Skip to main content
Log in

A study of affine matching with bounded sensor error

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Affine transformations of the plane have been used in a number of model-based recognition systems. Because the underlying mathematics are based on exact data, in practice various heuristics are used to adapt the methods to real data where there is positional uncertainty. This paper provides a precise analysis of affine point matching under uncertainty. We obtain an expression for the range of affine-invariant values that are consistent with a given set of four points, where each image point lies in an ∈-disc of uncertainty. This range is shown to depend on the actualx-y-positions of the data points. In other words, given uncertainty in the data there are no representations that are invariant with respect to the Cartesian coordinate system of the data. This is problematic for methods, such as geometric hashing, that are based on affine-invariant representations. We also analyze the effect that uncertainty has on the probability that recognition methods using affine transformations will find false positive matches. We find that there is a significant probability of false positives with even moderate levels of sensor error, suggesting the importance of good verification techniques and good grouping techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ballard, D.H., 1981, “Generalizing the Hough Transform to Detect Arbitrary Patterns,”Pattern Recognition 13(2):111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basri, R. & S. Ullman, 1988, “The Alignment of Objects with Smooth Surfaces,”Second Int. Conf. Comp. Vision, 482–488.

  • Besl, P.J. & R.C. Jain, 1985, “Three-dimensional Object Recognition,”ACM Computing Surveys, 17(1):75–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, M., R.M. Haralick & L.G. Shapiro, 1990, “Optimal Affine-Invariant Point Matching,”Proc. 6th Israel Conf. on AI, pp. 35–61.

  • Cyganski, D. & J.A. Orr, 1985, “Applications of Tensor Theory to Object Recognition and Orientation Determination”,IEEE Trans. PAMI, 7(6):662–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMenthon, D.F. & L.S. Davis, 1992, “Model-Based Object Pose in 25 Lines of Code,”Second Europ. Conf. Comp. Vision, pp. 335–343.

  • Efimov, N.V., 1980,Higher Geometry, translated by P.C. Sinha. Mir Publishers, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R.E., 1989, “Uncertainty Estimates for Polyhedral Object Recognition, ”IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. Aut., pp. 348–353.

  • Forsyth, D., J.L. Mundy, A. Zisserman, C. Coelho, A. Heller, C. Rothwell, 1991, “Invariant Descriptors for 3-D Object Recognition and Pose”,IEEE Trans. PAMI, 13(10):971–991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavrila, D.M. & F.C.A. Groen, 1992, “3D Object Recognition from 2D Images Using Geometric Hashing,” 13(4):263–278.

  • Grimson, W.E.L., 1990,Object Recognition by Computer: The role of geometric constraints, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimson, W.E.L., 1990, “The Combinatorics of Heuristic Search Termination for Object Recognition in Cluttered Environments,”First Europ. Conf. on Comp. Vis., pp. 552–556.

  • Grimson, W.E.L. & D.P. Huttenlocher, 1990, “On the Sensitivity of the Hough Transform for Object Recognition,”IEEE Trans. PAMI 12(3):255–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • tGrimson, W.E.L. & D.P. Huttenlocher, 1990, “On the Sensitivity of Geometric Hashing”,Proc. Third Int. Conf. Comp. Vision, pp. 334–338.

  • Grimson, W.E.L. & D.P. Huttenlocher, 1991, “On the Verification of Hypothesized Matches in Model-Based Recognition”,IEEE Trans. PAMI 13(12):1201–1213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimson, W.E.L., D.P. Huttenlocher, & T.D. Alter, 1992, “Recognizing 3D Objects from 2D Images: An Error Analysis,”Proc. CVPR.

  • Grimson, W.E.L., D.P. Huttenlocher, & D.W. Jacobs, 1991, “Affine Matching With Bounded Sensor Error: A Study of Geometric Hashing & Alignment,” MIT AI Lab Memo 1250.

  • Guéziec, A. & N. Ayache, 1992, “Smoothing and Matching of 3D Space Curves, ”Proc. Second Europ. Conf. Comp. Vision, pp. 620–629.

