Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The assimilation—pluralism debate: Toward a postmodern resolution of the American ethnoracial dilemma

  • American Identities and Multi-Cultural Realitites
  • Published:
International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References Notes

  1. Seymour Martin Lipset,The First New Nation: The United States in Historical and Comparative Perspective (New York: W. W. Norton, 1979), esp. pp. v-vl, 207–348.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, e.g., Kingsley Davis, “American Society: Its Group Structure,”Contemporary Civilization 2, (Chicago: Scott, Foresman and Co., 1961), pp. 171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Leonard Broom and John Kitsuse, “The Validation of Acculturation: A Condition of Ethnic Assimilation,”American Anthropologist, LVII (February, 1955), pp. 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Harold J. Abramson, “Assimilation and Pluralism,”Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups, ed. by Stephan Thernstrom, (Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1980), pp. 150–160.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Hector, St. John de Crevecoeur,Letters From an American Farmer, (New York: E. P. Dutton, 1957 [1782]) pp. 35–82.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Israel Zangwill,The Melting-Pot: Drama in Four Acts new and revised edn., (New York: Macmillan, 1922 [1909]) esp. pp. 184–185.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Horace Kallen,Culture and Democracy in the United States: Studies in the Group Psychology of the American Peoples, (New York: Boni and Liveright, 1924; reprint, New York: Arno Press and the New York Times, 1970), pp. 67–232.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Randolph S. Bourne,War and the Intellectuals: Collected Essays, 1915–1919, ed. by Carl Resek, (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1964), pp. 107–133.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See John Doyle Klier,Russia Gathers Her Jews: The Origins of the “Jewish Question” in Russia. 1772–1825, (DeKalb, Ill.: Northern Illinois University Press, 1986); and M. J. Rosman,The Lords' Jews: Magnate-Jewish Relations in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth During the Eighteenth Century, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karl Marx, “On the Jewish Question,”Early Texts, trans. and ed. by David McLellan, (Oxford, U.K.: Basil Blackwell, 1972), p. 114.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Julius Carlebach,Karl Marx and the Radical Critique of Judaism, (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978), p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

  12. , p. 313. See also two works by David McLellan,The Young Hegelians and Karl Marx, (London: Macmillan, 1969), pp. 75–81; andMarxism and Religion: A Description and Assessment of the Marxist Critique of Christianity, (New York: Harper and Row, 1987), pp. 8, 10–13, 67–69; and Dennis Fischmann,Political Discourse in Exile: Karl Marx and the Jewish Question, (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1991), pp. 3–120.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Saul K. Padover,Karl Marx: An Intimate Biography, (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978), pp. 1–30. For a thoughtful discussion of Marxism as a religion in its own right, as well as its relation to Judaism and Christianity, see Robert John Ackerman,Religion As Critique, (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1985), pp. 31–35, 43–48, 65–76, 142–152.

    Google Scholar 

  14. , p. 314. Judaism itself underwent a divisive sectarian turn toward mystical fundamentalism in the eleventh, twelfth, and thirteenth centuries. It is the thesis of Jose Faur,In the Shadow of History: Jews and Conversosat the Dawn of Modernity, (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992), that mystical and fundamentalist Judaism undermined the Maimonidean legalist tradition of Andalusian Jewry, and inadvertently contributed to the vulnerability of Spain's Jews to the horrors of the Inquisition. The appearance ofconversos, some of whom were secret Jews, fostered a debate over whether assimilation or pluralism would be the best way to preserve Jewish life, liberty, and property. Spinoza's heresy and its effects are regarded as a wrong and harmful move by Faur, who credits R. Solomon ibn Verga (?—c. 1520), a philosopher who abjured categories, favored historical rationality, proposed a veritable forerunner of symbolic interaction, subjectivity, and cultural and religious pluralism, as being the harbinger of postmodern society. Faur's remarkable thesis should be read in relation to such earlier commentators on the role of Spinoza's heresy for modernity, the Enlightenment, and Occidental social, cultural, and political formations as Leo Strauss,Spinoza's Critique of Religion, (New York: Schocken Books, 1965); two works by Lewis Samuel Feuer,Spinoza and the Rise of Liberalism, (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1987) andThe Scientific Intellectual: The Psychological and Sociological Origin of Modern Science, (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1992), pp. 297–318; and Yirmiyahu Yovel,Spinoza and Other Heretics, Vol. I: The Marrano of Reason, Vol. II: The Adventures of Immanence, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Jurgen Herbst,The German Historical School in American Scholarship: A Study in the Transfer of Culture, (Port Washington, N.Y.: Kennikat Press, 1972), pp. 129–230; and Albion W. Small, “Fifty Years of Sociology in the United States (1865–1915),”American Journal of Sociology, XXI:6 (May, 1916), pp. 721–864.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sarah E. Simons, “Social Assimilation,”American Journal of Sociology, VI:6 (May, 1901), pp. 808–815; VII:1 (July, 1901), pp. 53–79, VII:2 (September, 1901), pp. 234–248; VII:3 (November, 1901), pp. 386–404; VII:4 (January, 1902), pp. 539–556.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gary A. Abraham,Max Weber and the Jewish Question: A Study in the Social Outlook of his Sociology, (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1992), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See Werner Sombart,The Jews and Modern Capitalism, trans. by M. Epstein, (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  19. , p. 231.

