Skip to main content
Log in

The value of autopsies in neurosurgery

  • Clinical Articles
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 26 August 2011

Summary

Many previous studies have reported the value of autopsy in assessing clinical diagnostic accuracy. None of them however, assessed the value of autopsies in a specific clinical speciality. The authors reviewed the findings of 123 consecutive neurosurgical autopsies with reference to the premortem clinical diagnoses. The study showed that 7% of cases had a wrong clinical diagnosis and in 9% of cases the clinical diagnosis was incomplete. Only in 5% of all cases knowledge of the autopsy findings would have led to a change in management and outcome. The autopsies also confirmed that 11% of cases died following a surgical complication and in 3% of cases the primary cause of death was non-neurosurgical. The latter was a previously unrecognised finding in 8% of autopsies. The autopsy will remain a valuable means of clinical audit and the increasing financial pressures to reduce the number of autopsies should be resisted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asnaes S, Frederiksen V, Fenger (1983) The value of hospital autopsy. A study of causes and modes of death estimated before and after autopsy. Forensic Sci Int 21: 23–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cameron HM, McGoogan E, Watson H (1980) Necropsy: a yardstick for clinical diagnosis. Br Med J 281: 985–988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cummins BH: Frenchay neurosurgical unit operations profile 1988. (A personal communication)

  4. Goldman L, Sayson R, Robbins S,et al (1983) The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. N Eng J Med 308(17): 1000–1005.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harrison M, Hourihane DO'B (1989) Quality assurance programme for necropsies. J Clin Pathol 42: 1190–1193.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hill RB, Anderson RE (1988) Is a valid quality assurance program possible without the autopsy ? Hum Pathol 19(10): 1125–1126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kircher T, Nelson J, Burdo H (1985) Autopsy as a measure of accuracy of the death certificate. N Eng J Med 313(20): 1263–1269.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Landefeld CS, Chren MM, Myers A,et al (1988) Diagnostic yield of the autopsy in a university hospital and a community hospital. N Eng J Med 318(19): 1249–1254.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schned RA, Mogielnicki RP, Stauffer ME (1986) A comprehensive quality assessment program on the autopsy service: Am J Clin Pathol 86(2): 133–138.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stevanovic G, Tucakovic G, Doltic R,et al (1986) Correlation of clinical diagnosis with autopsy findings: A retrospective study of 2145 consecutive autopsies. Hum Pathol 17: 1225–1230.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-1118-y.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jamjoom, A., Moss, T., Jamjoom, Z.A. et al. The value of autopsies in neurosurgery. Acta neurochir 112, 126–131 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405140

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405140

Keywords

Navigation