  • Horaud, R., B. Conio, & O. Leboulleux, 1989, “An Analytic Solution for the Perspective-4-Point Problem”Comp. Vis. Graph. Im. Proc, 47:33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher, D.P. and S. Ullman, 1987, “Object Recognition Using Alignment”,Proc. First Int. Conf. Comp. Vision, pp. 102–111.

  • Huttenlocher, D.P. & S. Ullman, 1990, “Recognizing Solid Objects by Alignment with an Image,”Inter. Journ. Comp. Vision 5 (2):195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D., 1991, “Optimal Matching of Planar Models in 3D Scenes,”IEEE Conf. Comp. Vis. and Patt. Recog. pp. 269–274.

  • Klein, F., 1939,Elementary Mathematics from an Advanced Standpoint: Geometry, MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korn, G.A. & T.M. Korn, 1968,Mathematical Handbook for Scientists and Engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamdan, Y., J.T. Schwartz & H.J. Wolfson, 1988a, “On Recognition of 3-D Objects from 2-D Images,”IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. Aut. pp. 1407–1413.

  • Lamdan, Y., J.T. Schwartz & H.J. Wolfson, 1988, “Object Recognition by Affine Invariant Matching,”IEEE Conf. Comp. Vis. and Patt. Recog. pp. 335–344.

  • Lamdan, Y., J.T. Schwartz & H.J. Wolfson, 1990, “Affine Invariant Model-Based Object Recognition,”IEEE Trans. Rob. Aut., vol. 6, pp. 578–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamdan, Y. & H.J. Wolfson, 1988, “Geometric Hashing: A General and Efficient Model-Based Recognition Scheme,”Second Int. Conf. Comp. Vis. pp. 238–249.

  • Lamdan, Y. & H.J. Wolfson, 1991, “On the Error Analysis of ‘Geometric Hashing’,”IEEE Conf. Comp. Vis. and Patt. Recog. pp. 22–27.

  • Rigoutsos, I. & Hummel, R., 1991, “Robust Similarity Invariant Matching in the Presence of Noise,”Eighth Israeli Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision, Tel Aviv.

  • Rigoutsos, I. & Hummel, R., 1991, “Several Results on Affine Invariant Geometric Hashing,”Eighth Israeli Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision, Tel Aviv.

  • Rigoutsos, I. & Hummel, R., 1993, “Distributed Bayesian Object Recognition,”IEEE Conf. Comp. Vis. and Patt. Recog. pp. 180–186.

  • Sarachik, K.B. & W.E.L. Grimson, 1992, “Gaussian Error Models for Recognition”MIT AI Lab Memo.

  • Thompson, D. & J.L. Mundy, 1987, “Three-Dimensional Model Matching From an Unconstrained Viewpoint”,Proc. IEEE Conf. Rob. Aut. pp. 280.

  • Van Gool, L., P. Kempenaers & A. Oosterlinck, 1991, “Recognition and Semi-Differential Invariants,”EEE Conf. Comp. Vis. and Patt. Recog. pp. 454–460.

  • Wayner, P.C, 1991, “Efficiently Using Invariant Theory for Model-based Matching,”IEEE Conf. Comp. Vis. and Patt. Recog. pp. 473–478.

  • Weiss, I., 1988, “Projective Invariants of Shape,”DARPA IU Workshop pp. 1125–1134.

  • Wells, W, 1991, “MAP Model Matching,”IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 486–492.

  • Wolfson, H.J., 1990, “Model Based Object Recognition by Geometric Hashing,”First Europ. Conf. Comp. Vis. pp. 526–536.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This report describes research done in part at the Artificial Intelligence Laboratory of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Support for the laboratory's research is provided in part by an ONR URI grant under contract N00014-86-K-0685, and in part by DARPA under Army contract number DACA76-85-C-0010 and under ONR contracts N00014-85-K-0124 and N00014-91-J-4038. WELG is supported in part by NSF contract number IRI-8900267. DPH is supported at Cornell University in part by NSF grant IRI-9057928 and matching funds from General Electric and Xerox, and in part by AFOSR under contract AFOSR-91-0328.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grimson, W.E.L., Huttenlocher, D.P. & Jacobs, D.W. A study of affine matching with bounded sensor error. Int J Comput Vision 13, 7–32 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01420793

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01420793

Keywords

Navigation