Conclusions
-
1.
Under conditions of designing earth canals for a maximum permissible noneroding velocity a trapezoidal channel shape is potentially unstable.
-
2.
In trapezoidal channels the distribution of the velocity over the width does not correspond to the calculation by the Chezy formula with the use of local (on verticals) hydraulic radii.
-
3.
To provide slope stability of trapezoidal canals it is necessary when estimating the design velocity to take into account the actual distribution of the velocity over the channel width, which practically leads to a decrease of the design velocity.
-
4.
From the viewpoint of cost effectiveness of designing large canals in a deformable earth channel it is necessary to reject trapezoidal shapes. It is necessary to adopt a parabolic configuration corresponding in shape to the diagram of the velocity distribution over the channel width; in this case the design flow velocity can be taken with respect to a depth close to the maximum.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
G. V. Zheleznyakov, Capacity of Canal and River Channels [in Russian], Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad (1981).
E. M. Minskii, Turbulence of a Channel Flow [in Russian], Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad (1952).
D. I. Grinval'd, Turbulence of Channel Flows [in Russian], Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad (1974).
I. A. Sherenkov, Applied Two-Dimensional Problems of Hydraulics of Tranquil Flows [in Russian], Énergiya, Moscow (1978).
N. A. Mikhailova, O. B. Shevchenko, and M. M. Selyametov, “Laboratory investigations of the formation of stable canal channels,” Gidrotekh. Stroit., No. 7 (1980).
V. S. Altunin and M. M. Selyametov, “Increase of the stability of earth canals by means of partial revetment of the slopes,” Gidrotekh. Stroit., No. 3 (1981).
Additional information
Translated from Gidrotekhnicheskoe Stroitel'stvo, No. 3, pp. 24–27, March, 1984.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rabkova, E.K., Elfimov, V.I. & Martines, H.P. Kinematic structure of flow in a trapezoidal channel. Hydrotechnical Construction 18, 124–128 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01428702
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01428702