Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

“Z” flow hydrocephalus shunt, a new approach to the problem of hydrocephalus, the rationale behind its design and the initial results of pressure monitoring after “Z” flow shunt implantation

  • Clinical Articles
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The over-drainage of CSF after shunt implantation, particularly when the patient is in the vertical posture, is well documented. Problems associated with it are negative pressure syndrome (postural headache and postural irritability), abnormal skull size, craniosynostosis and subdural haematoma. The pressure gradient in the vertical position between the cranial cavity and the right atrium is 15 to 20 cm of water and between the cranial and peritoneal cavity it is 25 to 32cm of water and both these are much higher than those needed for the optimum functioning of a conventional shunt. The need, therefore, has been for a self-regulating device that can adjust itself to any change of posture from horizontal to vertical and vice versa and regulate the flow of CSF from the cranial cavity.

“Z” Flow hydrocephalus shunt system has this in-built selfregulating mechanism to prevent over drainage of CSF and the resultant abnormal low pressure in the cranial cavity.

The rationale behind the functioning of “Z” Flow hydrocephalus shunt system has been discussed, its design has been described and illustrated and the results of pressure monitoring after Z Flow shunt implantation in five adult patients have been detailed. As the opening pressures of the “Z” Flow shunt system are 15–29 cm of water, it has been found to prevent over-drainage of CSF and maintain intraventricular pressure within normal limits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson FM (1952) Subdural haematoma, a complication of operation for hydrocephalus. Paediatrics 10: 11–18

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson H (1966) Craniosynostosis as a complication after operation for hydrocephalus. Acta Paediat Scand 55: 192–196

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ayer JB (1925) CSF pressure from the clinical point of view. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 14: 440–448

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baldini M, Princi L, Vivenza C (1980) Subdural haematoma secondary to CSF ventricular shunt. Schweiz Arch Neurol Neurochir Psychiatry 127 (1): 5–14

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bradley KC (1970) Cerebrospinal fluid pressure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 33: 387–397

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cutler RWP, Page L, Galicich Jet al (1934) Formation and absorption of cerebrospinal fluid in man. Brain 91: 523

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davidoff LM, Feiring EH (1953) Subdural haematoma occurring in surgically treated hydrocephalic children with a note on a method of handling persistent accumulations. J Neurosurg 10: 557–563

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Di Rocco C, Maire G, Rossi GFet al (1976) Cerebrospinal fluid pressure studies in normal pressure hydrocephalus and cerebral atrophy. Eur Neurol 14 (2): 119–128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Emery JL (1965) Intracranial effects of long standing decompression of the brain in children with hydrocephalus and meningomyelocele. Develop Med Child Neurol 7: 302–309

    Google Scholar 

  10. El Shafei IL (1975) Ventriculo-venous shunt to the proximal segment of an occluded neck vein. A new method for shunting the cerebrospinal fluid to the venous circulation. Surg Neurol 3 (5): 237–244

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Faulhauer K, Schmitz P (1978) Over-drainage phenomena in shunt treated hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 45 (1): 89–101

    Google Scholar 

  12. Faulhauer K (1982) The overdrained hydrocephalus. Clinical manifestations and management. In: Krayenbühl Het al (eds) Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, Vol 9. Springer, Wien New York, pp 3–24

    Google Scholar 

  13. Flexner LB, Weed LH (1933) Factors concerned in positional alterations of intracranial pressure. Am J Physiol 104: 681–692

    Google Scholar 

  14. Foltz EL, Shurtleff DB (1966) Conversion of communicating hydrocephalus to stenosis, occlusion of aqueduct during ventricular shunting. J Neurosurg 24: 520–529

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Foltz EL, Shurtleff DB (1963) Five year comparative study of hydrocephalus in children with and without operation. J Neurosurg 20: 1064–1078

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fox JL, McCullough DC, Green RC (1973) Effects of cerebrospinal fluid shunt on intracranial pressure and on cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. 2. A new technique of pressure measurements: results and concepts. 3. A concept of hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 36 (2): 302–312

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fox JL, Portnoy HD, Schulte RR (1973) Cerebrospinal fluid shunts: an experimental evaluation of flow rates and pressure values in the anti-siphon valve. Surg Neurol 1 (15): 299–302

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fox JL, McCullough DC, Green RC (1972) Cerebrospinal fluid shunts: an experimental comparison of flow rates and pressure values in various commercial systems. J Neurosurg 37 (6): 700–705

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gruber R, Jenny P, Herzog B (1984) Experience with the anti siphon device in shunt therapy of paediatric hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 61 (1): 156–162

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Illingworth RD (1970) Subdural haematoma after the treatment of chronic hydrocephalus by ventriculocaval shunts. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 33 (1): 95–99

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kiekens R, Mortier W, Pothmann Ret al (1982) The slit ventricle syndrome after shunting in hydrocephalic children. Neuropediatrics 13 (4): 190–194

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kloss JL (1968) Craniosynostosis secondary to ventricular shunt. Am J Dis Child 116: 315–317

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lange SA de (1974) The effect of prolonged cerebrospinal fluid shunting on developing skull and brain. Dev Med Child Neurol 16 (2): 219–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Loman J (1934) Components of cerebrospinal fluid pressure as affected by changes in posture. Arch Neurol Psychiat 31: 679–681

    Google Scholar 

  25. Magnaes B (1976) Body positions and cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Part 2: clinical studies on orthostatic pressure and the hydrostatic pressure in diffferent point. Br J Neurosurg 44 (6): 698–705

    Google Scholar 

  26. Magnaes B (1976) Testing cerebrospinal fluid shunt capacity and adequacy by lumbar route in adults. Surg Neurol 6 (6): 327–333

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Masserman JH (1934) Cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics IV. Clinical experimental studies. Arch Neurol Psychiatr 32: 523–553

    Google Scholar 

  28. McCullough DC, Fox JL (1974) Negative intracranial pressure hydrocephalus in adults with shunts and its relationship to the production of subdural haematoma. J Neurosurg 40 (3): 372–375

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Portnoy HD, Schulte RR, Fox JLet al (1973) Anti siphon and reversible occlusion valves for shunting in hydrocephalus and preventing post shunt subdural haematomas. J Neurosurg 38: 729–738

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Samuelson S, Long DM, Chou SN (1972) Subdural haematoma as a complication of shunting procedures for normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 37: 548–551

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shucart WA, Connolly R (1975) Experimental negative intraventricular pressures. J Surg Res 19 (1): 43–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Watters GV, Page L, Lorenzo AVet al (1969) Relationship between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) formation, absorption and pressure in human hydrocephalus. Trans Am Neurol Assoc 94: 153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandhai Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow and Surgiwear Products, Biryaganj, Shahjahanpur, India

    D. K. Chhabra, G. D. Agrawal & P. Mittal

Authors
  1. D. K. Chhabra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. D. Agrawal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Mittal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chhabra, D.K., Agrawal, G.D. & Mittal, P. “Z” flow hydrocephalus shunt, a new approach to the problem of hydrocephalus, the rationale behind its design and the initial results of pressure monitoring after “Z” flow shunt implantation. Acta neurochir 121, 43–47 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405181

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405181

Keywords

Search

Navigation