Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 209–225 | Cite as

Treating employees fairly and organizational citizenship behavior: Sorting the effects of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and procedural justice

  • Robert H. Moorman
  • Brian P. Niehoff
  • Dennis W. Organ


A study was conducted to measure the relative contribution of perceptions of procedural justice toward predicting organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) controlling for the effects of job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Employees in a national cable television company completed a survey containing measures of work satisfaction, affective and continuance commitment, and perceptions of fairness, while their managers completed an OCB survey. Results using LISREL 7 indicated support fpr relationships between procedural justice and commitment, satisfaction, and OCB. However, no individual relationships between commitment and OCB nor between satisfaction and OCB were found once the relationships between justice and citizenship were controlled. These findings are discussed using the group value model of procedural justice.

Key Words

organizational citizenship behavior procedural justice job satisfaction organizational commitment 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior.Social Justice Research, 1, 177–198.Google Scholar
  2. Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983), Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship.”Academy of Management Journal, 26, 587–595.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, T. E. (1992). Foci and bases of commitment: Are they distinctions worth making?Academy of Management Journal, 35, 232–244.Google Scholar
  4. Blau, P. (1964).Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Brayfield, A. H., & Crockett, W. H. (1955). Employee attitudes and employee performance.Psychological Bulletin, 52, 396–424.Google Scholar
  6. Dansereau, F., Graen, G. B., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46–78.Google Scholar
  7. Farh, J. L., Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1990). Accounting for organizational citizenship behavior: Leader fairness and task scope versus satisfaction.Journal of Management, 16, 705–721.Google Scholar
  8. Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions.Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115–130.Google Scholar
  9. Graen, G., & Cashman, J. F. (1975). A role making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. In Hunt, J. G., & Larson, L. L. (Eds.)Leadership Frontiers, 143–165, Kent, OH: Kent State Press.Google Scholar
  10. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow.Journal of Management, 16, 399–432.Google Scholar
  11. Iaffaldano, M. T., & Muchinsky, P. M. (1985). Job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 97, 251–273.Google Scholar
  12. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1986).LISREL VII: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood. Instrumental Variables and Least Squares Methods (4th Ed.). Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
  13. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978).The Social Psychology of Organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Konovsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1991). Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 698–707.Google Scholar
  15. Konovsky, M. A., & Folger, R. (1991).The effects of procedural and distributive justice on organizational citizenship behavior. Unpublished manuscript, A. B. Freeman School of Business, Tulane University.Google Scholar
  16. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988).The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  17. Lind, E. A., Kanfer, & Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952–959.Google Scholar
  18. Lind, E. A., & Earley, P. C. (1991, August).Some thoughts on self and group interests: A parallel-processor model. Paper presented at the National Academy of Management Meetings, Miami, FL.Google Scholar
  19. Martin, C. L., & Bies, R. J. (1991, August). Just laid off, but still a good citizen? In Eskew, D. E. (Chair),The Role of Organizational Justice in Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Symposium conducted at the National Academy of Management Meetings, Miami, FL.Google Scholar
  20. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1984). Testing a “side bet theory” of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 372–378.Google Scholar
  21. Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845–855.Google Scholar
  22. Motowidlo, S. J., Packard, J. S., & Manning, M. R. (1986). Occupational stress: Its causes and consequences for performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 618–629.Google Scholar
  23. Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982).Employee Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Netemeyer, R., Johnston, M., & Burton, S. (1990). Analysis of role conflict and role ambiguity in a structural equations framework.Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 148–157.Google Scholar
  25. Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Fairness in performance monitoring: The role of justice in mediating the relationship between monitoring and organizational citizenship behaviors.Academy of Management Journal, 36, 527–556.Google Scholar
  26. Nunnally, J. C. (1978).Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  27. O'Reilly, C., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 492–499.Google Scholar
  28. Organ, D. W. (1977). A reappraisal and reinterpretation of the satisfaction causes performance hypothesis.Academy of Management Review, 2, 46–53.Google Scholar
  29. Organ, D. W. (1988a),Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  30. Organ, D. W. (1988b). A restatement of the satisfaction-performance hypothesis.Journal of Management, 14, 547–557.Google Scholar
  31. Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. In Staw, B. M., & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 12), 43–72. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  32. Organ, D. W., & Konoysky, M. A. (1989). Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 157–164.Google Scholar
  33. Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1989).A second generation measure of organizational citizenship behavior. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  34. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors.Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107–142.Google Scholar
  35. Puffer, S. M. (1987). Prosocial behavior, noncompliant behavior, and work performance among commission sales people.Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 615–621.Google Scholar
  36. Scholl, R. W. (1981). Differentiating organizational commitment from expectancy as a motivating force.Academy of Management Review, 6, 589–599.Google Scholar
  37. Schwab, D. P., & Cummings, L. L. (1970). Theories of performance and satisfaction: A review.Industrial Relations, 9, 408–430.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents.Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653–663.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. L. (1969).The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  40. Vroom, V. H. (1964).Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  41. Weiner, Y. (1982). Commitment in organizations: A normative view.Academy of Management Review, 7, 418–428.Google Scholar
  42. Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors.Journal of Management, 17, 601–617.Google Scholar
  43. Williams, L. J., & Hazer, J. T. (1986). Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A reanalysis using latent variables structure equation methods.Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 219–231.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert H. Moorman
    • 1
  • Brian P. Niehoff
    • 2
  • Dennis W. Organ
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Management, College of Business and EconomicsWest Virginia UniversityMorgantown
  2. 2.Department of Management, College of Business AdministrationKansas State UniversityManhatten
  3. 3.Department of Management, School of BusinessIndiana UniversityBloomington

Personalised recommendations