    Google Scholar 

  20. , p. 269.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See Ellsworth Faris, “If I Were a Jew,” inThe Nature of Human Nature and Other Essays in Social Psychology, (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1937; reprint, Dubuque, Ia.: Brown Reprints, 1971), pp. 350–353.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Robert N. Bellah, Richard Madsen, William M. Sullivan, Ann Swidler, and Steven M. Tipton,Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life, (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985), p. 237.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Robert N. Bellah, Richard Madsen, William M. Sullivan, Ann Swidler, and Steven M. Tipton,The Good Society, (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1991), p. 306.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Theodor Mommsen,Auch ein Wort ueber unser Judentum, (Berlin: Weidmannische Buchhandlung, 1880), pp. 1–16. Translated as “Another Word About Our Jewry” by J. Hessing and published inThe Jew in the Modern World: A Documentary History, ed. by Paul R. Mendes-Flohr and Jehuda Reinharz, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1980), pp. 284–287. Quotation from p. 286.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Max Weber, “Science as a Vocation,” inFrom Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, trans. and ed. by Hans H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1946), p. 156.

    Google Scholar 

  26. See Theodor Herzl,The Jewish State, (New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1988), pp. 67–157. See also Ernest Pawel,The Labyrinth of Exile: A Life of Theodor Herzl, (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1989); and Steven Beller,Herzl, (New York: Grove Weidenfeld, 1991), esp. pp. 35–61, 107–126. For the debate over which values—those of the “old Yishuv” in pre-Zionist Palestine, or those of the “enlightened” Zionists fromfin-de-siecle Europe—should prevail in the Jewish homeland, see Jeff Halper,Between Redemption and Revival: The Jewish Yishuv of Jerusalem in the Nineteenth Century, (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  27. , p. 287.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  29. , pp. 40, 44, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  30. , p. 184.

    Google Scholar 

  31. , p. 199.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See Gerald Sorin,The Prophetic Minority: American Jewish Immigrant Radicals, 1880–1920, (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  33. See Jessa Weissman Joselit,Our Gang: Jewish Crime and the New York Jewish Community, 1900–1940, (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1983); Arthur A. Goren,New York Jews and the Quest for Community: The Kehillah Experiment, 1908–1922 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1970); Albert Fried,The Rise and Fall of the Jewish Gangster in America, (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  34. See Egal Feldman,The Dreyfus Affair and the American Conscience: 1895–1906, (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  35. See Albert S. Lindemann,The Jew Accused: Three Anti-Semitic Affairs (Dreyfus, Beilis, Frank) 1894–1915, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991); and Abraham G. Duker, “Twentieth-Century Blood Libels in the United States,” in the Blood Libel Legend: A Casebook in Anti-Semitic Folklore, ed. by Alan Dundes, (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991), pp. 233–260.

    Google Scholar 

  36. See John Higham,Send These To Me: Jews and Other Immigrants in Urban America, (New York: Atheneum, 1975), pp. 138–220.

    Google Scholar 

  37. , p. 203.

