Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical evaluation of a new epidural pressure monitor

  • Technical Notes
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Comparative measuring of epidural pressure using the Spiegelberg probe 1 and ventricular fluid pressure was carried out in 15 neurosurgical intensive-care patients. Deviations in both directions were established, with a trend toward overestimating ventricular pressure in epidural pressure measuring (r=0.77). Individual pulsations, spontaneous wave courses and therapy-induced pressure changes were reflected without delays. There were no complications observed with probe implantation periods for up to 6 days. The system has been shown to be mechanically stable and easy to implant. We believe the device to be fit for trend monitoring of intracranial pressure. As with other epidural pressure monitoring systems, false assessments of ventricular pressure may lead to wrong decisions as to the required therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aschoff A, Betsch M, Benesch Ch, Von Haken M, Steiner H, Wirtz R (1990) Vier epidurale ICP-Transducer im Systemvergleich. Presented at the 41th Annual Meeting of the German Neurosurgical Society, Düsseldorf

  2. Clemente G, Lazorthes Y, Aragon B, Richard J (1983) Critical study of coplanarity. The dura mater as measurement interface of the intracranial pressure by the epidural method In: Ishii S, Nagai H, Brock M (eds) Intracranial pressure V. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 79–83

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dorsch NWC, Symon L (1975) A practical technique for monitoring extradural pressure. J Neurosurg 42: 249–257

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Esparza J, Manrique A, Lobato RD, Lamas E (1980) Simultaneous epidural and intraventricular pressure measurement during the occurrence of supratentorial expanding lesions. In: Shulman K, Marmarou A, Miller JD, Becker DP, Hochwald GM, Brock M (eds) Intracranial pressure IV. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 377–380

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feldman Z, Narayan RK (1993) Intracranial pressure monitoring: techniques and pitfalls. In: Cooper PR (ed) Head injury, 3rd Ed. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 263–267

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gaab MR, Heissler HE (1984) ICP monitoring. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 11 (3): 189–250

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kosteljanetz M, Borgesen SE, Stjernholm P, Christensen L, Osgaard O, Gjerris F, Rosenorm J (1986) Clinical evaluation of a simple epidural pressure sensor. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 83:108–111

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maas AIR, deJong DA (1986) The Rotterdam teletransducer: telemetric epidural pressure monitoring. Results of comparative EDP-VFP measurements. In: Miller JD, Teasdale GM, Rowan JO, Galbraith SL, Mendelow AD (eds) Intracranial pressure VI. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 207–212

    Google Scholar 

  9. Martin G (1979) Some physical principles of intracranial pressure measurement. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg) 22: 129–136

    Google Scholar 

  10. Powell MP, Crockard HA (1985) Behaviour of an extradural pressure monitor in clinical use. J Neurosurg 63: 745–749

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schettini A, Mahig J (1972) Intracranial pressure measurements and rheological behaviour of the intracranial system in dogs. J Neurosurg 37: 170–176

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Czech, T., Korn, A., Reinprecht, A. et al. Clinical evaluation of a new epidural pressure monitor. Acta neurochir 125, 169–172 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01401846

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01401846

Keywords

Navigation