Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A prospective study of the importance of psychological and social factors for the outcome after surgery in patients with slipped lumbar disk operated upon for the first time

  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

57 patients who underwent surgery for slipped lumbar disc for the first time were examined prospectively 6 months after surgery for the purpose of deciding the correlation between the outcome of surgery and social and psychological factors. The following factors were found to be of importance: Female sex, action for damages, prolonged disease of the back; prolonged, current attack, report of long-term illness, pathological pain producing, anxiety, depression and multiple somatic complaints revealed by Minnesota Multiple Personality Inventory (MMPI)6, severe pain reported immediately post-operatively, employment and the presence of complete herniation at surgery.

A closer study revealed 3 factors which were important independently and which explained the other factors: Admission of symptom scale (Ad) in the MMPI, the duration of the current attack and whether the patient was employed. On this basis we define a group with severe psychological and social strain (PASS), 57% of which had a poor outcome. 5% of the rest of the patients had a poor outcome.

With the pre-operative assessment of whether or not the patients are under severe psychological and social strain, the outcome of surgery could be predicted correctly in 86% of the patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carlsson AM (1983) Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain 16: 87–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dirks JF, Kinsman RA, Nelson JJ, Fross KH (1978) New developments in panic-fear research in astma: Validity and stability of the MMPI panic-fear scale. Br J med Psychol 51:119–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Documenta Geigy (1970). Mathematics and statistics. Basle

  4. Espersen JO, Kosteljanetz M, Halaburt H, Miletic T (1984) Predictive value of radiculography in patients with lumbagosciatica. A prospective study (Part II). Acta Neurochir (Wien) 73: 213–221

    Google Scholar 

  5. Foldspang A, Juul S, Olsen J, Sabroe S (1981) Epidemiologi. Sygdom og befolkning. Munksgaard, København, pp 1–218

    Google Scholar 

  6. Greene RL (1980) The MMPI. An interpretive manual. Grune & Stratton Inc, New York, pp 1–306

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gross AR (1986) The effect of coping strategies on the relief of pain following surgical intervention for lower back pain. Psychosom Medicine 48: 229–241

    Google Scholar 

  8. Herron LD, Pheasant HC (1982) Changes in MMPI profiles after low-back surgery. Spine 7: 591–597

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Holmes TH, Rahe RH (1967) The social readjustment rating scale. J Psychosom Res 11: 213–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kleiger JH, Kinsman RA (1980) The development of an MMPI alexithymia scale. Psychother Psychosom 34: 17–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kosteljanetz M, Espersen JO, Halaburt H, Miletic T (1984) Predictive value of clinical and surgical findings in patients with lumbago-sciatica. A prospective study (Part I). Acta Neurochir (Wien) 73: 67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Little KB, Fisher J (1958) Two new experimental scales of the MMPI. J Cons Psychol 22: 305–306

    Google Scholar 

  13. Long CJ, Brown DA, Engelberg J (1980) Intervertebral disc surgery. Strategies for patient selection to improve surgical outcome. J Neurosurg 52: 818–824

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dostdam EMM, Duivenvoorden HJ (1983) Predictability of the result of surgical intervention in patients with low back pain. J Psychosom Res 27: 273–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ransford AO, Cairns D, Mooney V (1976) The pain drawing as an aid to the psychological evaluation of patients with low-back pain. Spine 1: 127–134

    Google Scholar 

  16. Berkeley LR (1984) A critique of the surgical management of lumbar disc disease in a private neurosurgical practise. Spine 9: 500–504

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roslund J (1974) Indications for lumbar disc surgery. Doctorial dissertation, Stockholm

  18. Taylor WP, Stern WR, Kubiszyn TW (1984) Predicting patients perception of response to treatment for low-back pain. Spine 9: 313–316

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Weber H (1983) Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 8: 131–140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Århus, Denmark

    L. V. Sørensen, O. Mors & O. Skovlund

Authors
  1. L. V. Sørensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. O. Mors
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. O. Skovlund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sørensen, L.V., Mors, O. & Skovlund, O. A prospective study of the importance of psychological and social factors for the outcome after surgery in patients with slipped lumbar disk operated upon for the first time. Acta neurochir 88, 119–125 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01404148

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01404148

Keywords

Search

Navigation