Skip to main content
Log in

Polymer-cement shotcrete at the construction of the Dangara hydraulic tunnel

  • Published:
Hydrotechnical Construction Aims and scope

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    Polymer-cement shotcrete (gunite) has a number of advantages in comparison with ordinary shotcrete — increased elasticity (low modulus of deformation), high impermeability and adhesiveness to rocks and concrete, resistance to corrosive effects, nontoxicity of the polymer used, and simplicity of the technology of adding latex to the coating material.

  2. 2.

    The addition of polymer makes it possible to reduce the thickness of the coating by at least half while preserving the strength and operating characteristics of the support, which provides a high cost effectiveness of using polymer-cement shotcrete.

  3. 3.

    It is expedient to recommend the wide use of highly effective polymer-cement compositions on a base of synthetic latex SKS-65GP in hydrotechnical construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. Yu. Z. Zaslavskii and V. M. Mostkov, Support of Underground Structures [in Russian], Nedra, Moscow (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. V. Rukin, V. A. Davidov, N. V. Dmitriev, S. Ja. Lashenov, H. N. Nasredinov, and I. E. Kim, “Polymer-cement concrete and shotcrete in hydraulic engineering,” in: Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress on Polymers in Concrete, Brighton (1987).

  3. T. Kono, “Properties of polymer-modified mortar and concrete,” Concrete Journal,11, No. 4, 18–23 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yu. S. Cherkinskii, Polymer-Cement Concrete [in Russian], Stroiizdat, Moscow (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Ohama, “Development of concrete-polymer materials in Japan,” in: Proceedings of the Second International Congress on Polymers in Concrete, The University of Texas (1978), pp. 121–137.

  6. Y. Kasai, I. Matsui, and Y. Fukushima, “Physical properties of polymer-modified mortars,” in: Proceedings of the Third International Congress on Polymers in Concrete, Koriyama, Japan (1981), pp. 178–192.

  7. R. A. Prusinski, Study of Commercial Development in Precast Polymer Concrete. Polymers in Concrete, American Concrete Institute, SP-58 (1978), pp. 75–101.

  8. J. T. Dekeou and E. K. Schrader, “Polymer-modified glass fiber-reinforced mortar coatings protect navigation lock walls,” in: Proceedings of the Third International Congress on Polymers in Concrete, Koriyama, Japan (1981), pp. 331–346.

  9. L. A. Kuhlmann, “Latex-modified concrete for the repair and rehabilitation of bridges,” The International Journal of Cement Composites and Lightweight Concrete,7, No. 4, 241–247 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Gidrotekhnicheskoe Stroitel'stvo, No. 7, pp. 18–22, July, 1988.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rukin, V.V., Dmitriev, N.V., Kuznetsov, V.E. et al. Polymer-cement shotcrete at the construction of the Dangara hydraulic tunnel. Hydrotechnical Construction 22, 390–394 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01432348

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01432348

Keywords

Navigation