Skip to main content
Log in

Cattle feeding deterrents emitted from cattle feces

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cattle avoid grazing forage near their feces on pasture for more than a month. The relation of cattle feces odor to the rejection was studied in feeding choice tests using cattle. The feeding deterrent of feces odor was investigated using a trough partitioned to allow passage of feces odor through test food to the cattle. The cattle did not feed from the trough containing feces 0–35 days after excretion. Volatile chemicals isolated from feces 0–35 days after excretion by a cold trap method also inhibited cattle from feeding. These results demonstrated that feces odor is a major cause of the unpalatability of forage around cattle feces. The volatile chemicals were separated into ether and aqueous fractions. The ether fraction inhibited the feeding behavior of cattle. Furthermore, the ether fraction was separated into neutral, acidic, and basic fractions. The neutral fraction of the three was bioactive. These results suggested that specific volatile chemicals emitted from cattle feces were deterrents to the feeding behavior of cattle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, G.W. 1966a. The special senses in grazing animals. I. Sight and dietary habits in sheep.Aust. J. Agric. Res. 17:521–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, G.W. 1966b. The special senses in grazing animals. II. Smell, taste, and touch and dietary habits in sheep.Aust. J. Agric. Res. 17:531–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, G.W., andHill, J.L. 1972. Chemical factors affecting selection of food plants by ruminants, pp. 71–101,in J.B. Harbourne (ed.). Phytochemical Ecology. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, G.W., De Boer, E.S., andBoundy, C.A.P. 1980. The influence of odour and taste on the food preferences and food intake of sheep.Aust. J. Agric. Res. 31:571–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castle, M.E., andMacDaid, E. 1972. The decomposition of cattle dung and its effect on pasture.J. Br. Grossl. Soc. 27:133–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, J.F.D., andReid, G.W. 1968. The effects of grazing intensity on herbage consumption and animal production. HI. Dairy cows grazed at two intensities on clean or contaminated pasture.J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 71:223–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDiarmid, B.N., andWatkin, B.R. 1972. The cattle dung patch. 3. Distribution and rate of decay of dung patches and their influence on grazing behaviour.J. Br. Grossl. Soc. 27:48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLusky, D.S. 1960. Some estimates of the areas of pasture fouled by the excreta of dairy cows.J. Br. Grossl. Soc. 15:181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marnane, N.J., Matthews, L.R., Kilgour, R., andHawke, M. 1982. Prevention of bark chewing of pine trees by cattle: The effectiveness of repellents.Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 42:61–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marten, G.C., andDonker, J.D. 1964a. Selective grazing induced by animal excreta. I. Evidence of occurrence and superficial remedy.J. Dairy Sci. 47:773–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marten, G.C., andDonker, J.D. 1964b. Selective grazing induced by animal excreta. II. Investigation of a causal theory.J. Dairy Sci. 47:871–874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marten, G.C., andDonker, J.D. 1966. Animal excrement as a factor influencing acceptability of grazed forage, pp. 359–363,in Proceedings, 10th International Grassland Congress, Helsinki.

  • Norman, M.J.T., andGreen, J.O. 1958. The local influence of cattle dung and urine upon the yield and botanical composition of permanent pasture.J. Br. Grossl. Soc. 13:39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plice, M.J. 1951. Sugar versus the intuitive choice of foods by livestock.Agron. J. 43:341–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tayler, J.C., andLarge, R.V. 1955. The comparative output of two seeds mixtures.J. Br. Grassl. Soc. 10:341–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tayler, J.C., andRudman, J.E. 1966. The distribution of herbage at different heights in grazed and dung patch areas of a sward under two methods of grazing management.J. Agric. Sci. 66:29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voisin, A. 1959. Grass productivity. Trans. Herriot, C.T.M. Philosophical Library, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeda, W.C. 1967. The effect of cattle dung patches on pasture growth, botanical composition, and pasture utilization.N.Z. J. Agric. Res. 10:150–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, R.F., andPhipps, R.H. 1989. Preliminary studies on the effect of flavouring agents on the dry-matter intake of silage by lactating dairy cows.J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 112:67–71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dohi, H., Yamada, A. & Entsu, S. Cattle feeding deterrents emitted from cattle feces. J Chem Ecol 17, 1197–1203 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01402943

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01402943

Key words

Navigation