Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The state of the frontal sinus after craniotomy

  • Clinical Articles
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In 39 patients, 24 male, 15 female, the frontal sinus was opened during a frontal, a bifrontal or a pterional trephination for neurosurgical treatment of trauma, tumours or aneurysms. In 25 out of 39 patients the frontal sinus subsequently was obliterated, in 11 out of 39 patients the apical half or 2/3 of the sinus were ablated and the remaining caudal part covered with a galea periosteal flap leaving the fronto-nasal duct intact. In 3 out of 39 patients, the periphery of the sinus was ablated and the remaining part covered. All patients were followed over a mean period of 2 years and had a final evaluation using CTs, X-rays, ultrasonography and a complete ENT examination. In 4 out of 25 obliteration was successful and complete, in 16 out of 25 there was a partial or complete re-aeration of the residual sinus and in 5 out of 25 the sinus was infected. In one out of eleven patients where the frontal sinus was bisected with preservation of the lower half, the basal part of the sinus was infected, in 10 out of 11 the residual sinus was aerated and draining well. In one out of three patients where the periphery of the sinus was ablated, there was infection, two of three sinuses were aerated. Evaluating the experience in these 39 patients and our recent experience, obliteration of the sinus with muscle is very unreliable and the use of bone wax is obsolete. Covering a bisected or peripherally opened sinus with fascia or a galea periosteal flap will yield a well aerated and draining sinus, provided the naso-frontal duct is intact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bergara AR, Itoiz AO (1955) Present state of the surgical treatment of chronic frontal sinusitis. Arch Otolaryngol 61: 616–628

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bordley JE, Bosley WR (1973) Mucoceles of the frontal sinus: causes and treatment. Ann Otol 82: 696–702

    Google Scholar 

  3. Donald PJ (1979) The tenacity of frontal sinus mucosa. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg 87: 557–566

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goodale RL (1965) Obliteration of the frontal sinus. Ann Otol 74: 831–839

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goodale RL (1965) The rationale of frontal sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 75: 981–987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hybels RL, Newman MH (1977) Posterior table fractures of the frontal sinus: I. An experimental study. Laryngoscope 87: 71–179

    Google Scholar 

  7. Malis LI (1985) Surgical resection of tumors of the skull base. In: Wilkins RH, Rengachary SS (eds) Neurosurgery. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1011 p

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mann W (1977) Neue diagnostische Möglichkeiten bei Entzündungen der Nasennebenhöhlen. Habilitationsschrift Med. FakultÄt, Freiburg

  9. Mann W (1984) Ultraschall im Kopf-Hals-Bereich. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  10. May M, Ogura JH, Schramm V (1970) Nasofrontal duct in frontal sinus fractures. Arch Otolaryngol 92: 534–539

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McCoy G (1963) Cerebrospinal rhinorrhea. Laryngoscope 73: 1125–1156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McNeill RA (1967) Surgical obliteration of the maxillary sinus. Laryngoscope 77: 202–217

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Messerklinger W (1967) über die Drainage der menschlichen Nasennebenhöhlen unter normalen und pathologischen Bedingungen. 2. Mitteilung: Die Stirnhöhle und ihr Ausführungsgangsystem. Mschr Ohrenheilk 101: 313–326

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Montgomery WW, Pierce DL (1963) Anterior osteoplastic fat obliteration for frontal sinus: clinical experience and animal studies. Trans Am Acad Ophthal Otolaryngol 67: 46–57

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ojemann RG (1982) Basal frontal meningeomas. In: Schmidek HH, Sweet WH (eds) Operative neurosurgical techniques. Grune & Stratton, New York London Paris, 549 p

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schenk NL, Rauchbach E, Ogura JH (1974) Frontal sinus disease: II. Development of the frontal sinus model: Occlusion of the nasofrontal duct. Laryngoscope 84: 1233–1247

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schenk NL (1975) Frontal sinus disease: III. Experimental and clinical factors in failure of the frontal osteoplastic operation. Laryngoscope 85: 76–92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Seeger W (1983) Microsurgery of the cranial-base. Frontobasal Operations. Springer, Wien New York, Figs. 100 ff

    Google Scholar 

  19. Som PM (1985) CT of paranasal sinuses. Neuroradiology 27: 189–201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Walsh TE (1943) Experimental surgery of the frontal sinus: the role of the ostium and the nasofrontal duct in postoperative healing. Larnygoscope 84: 75–92

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zonis RD, Montgomery WW, Goodale RL (1966) Frontal sinus disease: 100 cases treated by osteoplastic operation. Laryngoscope 76: 1816–1476

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mann, W., Riechelmann, H. & Gilsbach, J. The state of the frontal sinus after craniotomy. Acta neurochir 100, 101–103 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01403593

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01403593

Keywords

Navigation