Skip to main content

“Standard” microsurgical lumbar discectomy vs. “conservative” microsurgical discectomy A preliminary study


The “conservative” microsurgical lumbar discectomy described by Williams for the treatment of herniated lumbar disc is compared in a retrospective study with the standard microsurgical technique of Caspar and Loew. In order to enable such a retrospective comparison, a special randomization had to be chosen. The data concerning outcome are based on a questionnaire, in which the patient can describe his actual health situation. The result in the group of 56 patients operated on by the Williams technique with a mean follow-up of 27 months is excellent or good in 89% vs. 74% in the standard technique group. Reoperations due to a recurrence were identical in both groups (3.6% and 3.9%).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. Caspar W (1977) A new surgical procedure for lumbar disc herniation causing less tissue damage through a microsurgical approach. Advances in neurosurgery 4: 74–81. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ebeling U, Reichenbach W, Reulen HJ (1986) Results of microsurgical lumbar discectomy. Review on 485 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 81: 45–52

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ebeling U, Kalbarcyk H, Reulen HJ, (1989) Microsurgical reoperation following lumbar disc surgery. Timing, surgical findings and outcome in 92 patients. J Neurosurg 70(3): 397–404

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gould HJ (1978) Microlumbar discectomy. Follow-up of 147 patients. Spine 3(2): 183–185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gould HJ (1979) Microsurgical removal of lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus. Surg Gynecol Obstet 149(2): 247–248

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gould HJ (1981) Microlumbar discectomy: follow-up of 477 patients. J Microsurg 2(2): 95–100

    Google Scholar 

  7. Loew F, Caspar W (1978) Surgical approach to lumbar disc herniations. The microsurgical approach. Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, Vol 4. Springer, Wien New York, pp 153–171

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rogers LA (1988) Experience with limited versus extensive disc removal in patients undergoing microsurgical operations for ruptured lumbar discs. Neurosurgery 22(1): 82–85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Spengler D (1982) Lumbar discectomy. Results with limited disc excision and selective foraminotomy. Spine 7(6): 604–607

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Williams RW (1978) Microlumbar discectomy. A conservative surgical approach to the virgin herniated lumbar disc. Spine 3(2): 175–182

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Williams RW (1986) Microlumbar discectomy — A 12-year statistical review. Spine 11(8): 851–852

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson DH, Kenning J (1979) Microsurgical lumbar discectomy: preliminary report of 83 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery 4(2): 137–140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson DH, Harbaugh R (1982) Lumbar discectomy: a comparative study of microsurgical and standard technique. Lumbar disc disease. New York, pp 147–156

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Striffeler, H., Gröger, U. & Reulen, H.J. “Standard” microsurgical lumbar discectomy vs. “conservative” microsurgical discectomy A preliminary study. Acta neurochir 112, 62–64 (1991).

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: