Abstract
Like other services of the mental health center, the intake service should be an agent of constructive community change and development. The potential for community influence is manifest in the sheer numbers of people who pass through intake in a year. For this potential to be realized, the average worker must undergo a sizeable reorientation in treatment philosophy, professional knowledge, and style of work. The principles that emerged from an examination and critique of Maimonides Central Reception Service are presented, with illustrative cases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barker, G. & Eisdorfer, C. Closed ranks in microcosm. Pitfalls of a training experience in community consultation.Community Menial Health Journal, 1970,6, 101–109.
Calhoun, D., Naftalin, A., Nelson, N. B., Pajeou, A. G., & Sibley, M. Q. Book three, community.An Introduction to Social Science (3rd. ed.). New York: Lippincott, 1961.
Klein, D.Community dynamics and mental health. New York: Wiley, 1968.
Leighton, A.My name is Legion. New York: Basic Books, 1959.
Schein, E. H., & Bennis, W.Personal and organizational change through group methods. New York: Wiley, 1965.
Schneider, E., & Jackson, B. E. Two-month study of individuals receiving central reception service referral services. Unpublished manuscript. 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
An abbreviated version of this paper was read at the annual meeting of the American Orthopsychiatric Association, Washington, D.C., March, 1971.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nadler, E.B. Social approaches to community mental health via intake or central reception services. Community Ment Health J 9, 361–367 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01410873
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01410873