This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Arblaster, Anthony,Democracy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987).
Arnason, Johann P., “The Theory of Modernity and the Problematic of Democracy,”Thesis Eleven, No. 26, 1990, pp. 20–43.
Avineri, Shlomo,Hegel's Theory of the Modern State (Cambridge, GB: Cambridge University Press, 1988).
Beck, Ulrich,Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne (Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1986; English translation forthcoming).
Bell, Daniel,The Coming of Post-Industrial Society, (New York: Basic Books, 1973).
Bernstein, Richard “Rorty's Liberal Utopia,”Social Research, Vol. 57, No. 1 (Spring 1990).
Blumenberg, Hans,The Legitimacy of the Modern Age (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983).-German original.Die Legitimität der Neuzeit (Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp 1966; extended and revised version: 1973–1976).
Bobbio, Norberto,The Future of Democracy (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1987).
Cronin, Thomas E.,Direct Democracy. The Politics of Initiative, Referendum, and Recall (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989).
Crozier, Michel J., Samuel Huntington, Joji Watanuki,The Crisis of Democracy (New York: New York University Press, 1975).
Dahl, Robert A.,A Preface to Economic Democracy (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1985).
Dahl, Robert A.,Democracy and Its Critics (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989).
Dickey, Laurence, “Blumenberg and Secularization: ‘Self-Assertion’ and the Problem of Self-Realizing Teleology in History,”New German Critique, 41 (Spring-Summer 1987): 151–165.
Dubiel, Helmut, “Demokratie,” inWas ist Neokonservatismus? (Frankfurt.M.: Suhrkamp, 1985), pp. 46–67.
Duncan, Graeme (ed.),Democratic theory and practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).
Feyerabend, Paul,Against Method. Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge [1975] (London: Verso, 1978).
Feyerabend, Paul,Science in a Free Society [1978] (London: Verso, 1982).
Frank, Manfred,Die Grenzen der Verständigung. Ein Geistergespräch zwischen Lyotard und Habermas (Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1988).
Gorz, André,Critique of Economic Reason, (New York: Verso, 1989).
Gould, Carol C.,Rethinking Democracy. Freedom and social cooperation in politics, economy, and society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).
Green, Phlip,Retrieving Democracy. InSearch for Civil Equality (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 1985).
Gutmann, Amy (ed.),Democracy and the Welfare State (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988a).
Gutmann, Amy, “Distributing Public Education in a Democracy”, 1988b, in Gutmann, 1988a: 107–130.
Habermas, Jürgen, “Die Dialektik der Rationalisierung. Vom Pauperismus in Produktion und Konsum.”Merkur, 1964, 710–724.
Habermas, Jürgen, “Reflektion über den Begriff der politischen Beteiligung,” in Jürgen Habermas et al.,Student und Politik (Neuwied: Luchterhand, 1961).
Habermas, Jürgen, “On Systematically Distorted Communication,”Inquiry, Vol. 13, 1970, pp. 205–217.
Habermas, Jürgen, and Niklas Luhmann,Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie—Was leistet die Systemforschung? (Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1971).
Habermas, JürgenLegitimation Crisis [1973] (Boston: Beacon Press, 1975).
Habermas, JürgenTheory of Communicative Action, Vol. I: “Reason and the Rationalization of Society” [1981] (Boston: Beacon Press, 1984).
Habermas, Jürgen, “The New Obscurity: The Crisis of the Welfare State and the Exhaustion of Utopian Energies” [1985]Philosophy and Social Criticism, 2, Vol. II (Winter 1986).
Habermas, Jürgen,Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. II: “Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason” [1981] (Boston: Beacon Press, 1987).
Habermas, Jürgen,The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere [1962] (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989a).
Habermas, Jürgen,On the Logic of the Social Sciences [1967] (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989b).
Habermas, Jürgen, “Remarks on the Discussion” (Utrecht Symposium on Habermas), Theory, Culture & Society, 7, November 1990.
Held, David,Models of Democracy (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1987).
Heller, Agnes, “Habermas and Marxism,” in John B. Thompson and David Held (eds.),Habermas—Critical Debates (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982).
Huyssen, Andreas, “Mapping the Postmodern,” in hisAfter the Great Divide. Modernism, Mass Culture, Postmodernism (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1986), pp. 179–221.
