Abstract
The results of 88 consecutive small-bowel enemas were compared retrospectively with the results of 52 routine small-bowel series and 50 barium enemas done in the same patients. Ninety-six percent of the diagnoses made by small-bowel enema were correct, as compared to only 65% made by routine small-bowel series. The incorrect studies were mostly false negatives and the abnormalities missed included regional enteritis, small-bowel obstruction, and intestinal lymphoma. The barium enema failed to achieve ileal reflux in 26% of patients and had a 23% false negative rate when reflux was achieved. Because small-bowel series as done by conventional methods was significantly less accurate, we believe small-bowel enema should be considered in patients with suspected small-bowel disease when other studies are negative.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sellink JL: Radiologic examination of the small intestine by duodenal intubation. Acta Radiol 15:318–332, 1974
Pesquera GS: A method for the direct visualization of lesions in the small intestines. Am J Roentgenol 22:254–257, 1929
Bilbao MK, Frische LH, Dotter CT, Rosch J: Hypotonic duodenography. Radiology 89:438–443, 1967
Sanders DE, Ho CS: The small bowel enema: Experience with 150 examinations. Am J Roentgenol 127:743–751, 1976
Vallance R: An evaluation of the small bowel enema based on an analysis of 350 consecutive examinations. Clin Radiol 31:227–232, 1980
Schatzki R: Small intestinal enema. Am J Roentgenol 50:743–751, 1943
Elmore MF, Maglinte DD: Enteroclysis in the diagnosis of small intestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology 80: 1142, 1981 (abstract)
Schlaeger R: Examination of the small bowel (Chapter 31).In Alimentary Tract Roentgenology. A Margulis, H Burbenne (eds). CV Mosby, 1973, pp. 807–808
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gurian, L., Jendrzejewski, J., Katon, R. et al. Small-bowel enema. Digest Dis Sci 27, 1101–1108 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01391448
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01391448