Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Neurophysiologic monitoring in posterior fossa surgery

II. BAEP-waves I and V and preservation of hearing

  • Clinical Articles
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Of 135 cases operated upon for posterior fossa lesions 103 showed preoperative hearing. In 34 acoustic neurinomas 14 had postoperative initially preserved hearing, in 20 microvascular decompressions 19 had preserved postoperative hearing and in 49 other lesions 5 lost hearing. The relationship between preservation of hearing and the preservation or loss of brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) waves I and V in the three groups of namely: acoustic neurinomas, microvascular decompressions and other lesions are presented. It is noteworthy that only patients with preserved waves I or V are suitable candidates for intraoperative monitoring. The loss of wave V is usally associated with hearing loss (10 out of 13 cases). But hearing loss is also possible despite preservation of wave I (3 out of 60) or despite preservation of wave V (2 out of 68). The predictive value of the preservation of waves I and V is not an absolute one, but it strongly suggests preserved hearing postoperatively. The dilemma remains that once waves I or V are lost during surgery there is no certainty as to postoperative hearing. If wave V recovers after an initial loss, hearing is usually preserved but not in all cases. In wave I amplitude changes alone were more frequent than in wave V, where latency changes alone were more frequently observed. Particular surgical manoeuvres could be found to be often associated with a wave deterioration. Hearing preservation could never be achieved in patients who already preoperatively had no BAEP. It is concluded that BAEP monitoring is of great value in surgery for microvascular decompression and cerebello-pontine-angle (CPA) tumours with preserved hearing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abramson M, Stein BM, Pedley TA, Emerson RG, Wazen JJ (1985) Intraoperative BAER monitoring and hearing preservation in the treatment of acoustic neurinomas. Laryngoscope 95: 1318–1322

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen A, Starr A, Nudlemann K (1981) Assessment of sensory function in the operating room utilizing cerebral evoked potentials: a study of fifty-six surgically anesthetized patients. Clin Neurosurg 28: 457–481

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bentivoglio P, Cheesman AA, Symon L (1988) Surgical management of acoustic neuromas during the last five years. Part II. Results for facial and cochlear nerve function Surg Neurol 29: 205–209

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchheit WA, Gastaldo JA (1977) The posterior approach to acoustic tumours. Preservation of hearing. In: Silverstein H, Norrell H (eds) Neurological surgery of the ear, Vol 1. Birmingham, Ala Aesculapius, pp 263–266

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bursick DM, Vries JK, Sclabassi RJ, Guthkelch AN (1984) Intraoperative brainstem evoked potentials as an adjunct to posterior fossa surgery in children. In: Barber C, Nodar RH (eds) Evoked potentials II. Butterworth, Boston London, pp 565–571

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen NL, Ransohoff J (1981) Preservation of hearing in acoustic neuroma surgery. In: Samii M, Jannetta PJ (eds) The cranial nerves. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 561–568

    Google Scholar 

  7. Daspit CP, Raudzens PA, Shetter AG (1982) Monitoring of intraoperative auditory brainstem responses. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 90: 108–116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eckermeier L, Pirsig W, Mueller D (1979) Histopathology of 30 non-operated acoustic schwannomas. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 222: 1–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fischer G, Morgon A, Fischer C, Bret PH, Massini B, Kzaiz M, Chariot M (1987) Total removal of acoustic neuromas. Facial nerve and hearing preservation Neurochirurgie 33: 169–183

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Frerebeau P, Benezech J, Uziel A, Coubes P, Segnarbieux F, Malonga M (1987) Hearing preservation after acoustic neurinoma operation. Neurosurgery 21: 197–200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedman WA, Kaplan BJ, Gravenstein D, Rhoton AL (1985) Intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potentials during posterior fossa microvascular decompression. J Neurosurg 62: 552–557

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Glasscock ME, Hayes JW, Miller GW, Drake FD, Kanok MM (1978) Preservation of hearing in tumours of the internal auditory canal and cerebellopontine angle. Laryngoscope 88: 43–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grundy BL, Lina A, Procopio PT, Jannetta PJ (1981) Reversible evoked potential changes with retraction of the eighth cranial nerve. Anesth Analgesia 60: 835–838

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hardy RW, Kinney SE, Lueders H, Lesser RP (1982) Preservation of cochlear nerve function with the aid of brain stem auditory evoked potentials. Neurosurgery 11: 16–19

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harner SG, Laws ER, Onofrio BM (1984) Hearing preservation after removal of acoustic neurinomas. Laryngoscope 94: 1431–1434

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Harner SG, Ebersold MJ (1985) Management of acoustic neuromas, 1978–1983. J Neurosurg 63: 175–179

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hochstetter A, Schramm J, Fahlbusch R (1987) Variability and typical changes of brainstem acoustic evoked potentials monitored in cerebellopontine angle surgery and non-cranial surgery. In: Barber C, Blum T (eds) Evoked potentials III. Butterworth, Boston London, pp 171–175

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kunze ST, Steiner HH (1987) Trigeminusneuralgie: Ergebnisse der mikrochirurgischen parapontinen Dekompression. Nervenarzt 58: 33–39

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Levine RA, Ojemann RG, Montgomery WW, McGaffigan PM (1984) Monitoring auditory evoked potentials during acoustic neuroma surgery. Insights into the mechanism of the hearing loss Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 93: 116–123

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Møller AR, Jannetta PJ (1983) Monitoring auditory nerve function during cranial nerve microvascular decompression operations by direct recordings from the eighth nerve. J Neurosurg 59: 493–499

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nadol Jr JB, Levine R, Martuza RL, Ojemann RG, Montgomery WW, Klevens de Sandoval P (1987) Preservation of hearing in surgical removal of acoustic neuromas of the internal auditory canal and cerebellar pontine angle. Laryngoscope 11: 1287–1294

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ojemann RG, Levine RA, Montgomery WW, Me Gaffigan PM (1984) Use of intraoperative auditory evoked potentials to preserve hearing in unilateral acoustic neuroma removal. J Neurosurg 61: 938–948

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Piatt JH, Radtke RA, Erwin CW (1985) Limitations of brainstem auditory evoked potentials for intraoperative monitoring during a posterior fossa operation: Case report and technical note. Neurosurgery 16: 818–821

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Raudzens PA, Shetter AG (1982) Intraoperative monitoring of brainstem auditory evoked potentials. J Neurosurg 57: 341–348

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rowed DW, Nedzelski JM, Cashman MZ, Stanton S, Harrison RV (1988) Cochlear nerve monitoring during cerebellopontine angle operations. Can J Neurol Sci 15: 68–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sabin HI, Bentivoglio P, Symon L, Cheesman AD, Prasher D, Momma F (1987) Intra-operative electrocochleography to monitor cochlear potentials during acoustic neuroma excision. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 85: 110–116

    Google Scholar 

  27. Samii M, Turel KE, Penkert G (1984) Mangement of seventh and eighth nerve involvement by cerebellopontine angle tumors. Clin Neurosurg 32: 242–272

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schramm J, Mokrusch T, Fahlbusch R, Hochstetter A (1988) Detailed analysis of intraoperative changes monitoring brain stem acoustic evoked potentials. Neurosurgery 22: 694–702

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schramm J, Watanabe E, Strauss C, Fahlbusch R (1989) Neurophysiologic monitoring in posterior fossa surgery. I. Technical principles, Applicability and Limitations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 98: 9–18

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sekiya T, Iwabuchi T, Kamata S, Ishida T (1985) Deterioration of auditory evoked potentials during cerebellopontine angle manipulations. An interpretation based on experimental model in dogs. J Neurosurg 63: 598–607

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sekiya T, Møller AR, Jannetta PJ (1986) Pathophysiological mechanisms of intraoperative and postoperative hearing deficits in cerebellopontine angle surgery: An experimental study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 81: 142–151

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sekiya T, Møller AR (1987) Avulsion rupture of the internal auditory artery during operations in the cerebellopontine angle: A study in monkeys. Neurosurgery 21: 631–637

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sekiya T, Møller AR (1988) Effects of cerebellar retraction on the cochlear nerve: an experimental study on Rhesus monkeys. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 90: 45–52

    Google Scholar 

  34. Silverstein H, McDaniel A, Wazen J, Norrell H (1985) Retrolabyrinthine vestibular neurectomy with simultaneous monitoring of eighth nerve and brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 93: 736–742

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sugita K, Kobayashi S (1982) Technical and instrumental improvements in the surgical treatment of acoustic neurinomas. J Neurosurg 57: 747–752

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Strauss C, Fahlbusch R, Schramm J, Hochstetter A (1988) Brainstem auditory evoked potentials after removal of large acoustic neurinomas with preserved hearing and hearing loss. In: Barber C, Blum T (eds) Evoked potentials III. Butterworth, New York London, pp 176–180

    Google Scholar 

  37. Symon L, Sabin HJ, Bentivoglio P, Cheesman AD, Prasher D, Barrat H (1988) Intraoperative monitoring of the electrocochleogram and the preservation of hearing during acoustic neuroma excision. In: Proceedings of the 8th European Congress of Neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir [Suppl] 42, Springer, Wien New York, pp 27–30

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tator ChH, Nedzelski JM (1985) Preservation of hearing in patients undergoing excision of acoustic neuromas and other cerebellopontine angle tumors. J Neurosurg 63: 168–174

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yasargil MG, Smith RD, Gasser JC (1977) Microsurgical approach to acoustic neurinomas. In: Krayenbühl Het al (eds) Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, Vol 4. Springer, Wien New York, pp 93–129

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yokoh A, Sugita K, Kobayashi S (1987) Clinical study of brain retraction in different approaches of diseases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 87: 134–139

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zapulla RA, Malis LI, Karmel BZ (1984) Utility of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in diagnosis and surgical treatment of tumors of the cerebellopontine angle. In: Barber C, Nodar RH (eds) Evoked potentials II. Butterworth, Boston London, pp 194–215

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zapulla RA, Greenblatt E, Kaye S, Malis L (1984) A quantitive assessment of the brainstem auditory evoked response during intraoperative monitoring. Neurosurgery 15: 186–191

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. E. Watanabe M.D.

    Present address: Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo University, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

  2. J. Schramm

    Present address: Neurochirurgische Klinik, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Federal Republic of Germany

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Neurochirurgische Klinik, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Federal Republic of Germany

    E. Watanabe M.D., C. Strauss & R. Fahlbusch

Authors
  1. E. Watanabe M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Schramm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Strauss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Fahlbusch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This work was supported by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Schr 285/1–2), presented in part at the European Congress of Neurosurgery, Barcelona, September 1987.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watanabe, E., Schramm, J., Strauss, C. et al. Neurophysiologic monitoring in posterior fossa surgery. Acta neurochir 98, 118–128 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01407337

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01407337

Keywords

Search

Navigation