Advertisement

Rapid increase in the number of androgen receptors following electrical stimulation of the rat muscle

  • Kazuo Inoue
  • Sho Yamasaki
  • Tohru Fushiki
  • Tomomi Kano
  • Toshio Moritani
  • Kazuo Itoh
  • Etsuro Sugimoto
Article

Summary

The changes in the number of androgen receptors in rat gastrocnemius muscle following muscle contraction caused by electrical stimulation were investigated. The gastrocnemius muscle of one leg, which was selected at random for each rat, was stimulated with needle type electrodes, e.g. for 2 s at 10 V and 100 Hz, with 5-s intervals. The contralateral leg was left unstimulated as a control. One set consisted of ten such stimuli, followed by 5-min rest. Three sets every 2 days caused a statistically significant increase in muscle mass, the increase being about 2.5% after the 3rd day of stimulation, 4.4% after the 5th day, 5.9% after the 13th day and 8.3% after the 27th day compared with each control muscle (P< 0.001 in each case). The protein content also increased but the water content did not change. Stimulation over 4 weeks induced an increase in the area of the cross-section of the muscle fibres to about 30076 more than that of the control muscles, though the total muscle fibre numbers were slightly, but significantly, reduced. Electromechanical properties supported the development of the muscle by stimulation, because the maximal isometric tetanic force and peak twitch force markedly increased in the stimulated muscle. The androgen receptors in the muscle cytosol fraction were determined by means of a binding assay involving [3H]methyltrieno-lone, which is an analogue of testosterone, the number having rapidly increased in the stimulated leg, when compared with that in the control leg, by about 25% after the 3rd day. The increase then slowed down, reaching a plateau after the 5th-day of stimulation. The receptor dissociation constants for [3H]methyltrienolone remained unchanged, i.e. approximately 0.3 to 0.4 nmol throughout the experimental period. These findings suggested that a rapid increase in the number of androgen receptors occurred as an early event for a practical increase in muscle mass and thus it may have contributed in part to the triggering of muscle hypertrophy by enhancing the muscle sensitivity to androgen.

