Conclusions
-
1.
It is impossible to consider permissible a reduction in the volume of monitoring observations of the seepage regime of hydraulic structures during the period of their operation.
-
2.
It is necessary to introduce widely automation of seepage monitoring, bearing in mind not only remote transmission of information about the parameters being monitored but also the possibility of a direct assessment of the state of the monitored object by comparing their observed values with preliminarily established limit values (criteria of the permissible state of the monitored object).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
N. Schnitter, “Statistische Sicherheit der Talsperren,” Wasser, Energie Luft,68, No. 5 (1976).,
S. Ya. Éidel'man, On-Site Investigations of the Bratsk Dam [in Russian], Énergiya, Leningrad (1968).
Douziéme Congrés des Grands Barrages, Mexico, Q. 45, R. 45 (1976).
O. N. Nosova and V. P. Terskii, “Nature of anomalous characteristics of the seepage regime of earth structure,” VNIIG,125 (1978).
Additional information
Translated from Gidrotekhnicheskoe Stroitel'stvo, No. 3, pp. 48–51, March, 1981.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nosova, O.N., Egorova, L.G. Monitoring seepage of hydraulic structures. Hydrotechnical Construction 15, 190–194 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01432267
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01432267