Ingram, David, “Legitimacy and the Postmodern Condition: The Political Thought of Jean-François Lyotard,”Praxis International, 7: 3/4 (Winte), 1987/88.
Jacoby, Henry,The Bureaucratization of the World (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973).
Jameson, Frederic, “Foreword”, in Lyotard (1984: vii-xxi).
Keane, John,Democracy and Civil Society (London and New York: Verso, 1988).
Lash, Scott,Sociology of Postmodernism (London and New York: Routledge, 1990).
Lefort, Claude,Democracy and Political Theory (Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press, 1988).
Lipson, Leslie,The Democratic Civilization (New York: Oxford University Press, 1964).
Löwith, Karl,Meaning in History (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949).
Luhmann, Niklas,Zweckbegriff und Systemrationalität (Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1973).
Luhmann, Niklas, “The Future of Democracy,”Thesis Eleven, No. 26, 1990 pp. 46–53.
Lyotard, Jean-François,The Postmodern Condition. A Report on Knowledge [1979] Theory and History of Literature, Vol. 10 (Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, 1984).
Lyotard, Jean-François,The Differend. Phrases in Dispute [1983] Theory and History of Literature, Vol. 46 (Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press, 1988).
Lyotard, Jean-François, and Jean-Loup Thébaud,Just Gaming. Theory and History of Literature, Vol. 20 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985).
Neumann, Franz, “The Concept of Political Freedom,” in hisThe Democratic and the Authoritarian State (Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, 1957).
O'Connor, James,The Fiscal Crisis of the State (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1972).
Offe, Claus, “‘Ungovernability’: the renaissance of conservative theories of crisis” in:Contradictions of the Welfare State (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984), pp. 65–87.
Pateman, Carole,The Disorder of Women. Democracy, Feminism and Political Theory (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1989).
Phillips, Anne,Engendering Democracy (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1991).
Rödel, Ulrich, Günter Frankenberg, Helmut Dubiel.Die demokratische Frage (Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1989).
Rorty, Richard, “Habermas and Lyotard on Post-Modernity,”Praxis International 4: 1 April 1984, pp. 32–44.
Schumpeter, Joseph A.,Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1942).
Spragens, Thomas A.Reason and Democracy (Durham: Duke University Press, 1990).
Thomas, Wendell, ADemocratic Philosophy (New York: Correlated Enterprises, 1938).
van Reijen, Willem, “Philosophical-Political Polytheism: Habermas versus Lyotard,”Theory, Culture and Society 7: 4, Nov. 1990, pp. 95–104.
Veblen, Thorstein,The Vested Interests and the State of the Industrial Arts (New York: Huebsch, 1919.
Vidich, Arthur, J., “American Democracy in the Late Twentieth Century: Political Rhetorics and Mass Media,”International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1990, pp. 5–29.
Vidich, Arthur J., “The End of the Englightenment and Modernity: The Irrational Ironies of Rationalization,”International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, Vol. 4, No. 3 (Spring 1991), pp. 269–284.
Vidich, Arthur J., and Michael W. Hughey, “Fraternization and Rationality in Global Perspective,”International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1988, pp. 242–256.
Wallace, Robert M., “Progress, Secularization and Modernity: The Löwith/Blumenberg Debate,”New German Critique, 22 (Winter 1981): 63–79.
Watson, Stephen, “Jürgen habermas and Jean-François Lyotard: Post-modernism and the Crisis of Rationality,”Philosophy and Social Criticism 1984, 2, pp. 1–24.
Weber, Max,Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 5th ed. (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1972).
Welsch, Wolfgang,Unsere Postmoderne Moderne (Weinheim: VCH Acta humaniora, 1987).
White, Stephen K., “Justice and the Postmodern Problematic,”Praxis International, 7: 3/4 (Winter) 1987/8.
Wiggeshaus Rolf,Die Frankfurter Schule. Geschichte—Theoretische Entwicklung—Politische Bedeutung (München: Carl Hanser, 1986).
Wolin, Sheldon S.,The Presence of the Past. Essays on the State and the Constitution (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1989).
Wolin, Sheldon S., “Democracy in the Discourse of Postmodernism,” inSocial Research, 57, 1 (1990).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dahms, H.F. Democracy and the post-enlightenment: Lyotard and Habermas reappraised. Int J Polit Cult Soc 5, 473–509 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01423903
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01423903