally disturbed. Data for these populations were obtained from the records for each of the children on file at the Massachusetts Department of Education, Division of Special Education. This included data on psychiatric diagnosis, IQ, parental separation, geographical location, family income, family social position, and assessment of the child's physical well-being. In addition, two tests were administered to all subjects: The Rutter Child Behavior Scale was completed by each child's classroom teacher, and the Wide Range Achievement Test was administered by the professional having the responsibility for psychometric testing in the respective school.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Conners JE:Special Educational Needs of Emotionally Disturbed Children. Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, Community Health Monograph Series, 1969.

  2. Hoffman HJ:Take a Giant Step. Boston, Massachusetts Advisory Council on Education, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blatt BB:Massachusetts Study of Educational Opportunities for Handicapped and Disadvantaged Children. Boston, Massachusetts Advisory Council on Education, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stotsky BA:The emotionally disturbed child and the special school. Boston, Massachusetts Department of Education, Division of Special Education, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stotsky BA, Browne T, Philbrick WA Jr: A study of outcome of special schooling of emotionally disturbed children.Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 4: 131–150, 1974.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stotsky BA, Townes BD, Martin DC, Browne T: Emotionally disturbed children in special schools: An analysis of ratings of disturbed behavior and perceptual handicaps.Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 6:81–88, 1975.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jastak JF, Jastak SR:Wide Range Achievement Test: Manual of Instructions. Wilmington, Del, Guidance Associates, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rutter M: A children's behavior questionnaire for completion by teachers: Preliminary findings.J Child Psychol Psychiatry 8:1–11, 1967.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rutter M, Tizard J:Education, Health and Behavior. New York, Wiley, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rutter M, Graham P: Psychiatric disorder in ten and eleven year old children.Proc R Soc Med 59:382–387, 1966.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Browne TH:A Study of Selected Psychological, Sociological, and Academic Factors Among Emotionally Disturbed Children in Three Treatment Programs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston College, 1974.

  12. Arnold C, Wagner K: A comparison of Wechsler Children's Scale and Stanford-Binet Scores for eight and nine year-olds.J Exp Education 24:91–94, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harlow JE, Price AC, Tatham LJ, Davidson JL: Preliminary study of comparison between W. I.S.C. and Form L Revised Stanford-Binet at three age levels.J Clin Psychol 13:72–73, 1957.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Holland A: A comparison of the W.I.S.C. and the Stanford-Binet I.Q.'s of normal children.J Consult Psychol 17:147–152, 1953.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Warriner M:A Comparison of Test Performances of Dull Children on the Revised Stanford-Binet and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Chicago, 1952.

  16. Wagner RF, McCloy F:Two Validity Studies of the Wide Range Achievement Test. Richmond, Va, Virginia Academy of Science, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schaie K: A study of the Wide Range Achievement Test.Public Health Services Bulletin 1000, Series 2, Number 24, 1967.

  18. Thorndike RL: Review of wide range achievement test. In OK Buros (Ed),7th Mental Measurement Yearbook. New York, Graph Press, 1972, pp. 36–37.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hollingshead A: Commentary on “The indiscriminate state of social class measurement”.Soc Forces (University of North Carolina)49(4):563–567, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hollingshead A, Redlich F:Social Class and Mental Illness: A Community Study. New York, Wiley, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  21. American Psychiatric Association:Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rosen BM, Kramer M, Redick R, Willner S:Analytic and Special Studies Reports: Utilization of Psychiatric Facilities by Children, Current Status, Trends, Implications. Bethesda, Md, National Institutes of Mental Health, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Beiser M: The etiology of mental disorders: Socio-cultural aspects. In BB Wolman (Ed),Manual of Child Psychopathology. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1972, pp. 150–188.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Joint Commission on the Mental Health of Children.Crisis in Child Mental Health: Challenge for the 1970's. New York, Harper & Row, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Crescimbini J: Broken homes affect academic achievement.Education 84: 437–441, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Couch S:Data Text Primer, An Introduction to Computerized Data Analysis. New York, Free Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Morse WC, Cutler RL, Fink AH:Public School Classes for the Emotionally Disturbed: A Research Analysis. Washington, DC, Council for Exceptional Children, NEA, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schroeder LB: A study of the relationships between five descriptive categories of emotional disturbance and reading and arithmetic achievement.Except Child 32:112–113, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  29. United States Bureau of the Census.Subject Reports, Household and Family Characteristics, Massachusetts, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, 1970, Table 22, p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The assistance of Drs. D. Donley, L. Gomes, and R. Nuttall and Mr. R. St. Pierre, Ms. M. Beinar, and Ms. J. Breed is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Browne, T., Stotsky, B.A. & Eichorn, J. A selective comparison of psychological, developmental, social, and academic factors among emotionally disturbed children in three treatment settings. Child Psych Hum Dev 7, 231–253 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01433933

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01433933

Keywords

Navigation