    Google Scholar 

  38. , p. 205. See also Howard M. Sachar,A History of the Jews in America, (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1992), pp. 418–427.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Quoted from pp. 321–322 of William James's book of 1909,A Pluralistic Universe, in, p. 206.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Horace Kallen, “Democracy Versus the Melting Pot,”The Nation, C (February 18 and 25, 1915) is reprinted in Kallen,op. cit. Horace Kallen,Culture and Democracy in the United States: Studies in the Group Psychology of the American Peoples, (New York: Boni and Liveright, 1924; reprint, New York: Arno Press and the New York Times, 1970), pp. 67–125.

  41. , pp. 206–208.

    Google Scholar 

  42. , p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  43. , pp. 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  44. , p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  45. , p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  46. , p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  48. , p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Herbert Blumer, “Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position,”Pacific Sociological Review, I (Spring, 1958), pp. 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Gunnar Myrdal with the assistance of Richard Sterner and Arnold Rose,An American Dilemma, (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1944).

  51. , p. 205.

    Google Scholar 

  52. , pp. 204–205.

    Google Scholar 

  53. , p. 206.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  56. . pp. 206–207.

    Google Scholar 

  57. . p. 207.

    Google Scholar 

  58. , p. 206.

    Google Scholar 

  59. , p. 207.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Horace M. Kallen, “Humanistic Sources of Democracy,”The Liberal Spint: Essays on Problems of Freedom in the Modern World, (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1948), pp. 169–170.

    Google Scholar 

  61. , p. 178.

    Google Scholar 

  62. See Horace Meyer Kallen,William James and Henri Bergson: A Study in Contrasting Theories of Life, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1914), pp. 206–242.

    Google Scholar 

  63. , p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Kallen, “Humanistic Sources of Democracy,”, p. 190.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Quoted in Edward Abrahams,The Lyrical Left: Randolph Bourne, Alfred Stieglitz and the Origins of Cultural Radicalism in America, (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1986), p. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  66. , pp. 112–113.

    Google Scholar 

  67. , p. 226, n. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Peter Kivisto, “The Transplanted Then and Now: The Reorientation of Immigration Studies From the Chicago School to the New Social History,”Ethnic and Racial Studies, XIII:4 (October, 1990), pp. 455–481, esp. pp. 463–468.

    Google Scholar 

  69. For the details of this encounter, see Ralph E. Luker,The Social Gospel in Black and White: American Racial Reform, 1885–1912, (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  70. See Lillian D. Wald,The House on Henry Street, (New York: Henry Holt, 1915; reprint, New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 1991), pp. 97–100, 216–219, 252–254, 263–266, 270–272, 302–303, 308.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Residents of Hull House,Hull House Maps and Papers: A Presentation of Nationalities and Wages in a Congested District of Chicago, Together With Comments and Essays on Problems Growing Out of the Social Conditions, (New York: Thomas Y. Crowell, 1895, reprint, New York: Arno Press, and the New York Times, 1970), esp. pp. 91–114, 115–130, 131–142, 207–230; Arthur C. Holden,The Settlement Idea, (New York: Macmillan, 1922; reprint, New York: Arno Press and the New York Times, 1970); Robert A. Woods and Albert J. Kennedy,The Settlement Horizon, (New York: Russell Sage, 1922; reprint, New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 1990), pp. 326–340.

  72. See Stanford M. Lyman,Militarism Imperialism, and Racial Accommodation: An Analysis and Interpretation of the Early Writings of Robert E. Park, (Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press, 1992), pp. 41–135, 205–305.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Booker T. Washington with the collaboration of Robert E. Park,The Man Farthest Down: A Record of Observation and Study in Europe, (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, Page, 1912; reprint, New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  74. See, e.g., H. A. Millis,The Japanese Problem in the United States, (New York: Macmillan, 1915; and James A. B. Scherer,The Japanese Crisis, (New York: Frederick A. Stokes Co., 1916).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Robert E. Park, “Racial Assimilation in Secondary Groups With Particular Reference to the Negro,” inRace and Culture, The Collected Papers of Robert Ezra Park, Vol. I, ed. by Everett Cherrington Hughes, Charles S. Johnson, Jitsuichi Masuoka, Robert Redfield, and Louis Wirth, (Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1950), pp. 208–209.

    Google Scholar 

  76. See Stow Persons,Ethnic Studies at Chicago, 1905–1945, (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1987), pp. 77–97.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Judith Ann Trolander,Settlement Houses and the Great Depression, (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1975), p. 134.

