Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the fusion reactions12C+20Ne and16O+16O near the Coulomb barrier

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Physik A Atoms and Nuclei

Abstract

The partial cross sections of heavy residual nuclei produced in the heavy ion fusion of12C+20Ne have been measured atE c.m.=6–15 MeV viaγ-ray spectroscopy with a Ge(Li) detector. Windowless and recirculating gas target systems have been used. The dominant residual nuclei are24Mg,27Al,28Si,30Si,30P and31P, which arise from two- and three-body breakups in the exit channels. The observed excitation functions are smooth in their energy dependence and give no indications for the existence of pronounced resonance structures, in contrast to theoretical predictions. The Coulomb excitation of20Ne served as an intrinsic calibration standard in the determination of absolute partial and total fusion cross sections. The same experimental set-up was also used in the reaction studies of16O+16O atE c.m.=7–14 MeV, going through the same compound nucleus32S at similar excitation energies. The observed energy dependence in the excitation functions is in good agreement with previous work. The total fusion cross section agrees fairly well with two sets of values reported previously, but deviates significantly from other reported absolute cross section values. The relative evaporation distributions of the residual nuclei are similar for both heavy ion reactions. However, the ratio of their total fusion cross sections deviates from model predictions and suggests that compound nucleus formation does depend on the microscopic structure of the colliding nuclei in the entrance channel. From the observed energy dependence of the above ratio, particularly at subcoulomb energies, geometrical effects in the entrance channel (due to deformed and spherical nuclei) appear to be weak. The astrophysical aspects of the data in the context of late stellar nucleosynthesis are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Feshbach, H.: J. Phys. C5, 177 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cindro, N.: Nuclear Molecular Phenomena. Amsterdam, Oxford, New York: North-Holland 1978

    Google Scholar 

  3. Michaud G., Vogt, E.: Phys. Lett. B30, 85 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Michaud G.: Phys. Rev. C8, 525 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Voit H., Dück, P., Galster, W., Haindl, E., Hartmann G., Helb, H.D., Siller, F., Ischenko, G.: Phys. Rev. C10, 1331 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dietzsch, O., Kwiecinska, T., Pilt, A., Proudfoot, G., Hoppe, W., Siegel, D., Marquardt, N.: Annual Report Dynamitron-Tandem-Laboratorium Bochum. p. 52 (1976)

  7. Stokstad, R.G., Switkowski, Z.E., Dayras, R.A., Wieland, R.M.: Phys. Rev. Lett.37, 888 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schiffer. J.P.: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.44, 9 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Conjeaud, M., Gary, S., Harar, S., Wieleczko, J.P.: Nucl. Phys. A309, 515 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kovar, D.G., Geesaman, D.E., Braid, T.H., Eisen, Y., Henning, W., Ophel, T.R., Paul, M., Rehm, K.E., Sanders, S.J., Sperr, P., Schiffer, J.P., Tabor, S.L., Vigdor, S., Zeidman, B., Prosser, F.W.: Phys. Rev. C20, 1305 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krappe, H.J.: Lecture Notes in Physics. Berlin. Heidelberg, New York: Springer

  12. Dayras, R.A., Stokstad, R.G., Switkowski, Z.E., Wieland, R.M.: Nucl. Phys. A265, 153 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Switkowski, Z.E., Stokstad, R.G., Wieland, R.M.: Nucl. Phys. A274, 202 (1976) A279, 502 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  14. High M.D., Cujek B.: Nucl. Phys. A278, 149 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Christensen, P.R., Switkowski Z.E., Dayras, R.A.: Nucl. Phys. A280, 189 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Switkowski, Z.E., Wu. S.-C., Overlay, J.C., Barnes C.A.: Nucl. Phys. A289, 236 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wu, S.-C., Overlay, J.C., Barnes, C.A., Switkowski, Z.E.: Nucl. Phys. A312, 177 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gomez del Campo, J., Dayras, R.A., Biggerstaff, J.A., Shapira D., Snell, A.H., Stelson, P.H., Stokstad, R.G.: Phys. Rev. Lett.43, 26 (1979) and Phys. Rev. C19. 2170 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wong, C.Y.: Phys. Rev. Lett.31 766 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mosel, U.: Proceedings of the Symposium on macroscopic features of heavy-ion collisions. Argonne Natl. Lab. News Bull.1, 341 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Charzewski, C. von. Hnizdo, V., Toepffer, C.: preprint (University of Witwatersrand. Johannesburg/South Africa)

  22. Stokstad, R.G., Eisen, Y., Kaplanis, S., Pelte, D., Smilansky, U., Tserruya, L.: Phys. Rev. Lett.41, 465 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Saint-Laurent, F., Conjeaud, M., Harar, S., Loiseaux, J.M., Menet, J., Viano, J.B.: Nucl. Phys. A327, 517 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Burbidge, E.M., Burbidge, G.R., Fowler, W.A., Hoyle, F.: Rev. Mod. Phys.29, 547 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fowler, W.A., Caughlan, G.R., Zimmerman, B.A.: Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.13, 69 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rolfs, C., Trautvetter, H.P.: Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.28, 115 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Spinka, H., Winkler, H.: Nucl. Phys. A233, 456 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kolata J.J., Freemann R.M., Haas, F., Heusch, B., Gallmann, A.: Phys. Rev. C19, 2237 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cheng, V.K.C., Little, A., Yuen, H.C., Lazarus, S.M., Hanna, S.S.: Nucl. Phys. A322, 168 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wu. S.-C.: Thesis. California Institute of Technology (1978); Wu. S.-C., Barnes, C.A.: (to be published)

