Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Carpal tunnel syndrome: Neurographical parameters in different stages of median nerve compression

  • Clinical Articles
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In a series of 47 cases and 55 hands operated upon for carpal tunnel syndrome, the pre-operative electrodiagnostic findings have been compared retrospectively with the morphological findings within the carpal tunnel during operation.

As a main result there was no significant correlation between the degree of electrophysiological changes and the degree of median nerve compression. Only the lack of any motor or sensory response seems to indicate a more severe median nerve compression.

In about 20% of cases with operatively proven marked median nerve compression, both distal motor latency and motor nerve conduction velocity were well within normal limits and would not have led to the diagnosis of a carpal tunnel syndrome in these cases.

The diagnosis, therefore, cannot be made on the basis of electrodiagnostic pathological values only of distal motor latency and motor nerve conduction velocity, but has to take into account as well the sensory nerve conduction velocity as well as the clinical picture and neurological findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aebi-Ochsner Ch, Ludin HP (1979) Das Carpaltunnelsyndrom — klinische Symptomatologie und elektrophysiologische Befunde. Neurol Psychiatr 47: 307–319

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buchthal F, Rosenfalk A, Trojaborg W (1974) Electrophysiological findings in entrapment of the median nerve at the wrist and elbow. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 37: 340–360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Duensing F, Lowitsch K, Thorwirth V, Vogel P (1974) Neurophysiologische Befunde beim Carpaltunnelsyndrom. Z Neurol 206: 267–284

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fardin P, Negrin P, Carteri A (1979) Clinical and electromyographical considerations on 150 cases of carpal tunnel syndrome. Acta Neurol Scand 73: 121

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harris CM, Tanner E, Goldstein MN, Pettee DS (1979) The surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome correlated with preoperative nerve conduction studies. J Bone Joint Surg 61-A, 1: 93–98

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leblhuber F, Reisecker F (1985) Carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neurol 232: 60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Liveson and Spielholz (1979) Peripheral Neurology, case studies in Electrodiagnosis. FA Davis Company/Philadelphia, pp 20–22

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ludin HP, Lütschg J, Valsangiacomo F (1977) Vergleichende Untersuchung orthodromer und antidromer sensibler Nervenleitgeschwindigkeiten, 1. Befunde bei Normalen und beim Karpaltunnelsyndrom. Z EEG-EMG 8: 173–179

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ludin HP, Tackmann W (1979) Sensible Neurographie. G. Thieme, Stuttgart pp 70–73

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mumenthaler M (1974) Charakteristische Krankheitsbilder nicht unmittelbar traumatischer peripherer Nervenschäden. Nervenarzt 45: 61–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mühlau G, Both R, Kunath H (1984) Carpal tunnel syndrome-course and prognosis. J Neurol 231: 83–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tachibana S, Ohwada T, Yada K (1979) Prognosis in carpal tunnel syndrome: a comparison between the natural history and operative treatment. Acta Neurol Scand 73: 120

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leblhuber, F., Reisecker, F. & Witzmann, A. Carpal tunnel syndrome: Neurographical parameters in different stages of median nerve compression. Acta neurochir 81, 125–127 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01401233

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01401233

Keywords

Navigation