Key words

Androgen receptor Skeletal muscle Exercise Muscle hypertrophy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson KM, Liao S (1968) Selective retention of dihydrotestosterone by prostatic nuclei. Nature 219:277–279PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruchovsky N, Wilson JD (1968) The conversion of testosterone to 5u-androgen-l7β-of-3-one by the rat prostate in vivo and in vitro. J Biol Chem 243:2012–2021PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Catelli MG, Binart N, Jung-Testas I, Renoir JM, Baulieu EE, Feramisco JR, Welch WJ (1985) The common 90-kd protein component of non-transformed ‘8S’ steroid receptors is a heatshock protein. EMBO J 4:3131–3135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang C, Kokontis J, Liao S (1988) Structural analysis of complementary DNA and amino acid sequences of human and rat androgen receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:7211–7215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Costill DL, Coyle EF, Fink WF, Lesmes GR, Witzman FA (1979) Adaptations in skeletal muscle following strength training. J Appl Physiol 46:96–99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Danhaive PA, Rousseau GG (1986) Binding of glucocorticoid antagonists to androgen and glucocorticoid hormone receptors in rat skeletal muscle. J Steroid Biochem 24:481–487PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Darr KC, Schultz E (1987) Exercise-induced satellite cell activation in growing and mature skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 63:1816–1821PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Davies AS, Gunn HM (1972) Histochemical fiber types in the mammalian diaphragm. J Anat 112:41–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Green HJ, Thomson JA, Daub WD, Houston ME, Ranney DA (1979) Fiber composition, fiber size and enzyme activities in vastus lateralis of elite athletes involved in high intensity exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 41:109–117Google Scholar
  10. Hickson RC, Galassi TM, Krowski TT, Daniels DG, Chatterton RT Jr (1983) Skeletal muscle cytosol [3H]methyltrienolone receptor binding and serum androgens: effects of hypertrophy and hormonal state. J Steroid Biochem 19:1705–1712PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ho-Kim MA, Tremblay RR, Dube JY (1981) Binding of methyltrienolone to glucocorticoid receptors in rat muscle cytosol. Endocrinol 109:1418–1423Google Scholar
  12. Ikei M, Fukunaga T (1970) A study on training effect on strength per unit of cross-sectional area of muscle by means of ultrasonic measurement. Int Z Angew Physiol Einschl Arbeitsphysiol 28:173–180Google Scholar
  13. Itoh K, Moritani T, Ishida K, Hirofuji C, Taguchi S, Itoh M (1990) Hypoxia-induced fiber type transformation in rat hindlimb muscle: histochemical and electro-mechanical changes. Eur J Appl Physiol 60:331–336Google Scholar
  14. Kahn CR (1980) Role of insulin receptors in insulin-resistant states. Metabolism 29:455–466PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Krieg M, Smith K, Bartsch W (1978) Demonstration of a specific androgen receptor in rat heart muscle: relationship between binding, metabolism, and tissue levels of androgens. Endocrinology 103:1686–1694PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. LeBlanc J, Nadeau A, Boulay M, Rousseau-Migneron S (1979) Effect of physical training and adiposity on glucose metabolism and125I-insulin binding. J Appl Physiol 46:235–239PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lowry OH, Rosenbrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. McDonagh MJ, Davies CTM (1984) Adaptive response of mammalian skeletal muscle to exercise with high loads. Eur J Appl Physiol 52:139–155Google Scholar
  19. Mainwaring WIP, Mangan FR (1973) A study of the androgen receptors in a variety of androgen-sensitive tissues. J Endocrinol 59:121–139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Michel G, Baulieu EE (1980) Androgen receptor in rat skeletal muscle: characterization and physiological variations. Endocrinology 107:2088–2098PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Moritani T, Berry MJ, Bacharach DW, Nakamura E (1987) Gas exchange parameters, muscle blood flow and electromechanical properties of the plantar flexors. Eur J Appl Physiol 56:30–37Google Scholar
  22. Padykula HA, Herman E (1955) The specificity of the histochemical method for adenosine triphosphatase. J Histochem Cytochem 3:170–195PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pratt WB, Sanchez ER, Bresnik EH, Meschinchi S, Scherrer C, Dalmam FC, Welsh MJ (1989) Interaction of the glucocorticoid receptor with 90000 heat shock protein: an evolving model of ligand-mediated receptor transformation and transduction. Cancer Res [Suppl] 49:2222s-2229sPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sale DG, Macdougall JD, Alway SE, Sutton JR (1987) Voluntary strength and muscle characteristics in untrained men and women and male body builders. J Appl Physiol 62:1786–1793PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Schantz P, Randall-Fox E, Hutchison W, Tyden A, Astrand PO (1983) Muscle fiber type distribution, muscle cross-sectional area and maximum voluntary strength in humans. Acta Physiol Scand 117:219–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Schultz E (1989) Satellite cell behavior during skeletal muscle growth and regeneration. Med Sci Sport Exerc 21:S181-S186Google Scholar
  27. Soman VR, Koivisto VA, Deibert D, Felig P, DeFronzo R (1979) Increased insulin sensitivity and insulin binding to monocytes after physical training. N Engl J Med 301:1200–1204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Takeda H, Chadak G, Mutchnik S, Nakamoto T, Chang C (1990) Immunohistochemical localization of androgen receptors with mono- and polyclonal antibodies to androgen receptors. J Endocrinol 126:17–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Tilley WD, Marcelli M, Wilson JD, McOhaul MJ (1989) Characterization and expression of a cDNA encoding the human androgen receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:327–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Tremblay RR, Dube JY, Ho-Kim MA, Lesage R (1977) Determination of rat muscle androgen-receptor complexes with methyltrienolone. Steroids 219:185–195Google Scholar
  31. Wong TS, Booth FW (1988) Skeletal muscle enlargement with weight-lifting exercise by rats. J Appl Physiol 65:950–954PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Yamada S, Buffinger N, Dimario J, Strohman RC (1989) Fibroblast growth factor is stored in fiber extracellular matrix and plays a role in regulating muscle hypertrophy. Med Sci Sports Exerc 21:S173-S180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Yarasheski KE, Lemon PWR, Gilloteaux J (1990) Effect of heavyresistance exercise training on muscle fiber composition in young rats. J Appl Physiol 69:434–437PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kazuo Inoue
    • 1
  • Sho Yamasaki
    • 1
  • Tohru Fushiki
    • 1
  • Tomomi Kano
    • 1
  • Toshio Moritani
    • 2
  • Kazuo Itoh
    • 2
  • Etsuro Sugimoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Health and Physical Education, College of Liberal Arts and ScienceKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations