Skip to main content
Log in

Protection of the concrete of hydraulic structures from the effects of temperature and moisture

  • Published:
Hydrotechnical Construction Aims and scope

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    An analysis of the existing methods of protecting concrete shows that facing the upstream face of a concrete dam is one of the effective measures to eliminate undesirable consequences of cracking and seepage.

  2. 2.

    The use of a facing minimizes the total seepage discharges through the structure and reduces the design requirements imposed on solidity, quality, and grade of concrete.

  3. 3.

    The most promising type of facing is a facing of cast asphaltic concrete with a lightweight aggregate, since in addition to increased waterproofing properties it has good heat insulating properties, which permits its use as a permanent warm formwork during the construction period.

  4. 4.

    A cast asphaltic-concrete facing allows the possibility of self-healing of seeping cracks in the event they occur and, if necessary, repair during operation without drawing down the head on the structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. K. A. Mal'tsov, P. G. Staritskii, A. M. Arkhipov, et al., “Fourth limit state with respect to the life of concrete and reinforced-concrete structures,” in: Transactions of the Joint Conferences on Hydraulic Engineering [in Russian], No. 31, Énergiya, Moscow-Leningrad (1966), p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. I. Sakharov, “Design measures to increase the life of massive hydraulic structures in regions with harsh climates,” Énerg. Stroit. Rubezhom, No. 4, 35–41 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. I. Sakharov, “Design measures to increase the life of thin-walled hydraulic structures in regions with a harsh climate,” Gidrotekh. Stroit., No. 6, 23–28 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. I. Sakharov, Design Measures to Increase the Life of Concrete Structures in Regions with a Harsh Climate [in Russian], Informénergo, Moscow (1978), p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. I. Sakharov and P. A. Pshenitsyn, “Foam epoxy heat insulation and waterproofing of the Kislaya Guba tidal power station,” Énerg. Stroit., No. 4 (1967).

  6. N. A. Smirnov, “Increase of the life of marine hydraulic structures,” in: Transactions of the Joint Conferences on Hydraulic Engineering [in Russian], No. 14, Énergiya, Moscow-Leningrad (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. N. Popchenko and G. A. Nechaev, “Combined waterproofing and heat insulation of hydraulic structures,” Gidrotekh. Stroit., No. 2 (1966).

  8. V. I. Sakharov, “Use of foam epoxy heat insulation and waterproofing at the Gorki hydroelectric station,” Energ. Stroit., No. 9 (1967).

  9. V. M. Davidenko and N. F. Shchavelev, “Heat insulation and waterproofing of concrete of hydraulic structures in regions with a harsh climate,” Izv. VNIIG im. B. E. Vedeneeva,104, 267–279 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. M. Davidenko, E. N. Elizaov, and G. A. Davidenko, “Some problems of increasing the reliability of watertight asphalt facings for concrete dams,” Izv. VNIIG im. B. E. Vedeneeva,128, 23–29 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Gidrotekhnicheskoe Stroitel'stvo, No. 6, pp. 1–5, June, 1986.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davidenko, V.M., Davidenko, G.A. & Kargin, G.M. Protection of the concrete of hydraulic structures from the effects of temperature and moisture. Hydrotechnical Construction 20, 293–299 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01424358

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01424358

Keywords

Navigation