Skip to main content
Log in

Evidence for a two-component external marking pheromone system in an aphid hyperparasitoid

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The megaspilidDendrocerus carpenteri (Curtis) is a solitary ectohyperparasitoid of aphid primary parasitoids. It avoids superparasitism, but the avoidance rate depends on the amount of time elapsed after the first oviposition. In addition, females discriminate in a time-dependent manner between hosts parasitized by themselves and hosts parasitized by conspecifics. They recognize parasitized hosts by means of two externally perceivable chemical markers that are deposited on the mummy shell. One of the markers is highly active, short-lived, not passable through gas chromatography (GC), and freezing sensitive; the other is moderately active, persistent, GC-passable and freezing tolerant. Using two markers is believed to be advantageous for the hyperparasitoid female, as their ratio provides information on mark age and on the producer of the mark (the female herself or a conspecific female).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennett, F.D. 1981. Hyperparasitism in the practice of biological control, pp. 43–49,in D. Rosen (ed.). The Role of Hyperparasitism in Biological Control: A Symposium. Division of Agricultural Sciences, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocchino, F.J., andSullivan, D.J. 1981. Effects of venoms from two aphid hyperparasitoids,Asaphes lucens andDendrocerus carpenteri (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae and Megaspilidae), on larvae ofAphidius smithi (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae).Can. Entomol. 113:887–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee, R.G., andSilverstein, R.M. 1968. A micro-preparative gas Chromatograph and a modified carbon skeleton determinator.Anal. Chem. 40:2077–2079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, F.J., andMackauer, M. 1986. Host discrimination and larval competition in the aphid parasiteEphedrus californicus.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 41:243–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessart, P. 1972. Révision des espèces européennes du genreDendrocerus Ratzeburg, 1852 (Hymenoptera Ceraphronoidea).Mem. Soc. R. Belge Entomol. 32:1–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillot, F.S., andVinson, S.B. 1972. Sources of substances which elicit a behavioural response from the insect parasitoid,Campoletis perdistinctus.Nature 235:169–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillot, F.S., Joiner, R.L., andVinson, S.B. 1974. Host discrimination: Isolation of hydrocarbons from Dufour's gland of a braconid parasitoid.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 67:720–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, E.G., Fisher, R.C., andRoss, K.M. 1985. The temporal effects of Dufour's gland secretion in host discrimination byNemeritis canescens.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 38:215–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haviland, M.D. 1920. On the bionomics and development ofLygocerus testaceimanus, Kieffer, andLygocerus cameroni, Kieffer (Proctotrypoidea-Ceraphronidae), parasites ofAphidius (Braconidae).Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 65:101–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höller, C. (1988). Effizienzanalyse der Parasitoiden an Getreideblattläusen. PhD thesis. University of Kiel.

  • Hofsvang, T. 1988. Mechanisms of host discrimination and intraspecific competition in the aphid parasitoidEphedrus cerasicola.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 48:233–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, S.F., Marris, G., Reynolds, A., andRowe, G.W. 1987. Adaptive patterns in the avoidance of superparasitism by solitary parasitic wasps.J. Anim. Ecol. 56:387–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Ralec, A. 1988. Study on the modelSitobion avenae-Aphidius uzbekistanicus-Dendrocerus carpenteri: The hyperparasitoid ovipositor, sting, egg and first instars of development, pp. 125–126,in B. Bouletreau and G. Bonnot (eds.). Parasitoid Insects. Les Colloques de l'INRA No. 48, INRA, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D.C. 1956. Studies on parasite oviposition behaviour. IMastrus carpocapsae Cushman. (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae).Can. Entomol. 88:80–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudd, A., Fisher, R.C., andSmith, M.C. 1982. Volatile hydrocarbons of the Dufour's gland of the parasiteNemeretis canescens (Grav.) (Hymenoptera; Ichneumonidae).J. Chem. Ecol. 8:1035–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, J.W.S. 1938. Proprioception in insects.J. Exp. Biol. 15:101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D.J. 1972. The ichneumon waspVenturia canescens: Oviposition and the avoidance of superparasitism.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 15:190–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roitberg, B.D., andMangel, M. 1988. On the evolutionary ecology of marking pheromones.Evol. Ecol. 2:289–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, G. 1937. Experimental studies in insect parasitism. V. The sense used byTrichogramma to distinguish between parasitized and unparasitized hosts.Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B. 122:57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stary, P. 1977.Dendrocerus hyperparasites of aphids in Czechoslovakia (Hymenoptera, Ceraphronoidea).Acta Entomol. Bohemoslov. 74:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, D.J. 1988. Hyperparasites, pp. 189–204,in A.K. Minks and P. Harrewijn (eds.). Aphids. Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Vol. B. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takada, H. 1973. Studies on aphid hyperparasites of Japan. I. Aphid hyperparasites of the genusDendrocerus Ratzeburg (Hymenoptera: Ceraphronidae).Insecta Matsum. 2:1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Alphen, J.J.M., andVisser, M.E. 1990. Superparasitism as an adaptive strategy for insect parasitoids.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 35:000–000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Bosch, R. 1981. Specifity of hyperparasites, pp. 27–33,in D. Rosen (ed.). The Role of Hyperparasitism in Biological Control: A Symposium. Division of Agricultural Sciences, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lenteren, J.C. 1981. Host discrimination by parasitoids, pp. 153–179,in D.A. Nordlund, R.L. Jones, and W.J. Lewis (eds.). Semiochemicals, Their Role in Pest Control. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lenteren, J.C., andDe Bach, P. 1981. Host discrimination in three ectoparasites (Aphytis coheni, A. lingnanensis andA. melinus) of the oleander scale (Aspidiotus nerii).Neth. J. Zool. 31:504–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, S.B. 1977. Behavioral chemicals in the augmentation of natural enemies, pp. 237–279,in R.L. Ridgway and S.B. Vinson (eds.). Biological Control by Augmentation of Natural Enemies. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, S.B. 1984. Parasitoid-host relationship, pp. 205–233,in W.J. Bell and R.T. Cardé (eds.). Chemical Ecology of Insects. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, S.B., andGuillot, F.S. 1972. Host marking: Source of a substance that results in host discrimination in insect parasitoids.Entomophaga 17:241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Völkl, W., andMackauer, M. 1990. Age-specific pattern of host discrimination by the parasitoidEphedrus californicus Baker (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae).Can. Entomol. 122:349–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G.P., andCameron, P.J. 1981. The biology ofDendrocerus carpenteri (Hymenoptera: Ceraphronidae), a parasite ofAphidius species, and field observations ofDendrocerus species as hyperparasites ofAcyrthosiphon.N.Z. J. Zool. 8:531–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, H. 1987. [The role of venom in host discrimination of Ascogaster reticulatus Watnabe.] In Japanese.Jpn. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 31:80–82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HÖller, C., Williams, H.J. & Vinson, S.B. Evidence for a two-component external marking pheromone system in an aphid hyperparasitoid. J Chem Ecol 17, 1021–1035 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01402931

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01402931

Key words

Navigation