Skip to main content
Log in

Recording of single unit potentials in human spinal nerve roots: A new diagnostic tool

  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Single unit potentials can be recorded directly with wire electrodes during an operation in man. Since averaging is not necessary this recording method is a fast neuromonitoring tool. Using 2 pairs of platinum electrodes it was possible to record extracellular single unit potentials at 2 sites in nerve root filaments in the spinal canal and to determine conduction velocities. Afferent and efferent single unit potentials could be distinguished from each other by a reversed conduction time and a reversed potential change making a differentiation between dorsal and ventral root parts possible. An activity increase due to touching the skin could be recorded. Therefore dermatomes of nerve root filaments and root filaments of dermatomes can be identified during the operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carlsson CA, Sundin T (1967) Reconstruction of efferent pathways to the urinary bladder in a paraplegic child. Rev Surg 24: 73–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carlsson CA, Sundin T (1980) Reconstruction of afferent and efferent nervous pathways to the urinary bladder in two paraplegic patients. Spine 5: 37–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coggeshall RE, Applebaum ML, Frasen M, Stubbs TB, Sykes MT (1975) Unmyelinated axons in human ventral roots, a possible explanation for the failure of dorsal rhizotomy to relieve pain. Brain 98: 157–166

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coggeshall RE, Haruhide I (1977) Sensory fibres in ventral roots L7 and S1 in the cat. J Physiol 267: 215–235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coggeshall RE (1980) Law of separation of function of the spinal roots. Physiological Reviews 60: 716–755

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Frazier CH, Mills CK (1912) Intradural root anastomosis for the relief of paralysis of the bladder. Jama 59: 2202–2206

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldstein SS, Rall W (1974) Changes of the action potential shape and velocity for changing core conductor geometry. Biophys J 14: 731–757

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Howe JF, Loeser JD, Calven WH (1977) Mechanosensitivity of dorsal root ganglia and chronically injured axons: A physiological basis for the radicular pain of nerve root compression. Pain 3: 25–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Light AR, Perl ER (1984) Peripheral sensory systems. In: Dyck PI, Thomas PK, Lambert EH, Bunge RP (eds) Peripheral neuopathy, volume 1. Saunders Company, pp 210–239

  10. Loeb GE (1976) Decreased conduction velocity in the proximal projections of myelinated dorsal root ganglion cells in the cat. Brain Res 103: 381–385

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Paintal AS (1953) The conduction velocities of respiratory and cardiovascular afferent fibres in the vagus nerve. J Physiol 121: 341–359

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Paintal AS (1965) Effect of temperature on conduction in single vagal and saphenous myelinated nerve fibres of the cat. J Physiol 180: 20–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Patil A (1981) Intercostal nerves to spinal nerve roots anastomosis (spinal cord bypass) and Harrington rod fusion in traumatic paraplegia—Technical note. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 57: 299–303

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ploncard Ph (1982) A new approach to the intercosto-brachial anastomosis in the treatment of brachial plexus paralysis due to root avulsions. Late results. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 61: 281–290

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rasminsky M (1978) Ectopic generation of impulses and crosstalk in spinal nerve roots of “dystrophic” mice. Ann Neurol 3: 351–357

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schalow G (1985) The problem of cauda equina nerve root identification. Zbl Neurochirurgie 46: 322–330

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sperry RW (1945) The problem of central nervous reorganisation after nerve regeneration and muscle transposition. Quart Rev Biol 20: 311–369

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sperry RW (1947) Effect of crossing nerves to antagonistic limb muscles in the monkey. Arch Neurol Psychiat (Chicago) 58:452–473

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vallbo ÅB (1976) Prediction of propagation block on the basis of impulse shape in single unit recordings from human nerves. Acta Physiol Scand 97: 66–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vallbo ÅB, Hagbarth KE, Torebjörk HE, Wallin BG (1979) Somatosensory, propioceptiv and sympathetic activity in human peripheral nerves. Physiol Rev 59: 919–957

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Voorhoeve PE, Zwaagstra B (1984) Central effects by ventral root nociceptive afferents. In: Creutzfeldt O, Schmidt RF, Willis WD (eds) Sensory-motor integration in the nervus system. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 116–125

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zottermann Y (1939) Touch, pain and tickling: An electrophysiological investigation on cutaneous sensory nerves. J Physiol 95: 1–28

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schalow, G., Lang, G. Recording of single unit potentials in human spinal nerve roots: A new diagnostic tool. Acta neurochir 86, 25–29 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01419500

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01419500

Keywords

Navigation