Abstract
No-fault absenteeism control programs represent an emerging counterpoint to traditional misconduct-based approaches. By altering the policies governing absence in the work place, the rights and responsibilities of both the employee and employer may be modified. This article examines the arbitral standards applied in the disposition of grievances arising under no-fault absenteeism plans. Arbitration cases from 1980 to 1989 are analyzed; a taxonomic structure for reviewing arbitrator rulings on the unilateral imposition of no-fault programs, as well as discipline and discharge arising under no-fault policies, is developed. While advocates of no-fault plans have asserted that arbitrators will embrace these plans, the results of this analysis indicate that arbitrators will infuse standard elements of reasonableness and just cause into no-fault policy. Trends in arbitral standards in absence cases, policy-making strategies for managements and unions, as well as implications for the rights and responsibilities of employees and employers are outlined.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amoco Chemicals Corp., 79 LA 89 (Byars, 1982).
Associated Wholesale Grocers, 89 LA 1144 (Berger, 1985).
Atlantic Richfield Co., 84 LA 257 (Gibson, 1985).
B. F. Goodrich Co., 90 LA 1297 (McIntosh, 1988).
Block, H., & Mittenthal, R. (1985). Arbitration and the absent employee.Arbitration 1984: Absenteeism, Recent Law, Panels, and Published Decisions. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual Meeting National Academy of Arbitrators, Walter J. Gershenfeld, (ed.), Washington, DC: The Bureau of National Affairs, pp. 77–105.
Carnation Co., 79 LA 679 (de Grasse, 1982).
Celenese Corp., 62 LA 1175 (Altrock, 1973).
Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 81 LA 56 (Berger, 1983).
Commercial Filters Division, 91 LA 25 (Bethel, 1988).
Cosmair, Incorporated, 80 LA 22 (Kerrison, 1982).
Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J. (1987). The Collective Governance of Industrial Relations. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
Dap, Inc., 84 LA 459 (Shieber, 1984).
Dimco-Gray Company, 85 LA 650 (Seinsheimer, 1985).
Duff, J. C. (1985). The quantitative monitoring of absenteeism: Do ‘no-fault’ and just cause standards conflict?The Arbitration Journal, 40(1), 61–62.
Elkouri, F., & Elkouri, E. A. (1985).How Arbitration Works, Fourth Edition. Washington, DC: The Bureau of National Affairs.
Folger, R., & Bies, R. J. (1989). Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice.Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 79–90.
General Foods Corp., 91 LA 1251 (Goldstein, 1988).
General Metal and Heat Treating, Inc., 80 LA 7 (Wolk, 1982).
Giant Foods, Inc., 79 LA 916 (Seibel, 1982).
Hawaii Transfer Company, Ltd., 74 LA 531 (Tsukiyama, 1980).
Howard Paper Mills, Inc., 87 LA 863 (Dworkin, 1986).
Jacobs Mfg. Co., 28 LRRM 1162 (1951).
Jenn-Air Corp., 80 LA 882 (Edes, 1982).
Kansas Power and Light Co., 87 LA 867 (Belcher, 1986).
Keebler Co., 75 LA 975 (Morris, 1980).
Kennecott Cooper Corp., 77 1A 505 (Richardson, 1981).
Kuzmits, F. E. (1984). Is your organization ready for no-fault absenteeism?Personal Administrator, 29(12), 119–127.
Kuzmits, F. E. (1981). No-fault: A new strategy for absenteeism control.Personnel Journal, 60(5), 387–390.
L. Gordon and Son, Inc., 80 LA 560 (Barnhardt, 1983).
Lear Siegler, Inc., 85 LA 411 (Rothschild, 1985).
Le Blond Machine Tool, Inc., 76 LA 827 (Keenan, 1981).
Mesker Industries, Inc., 85 LA 921 (Mikrut, 1985).
Moore, M. L. (1987). Components of absenteeism control programs. In R. Schuler and S. Youngblood,Readings in Personnel and Human Resource Management, Third Edition, St. Paul: West Publishing, 367–376.
Mor-Flg, 77 LA 889 (Nigro, 1981).
Mueller Co., 78 La 673 (Richardson, 1982).
Multiplex Company, Inc., 81 LA 625 (Smith, 1983).
Nuodex, Inc., 87 LA 257 (Millious, 1986).
Olson, D., & Bangs, R. (1984). No-Fault Attendance Control: A real world application.Personnel Administrator, 29(6), 53–56.
Osigweh, C. A. B. (1990). Toward an employee responsibilities and rights paradigm.Human Relations, 43(12), 1277–1309.
Osigweh, C. A. B., & Hutchinson, W. R. (1989). Positive discipline.Human Resource Management, 28(3), 367–383.
Packaging Corp. of America, 86 LA 753 (Smith, 1986).
Pantasote, Inc., 82 LA 665 (Seinsheimer, 1984).
Primeline Industries, Inc., 88 LA 700 (Morgan, 1986).
Regal Plastic Co., 86 LA 788 (Woolf, 1985).
Rosenthal, R. (1979). Arbitral standards for absentee discharges.Labor Law Journal, December, 732–740.
Sanyo Manufacturing Corp., 84 LA 169 (Nicholas, 1984).
Scott, D. K., Markham, S. E., & Robers, R. W. (1985). Rewarding good attendance: A comparative study of positive ways to reduce absenteeism.Personnel Administrator, 30(8), 72–83.
Scott, D. K., & Taylor, S. G. (1983). An analysis of absenteeism cases taken to arbitration: 1975–1981.The Arbitration Journal, 38(3), 61–70.
Scott, D. K., & Taylor, S. G. (1982). Absenteeism control methods: A survey of practices and results.Personnel Administrator, 27(6), 73–84.
Simmons, U.S.A., 85 LA 809 (Sidman, 1985).
Simpson Paper Co., 86 LA 503 (Leach, 1985).
Southwest Forest Industries, Inc., 81 LA 1234 (Cromwell, 1983).
T. Marzetti Co., 91 LA 154 (Sharpe, 1988).
Union Tank Car Co., 77 LA 249 (Taylor, 1981).
Webster Electric Company, Inc., 83 LA 141 (Kindig, 1984).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moore, M.L., Nichol, V.W. & McHugh, P.P. Review of no-fault absenteeism cases taken to arbitration, 1980–1989: A rights and responsibilities analysis. Employ Respons Rights J 5, 29–48 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01407806
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01407806