Conclusions
-
1.
A weak flow regime is observed in prismatic canals with slopes of the free surface of the flow I≲1·10−5.
-
2.
A change in the kinematic structure of the flow upon a change of the flow regime is accompanied by a change in the law of resistance. The regime of a (weak) flow is characterized by a pronounced increase of the resistance coefficient with decrease of slope and Reynolds number. Calculation of the mean velocity by the Chezy-Manning formula with the usual roughness coefficient for a gradient flow regime is unacceptable.
-
3.
The method of determining the boundary between stream and gradient (or weak) flow regime proposed in [1] is completely reliable and can be recommended for use when designing reclamation canals being constructed under conditions of very small slopes of the terrain.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
V. S. Verbitskii and O. M. Ivanova, “Some predictive estimates of the hydraulic regime of the main diversion canal of Siberian rivers,” Tr. VNIIGiM, 69-76 (1980).
A. N. Ospanov, “Runoff flows and natural stream regime,” Gidrotekh. Melior., No. 1, 26–28, 1984.
D. I. Grinval'd, Turbulence of Channel Flows [in Russian], Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad (1974).
G. V. Zheleznyakov, Capacity of Canal and River Channels [in Russian], Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad (1981).
V. A. Znamenskii, Hydrological Processes and Their Role in the Formation of Water Quality [in Russian], Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad (1981).
Additional information
Translated from Gidrotekhnicheskoe Stroitel'stvo, No. 4, pp. 23–26, April, 1986.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shapiro, K.S., Verbitskii, V.S. & Ospanov, A.N. Investigation of flow in open channels with very small slopes. Hydrotechnical Construction 20, 224–228 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01428953
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01428953