Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

T-laminoplasty — a surgical approach for cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Technical note

  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The T-laminoplasty allows for a generous decompression of the cervical canal. At the same time, it avoids the risk of late instability. The T-laminoplasty is an improvement over various other methods of laminoplasty for several reasons:

  1. 1.

    A bone graft from donor site is not needed.

  2. 2.

    The implanted bone graft is firmly secured, avoiding dislocation and compression of the spinal cord.

  3. 3.

    A fusion of two segments becomes unnecessary.

  4. 4.

    Implants (met al or bone) are not needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arima T (1969) Postlaminectomy malignments of the cervical spine. J Brain Nerve Trauma (Jpn) 1: 71–78

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fager CA (1973) Results of adequate posterior decompression in relief of spondylotic cervical myelopathy. J Neurosurg 38: 684–692

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fager CA (1977) Management of cervical disc lesion and spondylosis by posterior approaches. Clin Neurosurg 24: 488–507

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gorter K (1976) Influence of laminectomy on the course of cervical myelopathy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 33: 265–281

    Google Scholar 

  5. Herkowitz HN (1988) A comparison of anterior cervical fusion, cervical laminectomy and cervical laminoplasty for the surgical management of multiple level spondylotic radiculopathy. Spine 13 (7): 774–780

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirabayashi K (1978) Expansive open door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Operation (Jpn) 32: 1159–1163

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano Ket al (1983) Expansive open door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine 8: 693–699

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hukuda S, Ogata M, Mochizuki T, Shichikawa K (1988) Laminectomy versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: brief report. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 70 (2): 325–325

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ishida Y, Suzuki K, Ohmori K, Kikata Y, Hattori Y (1989) Critical analysis of extensive cervical laminectomy. Neurosurgery 24: 215–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Itoh T, Tsuji H (1982) En block cervical spinal canal laminoplaty. Bessatsu Seikei Geka (Jpn) 2: 241–248 (see Kimura, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kahn EA (1947) The role of the dentate ligaments in spinal cord compression and the syndrome of lateral sclerosis. J Neurosurg 4: 191–199

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kimura I, Mitsuru OH, Shingu H (1984) Cervical myelopathy treated by canal expansive laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 66: 914–920

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Koyama T, Hana J (1985) Cervical laminoplasty using apatite beads as implants. Experiences in 31 patients with compressive myelopathy due to developmental canal stenosis. Surg Neurol 24: 663–667

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurokawa T, Tsuyama N, Tanaka H (1982) Enlargement of spinal canal by sagittal splitting of spinosous process. Bessatsu Seikeigea (Jpn) 2: 234–240 (see Nakano, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Matsutsakiet al (1982) Cervical canal expansive laminoplasty with unilateral fusion. Bessatsu Seikei Geka (Jpn) 2: 249–252 (see Kimura, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nakano N, Nakano T, Nakano K (1988) Comparison of the results of laminectomy and open door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myeloradiculopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 13: 792–794

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ohmori K, Ishida Y, Suzuku K (1987) Suspension laminectomy: a new technique for compression myelopathy. Neurosurgery 21: 950–957

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oyama M, Hattori S, Morikawa N (1973) A new method of cervical laminectomy. Central Jpn J Orthop Traumat Surg 16: 792–794

    Google Scholar 

  19. Piepgras DG (1977) Posterior decompression for myelopathy due to cervical spondylosis: laminectomy alone versus laminectomy with dentate ligament resection. Clin Neurosurg 24: 508–515

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rogers L (1961) The treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy by mobilisation of the cervical cord into an enlarged spinal canal. J Neurosurg 18: 490–492

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sim FH, Svien HJ, Bickel NHet al (1974) Swan neck deformaty following extensive cervical laminectomy. A review of 21 cases. J Bone Joint Surg 56 A: 564–580

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tsuji H (1982) Laminoplasty for patients with compressive myelopathy due to so-called spinal canal stenosis in cervical and thoracic regions. Spine 7: 28–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Watanabe K, Hirabayashi K (1981) Expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Orthopaedics (Jpn) 32: 357–362 (see Hirabayashi, 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  24. White AA, Panjabi MM (1988) Biomechanical considerations in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 13 (7): 856–860

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zanasi R, Fioretta G, Rotolo F, Zanasi L (1984) “Open door” operation to raise the vertebral arch in myelopathy due to cervical spondylosis. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 10: 21–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamburger, C. T-laminoplasty — a surgical approach for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Acta neurochir 132, 131–133 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01404860

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01404860

Keywords

Navigation