  31. Endt, P.M., Leun, C. van der: Nucl. Phys. A310, 1 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kettner, K.U., Lorenz-Wirzba, H., Rolfs, C., Winkler, H.: Phys. Rev. Lett.38, 337 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Becker, H.W.: Diplomarbeit. Universität Münster (1978)

  34. Blanke, E., Brand, K., Genz, H., Richter, A., Schrieder, G.: Nucl. Instrum. Methods122, 295 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Brand, K.: Nucl. Instrum. Methods141, 519 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Trautvetter, H.P., Elix, K., Rolfs, C., Brand, K.: Nucl. Instrum. Methods161, 173 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rolfs, C., Görres, J., Kettner, K.U., Lorenz-Wirzba, H., Schmalbrock, P., Trautvetter, H.P., Verhoeven, W.: Nucl. Instrum. Methods157, 19 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Görres, J., Kettner, K.U., Kräwinkel, H., Rolfs, C.: Nucl. Instrum. Methods (submitted)

  39. Hulke, G.: Thesis. Universität Münster (1980)

  40. Kieser, W.E., Schulze, D.: Nucl. Instrum. Methods167, 349 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schmalbrock, P.: Staatsexamensarbeit. Universität Münster (1976)

  42. Rolfs, C., Baumeister, H., Becker, H.W., Bachmann, L., Görres, J., Kettner, K.U., Kieser, W.E., Kràwinkel, H., Schmalbrock, P., Trautvetter, H.P., Verhòven, N.: Annual Report Institut für Kernphysik Münster (1979) and Nucl. Instrum. Methods (to be published)

  43. Northeliffe, L.C., Schilling, R.F.: Nucl. Data Tables7, 233 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Maher, J.V., Sachs, M.W., Siemssen, R.H., Weidinger, A., Bromley, D.A.: Phys. Rev.188, 1665 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Eickhoff, H.: Thesis. Universität Münster (1978)

  46. Ajzenberg-Selove, F.: Nucl. Phys. A300, 1 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Alder, K., Winther, A.: Coulomb excitation. New York: Academic Press 1966

    Google Scholar 

  48. McGowan, F.K., Stelson, P.H.: Nuclear Spectroscopy and Reactions. Part C, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press 1974

    Google Scholar 

  49. Riess, F.: (private communication)

  50. Switkowski, Z.E., Wieland, R.M., Winther, A.: Phys. Rev. Lett.33, 840 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Tserruya, I., Eisen, Y., Pelte, D., Gavron, A., Oeschler, H., Berndt, D., Harncy, H.L.: Phys. Rev. C18, 1688 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Christensen, P.R., Switkowski, Z.F.: Nucl. Phys. A280, 205 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hulke, G., Rolfs, C., Trautvetter, H.P.: Nucl. Instrum. Methods (to be submitted)

  54. Chasman, C., Jones, K.W., Ristinen, R.A.: Nucl. Instrum. Methods37, 1 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Beringer, R.: Phys. Rev. Lett.18, 1006 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Hohm, H., Scheid, W., Greiner, W.: Phys. Lett. B29, 473 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Riesenfeldt, P.W., Thomas, T.D.: Phys. Rev. C2, 711 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Rasmussen, J.O., Tanabe, K.S.: Nucl. Phys. A171, 497 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Alexander, J.M., Vaz, L.C., Lin, S.Y.: Phys. Rev. Lett.33, 1487 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Freiesleben, H., Huizenga, J.R.: Nucl. Phys. A224, 503 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Ro 429/7–12]

The authors greatly appreciate the help of H.W. Becker, L. Buchmann, J. Görres, K.U. Kettner, W.E. Kieser. P. Schmalbrock and M. Wiescher during the course of the experiments. We would like to thank W. Verhoeven and the mechanical workshop for their work on the apparatus as well as J.W. Hammer (Stuttgart) for the loan of the jet target chamber. The travel support to the laboratory at Bochum was provided by the Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität and is highly acknowledged. One of the authors (C.R.) thanks Prof. C.A. Barnes for many fruitful discussions as well as the provision of the16O+16O data prior to publication. C.R. also wishes to thank the California Institute of Technology and Prof. T.A. Tombrello for an appointment as Visiting Associate, during which time the present manuscript was prepared. Finally, Prof. F. Riess is thanked for calculations of the12C+20Ne Coulomb excitation and Prof. H.J. Krappe for helpful comments on the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hulke, G., Rolfs, C. & Trautvetter, H.P. Comparison of the fusion reactions12C+20Ne and16O+16O near the Coulomb barrier. Z Physik A 297, 161–183 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01421473

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01421473

Keywords

Navigation