Advertisement

Research in Higher Education

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 431–449 | Cite as

Market conditions, productivity, and promotion among university faculty

  • Robert Perrucci
  • Kathleen O'Flaherty
  • Harvey Marshall
Article

Abstract

This paper contrasts the performance levels and promotion experiences of 371 faculty members under three different market conditions reflecting the supply and demand for university faculty (buyer's market, seller's market, and stable market). The central questions examined are, What is the effect of market conditions upon (1) the length of time it takes for promotion; (2) the promotion rate; (3) the productivity of assistant and associate professors before each promotion; and (4) the productivity of full professors after attaining that rank? Findings are most consistent with a market model indicating that faculty promoted during a buyer's market remain in rank longer before being promoted and exhibit a greater rate of productivity than faculty promoted during other market conditions. There is also support for the elite model in that the impact of “tight” market conditions on productivity is greatest for faculty below the rank of full professor.

Keywords

Faculty Member Associate Professor Performance Level Education Research Market Condition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bibb, R. and Form, W. H. The effects of industrial, occupational, and sex stratification on wages in blue-collar markets.Social Forces 1977,55 974–996.Google Scholar
  2. Blau, P. and Duncan, O. D.The American Occupational Structure. New York: Wiley, 1967.Google Scholar
  3. Boneau, A. On growing wiser: learning from the employment problems of other disciplines.American Psychologist, May 1972, 367–370.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, D. G.The Mobile Professors. Washington, D.C.: The American Council on Education, 1967.Google Scholar
  5. Cartter, A. M. The supply and demand of college teachers.American Statistical Association Social Statistics Proceedings. American Statistical Association, Washington, D.C., 1965.Google Scholar
  6. Cartter, A. M. Scientific manpower for 1970–1985.Science April 1971,172 132–140.Google Scholar
  7. Chase, J. L. The numbers game in graduate education, quantitative and qualitative trends.The Journal of Higher Education 1964,35 138–143.Google Scholar
  8. Demerath, J. Notes on a nervous job market.The American Sociologist, May 1971, 187–188.Google Scholar
  9. Ferris, A. L. Forecasting supply and demand of sociologists.The American Sociologist, August 1968, 225–234.Google Scholar
  10. Hauser, R. and Featherman, D. Socioeconomic achievement of U.S. men, 1962 to 1972.Science 1974,185 325–331.Google Scholar
  11. Koch, H. W. On physics and the employment of physicists in 1970.Physics Today 1971,24 23–27.Google Scholar
  12. Marshall, H. and Perrucci, R. The structure of academic fields and rewards in academia.Sociology and Social Research 1982,66 127–146.Google Scholar
  13. McGinnis, R. and Solomon, L. Employment prospects for Ph.D. sociologists during the seventies.The American Sociologist 1973,8 57–63.Google Scholar
  14. O'Toole, J. The reserve army of the underemployed.Change, Part I (May 1975), pp. 26–63; Part II (June 1975), pp. 26–63.Google Scholar
  15. Perloff, R. Enhancing psychology by assessing its manpower.American Psychologist, May 1972, 355–361.Google Scholar
  16. Radner, R. and Miller, L. S.Demand and Supply in U.S. Higher Education. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.Google Scholar
  17. Spilerman, S. Careers, labor market structure, and socioeconomic achievement.American Journal of Sociology 1977,83 551–593.Google Scholar
  18. Stolzenberg, R. M. Occupations, labor markets and the process of wage attainment.American Sociological Review 1975,40 645–665.Google Scholar
  19. Talbert, J. and Bose, C. E. Wage-attainment processes: the retail clerk case.American Journal of Sociology 1977,83 403–424.Google Scholar
  20. Tanur, J. M., and Coser, R. L. Pockets of ‘poverty’ in the salaries of academic women.AAUP Bulletin 1978,64 26–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Agathon Press, Inc 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Perrucci
    • 1
  • Kathleen O'Flaherty
    • 2
  • Harvey Marshall
    • 1
  1. 1.Purdue UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Wichita State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations