Skip to main content
Log in

Pulsatile flow measurement in hydraulic systems using a laser velocimeter

  • Papers
  • Published:
Opto-electronics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Servo valves find their major application in high performance hydraulic control systems where the accurate control of position, velocity and load is essential. Because of this, it is important to determine the dynamic characteristics of the servo valve (i.e. flow rate as a function of input command signal) more precisely.

Previous techniques for this evaluation depended on monitoring spool position using linear transducers, since flow measurement techniques capable of following fast transients and oscillating (or pulsating) flows were not easily applied. The introduction of the laser Doppler anemometer changes this. Steady state flow measurement, using the dual beam scatter system, is now common but since it needs a spectrum analyser to measure the Doppler frequency it is not suitable for unsteady flow. Since hydraulic systems are relatively particle free, the Doppler signals are dreceived intermittently. Because of this, a signal processing system has been developed which measures the period of one or more oscillations in the frequency burst caused by a scattering particle passing through the control volume.

Using this technique steady and unsteady laminar flow profiles have been measured in order to assess its effectiveness in the performance testing of hydraulic servo systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Butler,Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 173, 16 (1959) 429–458.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. M. Davies,Quart. Journ. Mech. and Appl. Maths. 17, 4 (1964) 484–498.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. E. Cook andH. S. Heaps,Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 179, 1 (1964) 847–854.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. N. Nikiforuk, P. R. Ukrainez, andS. C. Tsai,J. Mech. Eng. Sc. 11, 2 (1969) 168–174.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. F. Martin,ibid. 12,5 (1970) 331–338.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. A. Blake andK. I. Jespersen,N.E.L. Report 510 (May 1972).

  7. Y. Yeh andH. Z. Cummins,Appl. Phys. Lett. 4 (1964) 176–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. J. Goldstein andD. K. Kreid,J. Applied Mech. 34 (1967) 813–818.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. J. Rudd,J. Phys. E. 2 (1969) 55–58.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. C. Angus et al, Ind. Eng. Chem. 61, 2 (1969) 8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Greated,J. Phys. E. (Sci. Inst.) 3 (1970) 753–756.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. K. Mazunder,Appl. Phys. Lett. 16 (1970) 462.

    Google Scholar 

  13. O. Lanz, C. C. Johnson, andS. Norikana,ibid. 17,12 (1970) 523–525.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Daneshyar,J. Mech. Sc. 12 (1970) 435–445.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Uchida,Z.A.M.P. 7 (1956) 403.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Schlichting, “Boundary Layer Theory”, McGraw-Hill (1968), 10th Ed., 419–421.

  17. E. B. Denison, W. H. Stevenson, andR. W. Fox,A.I.Ch.E. Journ. 17,4 (1971) 781–787.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weston, W., Lalor, M.J. & Cleaver, J.W. Pulsatile flow measurement in hydraulic systems using a laser velocimeter. Opto-electronics 4, 417–427 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01414145

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01414145

Keywords

Navigation