    Google Scholar 

  78. , p. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Ibid.Judith Ann Trolander,Settlement Houses and the Great Depression, (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1975), pp. 27–28.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Aaron Berman,Nazism, The Jews and American Zionism, 1933–1948, (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1990), p. 181.

    Google Scholar 

  82. See Robert G. Goldy,The Emergence of Jewish Theology in America, (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990; and Abraham J. Peck, ed.,Jews and Christians After the Holocaust, (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  83. See Peter Grose,Israel in the Mind of America, (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1983), pp. 46–318; and Robert W. Ross,So It Was True: The American Protestant Press and the Persecution of the Jews (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  84. See Edward Alexander,The Jewish Idea and Its Enemies: Personalities, Issues, Events, (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 1991), pp. 77–96, 143–164. Alexander's work is polemical and should be read in relation to the writings ofTikkun editor Michael Lerner, cited in n. 90,infra.

    Google Scholar 

  85. See Howard M. Sachar,, pp. 563–594; Milton Plesur,Jewish Life in Twentieth-Century America: Challenge and Accommodation, (Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1982), pp. 131–205; Nathan C. Belth,A Promise to Keep: A Narrative of the American Encounter With Anti-Semitism, (New York: Schocken Books, 1981)., pp. 146–294; and Thomas A. Kolsky,Jews Against Zionism: The American Council for Judaism, 1942–1948, (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Quoted in Joseph H. Udelson,Dreamer of the Ghetto: The Life and Works of Israel Zangwill, (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1990), p. 194.

    Google Scholar 

  87. , p. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  88. See Gary Dean Best,To Free A People: American Jewish Leaders and the Jewish Problem in Eastern Europe, 1890–1914, (Westport, Ct.: Greenwood Press, 1982), pp. 218–223.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Ronald Sanders,The High Walls of Jerusalem: A History of the Balfour Declaration and the Birth of the British Mandate for Palestine, (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  90. See Herbert Blumer, “The Future of the Color Line,” in Stanford M. Lyman and Arthur Vidich,Social Order and the Public Philosophy: An Analysis and Interpretation of the Work of Herbert Blumer, (Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press, 1988), pp. 208–222. For the current version of the debates among and between blacks and Jews over assimilation, culture, and pluralism, see Jack Salzman,et al., eds.Bridges and Boundaries: African Americans and American Jews, (New York: George Braziller in association with the Jewish Museum, 1992); and the essays by Jesse Jackson, James McPherson, Cornel West, Marshall Berman, Arnold Eisen, Roger Perry and Patricia Williams, Rachel Adler, Arthur Waskow, and Jacob Neusner, inTikkun: A Jewish Critique of Politics. Culture and Society, ed. by Michael Lerner, (Oakland, Calif.: Tikkun Books, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  91. David Harvey,The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change, (Cambridge: Blackwell, 1990), p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Warren Montag, “What Is at Stake in the Debate on Postmodernism?” inPostmodernism and Its Discontents: Theories, Practices, ed. by E. Ann Kaplan, (London: Verso, 1988), pp. 88–103.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Henry Louis Gates, Jr., “Writing ‘Race’ and the Difference It Makes,” in, ed.,“Race”, Writing and Difference, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  94. See Winthrop D. Jordan,White Over Black: American Attitudes Toward the Negro, 1550–1812, (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1968). See also Dana D. Nelson,The Word in Black and White: Reading “Race” in American Literature, 1638–1867, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992). That the race question is an extension of the Jewish question—especially as that question arose in the century preceding the first voyage of Columbus and the expulsion of the Jews from Spain—both occurred in 1492 —is a feature of the challenging and original thesis of Jose Faur.

    Google Scholar 

  95. See two works by Lester F. Ward,Applied Sociology: A Treatise on the Conscious Improvement of Society by Society, (Boston: Ginn and Co., 1906), pp. 205–238; andPure Sociology: A Treatise on the Origin and Spontaneous Development of Society, 2nd edn., (New York: Macmillan, 1907; reprint, New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1970), pp. 108–110. See also the discussion of Ward's thesis in Arthur J. Vidich and Stanford M. Lyman,American Sociology: Worldly Rejections of Religion and Their Directions, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985), pp. 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Charles Johnson,Being and Race: Black Writing Since 1970, (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988), p. 123.

