Skip to main content
Log in

Fair allocation on a network

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The adjusted marginal allocation method which was proposed by Claus and Kleitman to allocate costs in a network is modified. Using the modified method, we obtain that if the final allocation is in the imputation set, it must be in the core. All three and four users cases are studied.

Zusammenfassung

Die marginale Zuordnungsmethode von Claus und Kleitman zum Festlegen von Kosten in einem Netzwerk wird modifiziert. Mit dieser modifizierten Methode ergibt sich folgender Sachverhalt: Ist die endgültige Kostenzuteilung eine Imputation, so ist sie auch im Kern. Es werden alle Fälle mit 3 und 4 Benutzern analysiert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bird CB (1976) On cost allocation for a spanning tree: a game theoretic approach. Networks 6:335–350

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bondy JA, Murty USR (1976) Graph theory with applications. Macmillian Press

  3. Claus A, Kleitman DJ (1973) Cost allocation for a spanning tree. Networks 3:289–304

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lucas WF (1981) Application of cooperative games to equitable allocation. Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, vol 24, pp 19–36

    Google Scholar 

  5. Owen G (1982) Game theory. Academic Press

  6. Syslo MM, Deo N, Kowalik JS (1983) Discrete optimization algorithms with Pascal programs. Prentice-Hall Inc

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors are grateful to two anonymous referees for many helpful suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, C., Liao, W.P. & Tsay, G.R. Fair allocation on a network. ZOR - Methods and Models of Operations Research 34, 29–41 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01415948

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01415948

Key words

Navigation