    Google Scholar 

  97. See Adam Begley, “Henry Louis Gates, Jr.: Black Studies' New Star,”New York Times Magazine, Section 6 (April 1, 1990), pp. 24–27, 48–50. For two of Gates's essays critically examining the depiction of blacks in earlier eras, see Henry Louis Gates, Jr., “From Wheatley to Douglass: The Politics of Displacement,” inFrederick Douglass: New Literary and Historical Essays, ed. by Eric J. Sundquist, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), pp. 47–65; and “The Trope of the New Negro and the Reconstruction of the Image of the Black,” inThe New American Studies: Essays from Representations, ed. by Philip Fisher, (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991), pp. 319–345.

  98. Henry Louis Gates, Jr.,Figures in Black: Words, Signs, and the “Racial” Self, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), pp. xxii-xxiv.

    Google Scholar 

  99. , p. xxvi. See also Henry Louis Gates, Jr.,Loose Canons: Notes on the Culture Wars, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), pp. 3–42, 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Henry Louis Gates, Jr., “Canon-Formation, Literary History, and the Afro-American Tradition: From the Seen to the Told,” inAfro-American Literary Study in the 1990s, ed. by Houston A. Baker, Jr.., and Patricia Redmond, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989), p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  101. , p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Quoted in, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  103. , pp. 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Jean Toomer,Cane, (New York: Harper and Row, 1969[1923]).

    Google Scholar 

  105. See James Haskins,Pinckney Benton Stewart Pinchback, (New York: Macmillan, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  106. Since the republication ofCane in 1969, there has been a veritable renaissance in Toomer studies. See, among many, Frank Durham, comp.,Studies in Cane, (Columbus: Charles E. Merrill, 1971); Darwin T. Turner,In a Minor Chord: Three Afro-American Writers and Their Search for Identity, (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1971), pp. 1–59; Brian Joseph Benson and Mable Mayle Dillard,Jean Toomer, (Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1980); Nellie Y. McKay,Jean Toomer, Artist: A study of His Literary Life and Work, 1894–1936, (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1984); Cynthia Earl Kerman and Richard Eldridge,The Lives of Jean Toomer: A Hunger for Wholeness, (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1987); Therman B. O'Daniel, ed.,Jean Toomer: A Critical Evaluation, (Washington, D C.: Howard University Press, 1988); Rudolph P. Byrd,Jean Toomer's Years with Gurdjieff: Portrait of an Artist, 1923–1936, (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1990). Republications of Toomer's works include, in addition toCane, citedsupra, The Wayward and the Seeking: A Collection of Writings by Jean Toomer, ed. by Darwin T. Turner, (Washington, D.C.: Howard University Press, 1980); andEssentials, ed. by Rudolph P. Byrd, (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  107. Jean Toomer, “Autobiographical Sketches: TheCane Years,” in The Wayward and the Seeking, ; p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  108. ,” in The Wayward and the Seeking, ; pp. 121–122.

    Google Scholar 

  109. pp. 121–122.

    Google Scholar 

  110. , p. 202.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Bernard W. Bell,The Afro-American Novel and Its Tradition, (Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press, 1987), p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  115. The most important essays of the Frazier-Herskovitz debate will be found in “Part III: The African Diaspora and Cultural Survivals: The Frazier-Herskovitz Debate,”Intergroup Relations: Sociological Perspectives, ed. by Pierre van den Berghe, (New York: Basic Books, 1972), pp. 103–136.

  116. See two works by Melville J. Herskovitz,The Myth of the Negro Past, (Boston: Beacon Press, 1958 [1941]); andThe New World Negro: Selected Papers in Afro-American Studies, ed. by Frances S. Herskovitz, (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1966), esp. pp. 83–134, 157–198, 321–361.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Melville J. Herskovitz,The American Negro: A Study in Racial Crossing, (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1964 [1928]).

    Google Scholar 

  118. p. viii.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Robert E. Park, “The Conflict and Fusion of Cultures With Special Reference to the Negro,”Journal of Negro History, IV:2 (April, 1919), pp. 111–133. See also my discussion of Park's concept of temperament in Stanford M. Lyman,Militarism, Imperialism, and Racial Accommodation: An Analysis and Interpretation of the Early Writings of Robert E. Park, op. cit., (Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press, 1992), pp. 106–112, 132. Park's essay is reprinted on pp. 290–305 of this book.

    Google Scholar 

  121. See Stanford M. Lyman and William A. Douglass “Ethnicity: Strategies of Collective and Individual Impression Management,”Social Research, XL:2 (Summer, 1973), pp. 344–365; William A. Douglass and Stanford M. Lyman, “L'Ethnie: Structure, Processus, et Saillance,” trans. by Alain Kihm,Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie, LXI (1976), pp. 197–220; and Stanford M. Lyman, “The Existential Self: Language and Silence in the Formation of Human Identity,” inidem, Civilization: Contents. Discontents, Malcontents and Other Essays in Social Theory, (Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press, 1990), pp. 250–258.

  122. Toni Morrison,Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination, The William E. Massey, Sr., Lectures in the History of American Civilization, 1990, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  123. . pp. 32, 33.

    Google Scholar 

  124. See two works by Bernard Bailyn,The Peopling of North America: An Introduction, (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1986); andVoyagers to the West: A Passage in the Peopling of America on the Eve of the Revolution, (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  125. Jacques Derrida,Speech and Phenomena and Other Essays on Husserl's Theory of Signs, trans. by David B. Allison, (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973), pp. 82 n. 8, 129 n. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  126. p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  127. . p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  128. . p. 47–48.

    Google Scholar 

  129. , p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  130. , p. 142. Emphasis supplied.

    Google Scholar 

  131. For the concept of the time track, see Stanford M. Lyman and Marvin B. Scott,A Sociology of the Absurd, 2nd edn., (Dix Hills, N.Y.: General Hall, Inc., 1989), pp. 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  132. , p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Joel Williamson,New People: Miscegenation and Mulattoes in the United States, (New York: The Free Press, 1980), p. 195.

    Google Scholar 

  134. See Charles C. Lemert, “The Uses of French Structuralisms in Sociology,” inFrontiers of Social Theory: The New Syntheses, ed. by George Ritzer, (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990), pp. 230–254. See also Richard Harvey Brown,Society as Text: Essays on Rhetoric, Reason and Reality, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987), esp. pp. 97–192; and Brown, ed.,Writing the Social Text: Poetics and Politics in Social Science Discourse, (New York: Aldine DeGruyter, 1992), esp. pp. 39–52, 91–116.

    Google Scholar 

  135. See two works by Nathan Glazer, and Daniel Patrick Moynihan,Beyond the Melting Pot: The Negroes, Puerto Ricans, Jews, Italians, and Irish of New York City, 2nd edn., (Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1970); and with Corinne S. Schelling, eds.,Ethnicity: Theory and Experience, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975), esp. pp. 1–266. For an earlier period see Joyce D. Goodfriend,Before the Melting Pot: Society and Culture in Colonial New York City, 1664–1730, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  136. Charles Silberman,Crisis in Black and White, (New York: Random House, 1964), p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  140. See e.g., the three essays on Frederick Douglass' narrative by Robert B. Stepto, Robert G. O'Meally, and Henry Louis Gates, Jr., inAfro-American Literature: The Reconstruction of Instruction, ed. by Dexter Fisher and Robert B. Stepto, (New York: Modern Language Association of America, 1979), pp. 171–232.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Roxana Robinson, “It's Not Easy Being a WASP,”—a review ofFalse Gods (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1992), by Louis Auchincloss,The New York Times Book Review, Sec. 7 (March 15, 1992), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  142. Robert E. Park, “The Nature of Race Relations,” in,Race Relations and the Race Problem, ed. by Edgar T. Thompson, (Durham: Duke, University Press, 1939), p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  143. Kwame Anthony Appiah,In My Father's House: Africa in the Philosophy of Culture, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), p. 143.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Gian Biagio Conte,The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets, trans. by Charles Segal, (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986), pp. 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Stanford M. Lyman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lyman, S.M. The assimilation—pluralism debate: Toward a postmodern resolution of the American ethnoracial dilemma. Int J Polit Cult Soc 6, 181–210 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01395298

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01395298

Keywords

Search

Navigation