Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The legal history of work-related sexual harassment and implications for employers

  • Comment
  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the years, the courts have come to consider sexual harassment as a kind of sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Employers are held liable for sexual harassment, and have an affirmative action obligation to eliminate sexual harassment from the workplace. The courts and the EEOC Guidelines have defined sexual harassment as tangible employment consequences or behavior that creates a hostile or offensive working environment. Employers can limit their liability by creating a system to detect sexual harassment and to remedy it promptly. Suggestions to wards developing a strong policy to eliminate sexual harassment from the workplace are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barlow v. Northwestern Memorial Hospital, 30 FEP Cases223 (N.D. Ill. 1980).

  • Barrett v. Omaha National Bank, 35 FEP Cases 593 (8th Circ. 1984).

  • Black's Law Dictionary (1979). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.

  • Brown v. City of Guthrie, 22 FEP Cases 1627 (W.D. Okla. 1980).

  • Bundy v. Jackson, 24 FEP Cases 1155 (D.C. Cir. 1979).

  • Bureau of National Affairs (1981):Sexual Harassment and Labor Relations: A BNA Special Report. Washington, DC: BNA, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of National Affairs (1982).Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Compliance Manual. Washington, DC: BNA, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of National Affairs (1984).Fair Employment Practice Manual: BNA Labor Relations Reporter. Washington, DC: BNA, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calcote v. Texas Educational Foundation, 578 F. 2d 95 (5th Cir. 1978).

  • Carroll v. Tolman Federal Savings & Loan of Chicago, 604 F. 2d 1028 (7th Cir. 1979).

  • Clark v. World Airways, 24 FEP Cases 305 (D.C. District 1980).

  • Coles, F. S. (1986). Forced to quit: Sexual harassment complaints and agency response.Sex Roles, 14(1–2), 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coley v. Conrail, 34 FEP Cases 129 (E.D. Mich. 1982).

  • Craig v. Y & Y Snacks, Inc., 33 FEP Cases 187 (3rd Cir. 1983).

  • Crull, P. (1982). Stress effects of sexual harassment on the job: Implications for counseling.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52, 539–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Fair Employment v. Ambylou Enterprises, Inc. (1982). Case No. FEP 80-81, FEHC Decision No. 82-06.

  • Dolecheck, C. C., & Dolecheck, M. M. (1983). Sexual harassment: A problem for small businesses.American Journal of Small Business, 8(3), 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfack, M. (1982). Sexual harassment: Can you afford not to clamp down?Supervision, 44, 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durant v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co., 31 FEP Cases 215 (E.D. Louisiana 1980).

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission guidelines on sexual harassment, (1980), 29 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1604.

  • Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act, Act No. 453, Public Acts of 1976, Sec. 801–803 (1982).

  • EEOC v. Sage Realty Corp., 24 FEP Cases 1521 (S.D. New York, 1980).

  • Faley, R. E. (1982). Sexual harassment: A critical review of legal cases with general principles and preventative measures.Personnel Psychology, 35, 583–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber v. Saxon Business Products, 15 FEP Cases 344 (4th Cir. 1977).

  • Garvey, M. S. (1986). The high cost of sexual harassment suits.Personnel Journal, 65(1), 75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer v. University of Arkansas Board of Trustees, 33 FEP Cases 77 (E.D. Arkansas 1982).

  • Heelan v. Johns-Manville, 20 FEP Cases 251 (Colo. Dist. 1978).

  • Hoyman, M., & Robinson, R. (1980). Interpreting the new sexual harassment guidelines.Personnel Journal, 59, 966–1000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbart, W. S. (1980). Sexual harassment: Coping with the controversy.Administrative Management, 41, 34–35, 74–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, J. (1981). Sexual harassment.Public Personnel Management Journal, 10, 402–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyner v. AAA Cooper Transportation, 36 FEP Cases 1644 (M.D. Alabama 1983).

  • Katz v. Dole, 31 FEP Cases 1521 (4th Cir. 1983).

  • King v. Palmer, 39 FEP Cases 877 (D.C. Circuit Appeals 1985).

  • Kronenberger, G. K., & Bourke, D. L. (1981). Effective training and the elimination of sexual harassment.Personnel Journal, 60(11), 879–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriazi v. Western Electric Co. 18 FEP Cases 924 (N.J. Dist. 1978).

  • Lamb. v. Drilco Division, 32 FEP Cases 105 (S.D. Texas 1983).

  • Levin-Epstein, M. D. (1984).Primer of Equal Employment Opportunity (3rd ed.), Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Licata, B. J., & Popovich, P. M. (1987). Preventing sexual harassment: A proactive approach.Training and Development Journal, 41(5), 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, J. (1982). Responses to sexual harassment on the job: Legal, organizational and individual actions.Journal of Social Issues, 38(4), 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manley, M. (1987). Dealing with sexual harassment.Inc., 9(5), 145–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin v. Norbar, Inc., 30 FEP Cases 103 (S.D. Ohio 1982).

  • Mastalli, G. L. (1981). Appendix: The legal context.Harvard Business Review, 59, 94–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 447 U.S. 57, 40 FEP Cases 1822 (1986).

  • Meyers v. I.T.T. Diversified Credit Corp., 27 FEP Cases 995 (E.D. Missouri 1981).

  • Miller v. Bank of America, 20 FEP Cases 462 (9th Cir. 1979).

  • Oakland University Board of Trustees (1987). Sexual harassment policy statement and complaint procedures. (Available from Catherine J. Rush, Director, Office of Equal Opportunity, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, 48309-4401).

  • Petersen, D., & Massengill, D. (1982). Sexual harassment—A growing problem in the workplace.Personnel Administrator, 27, 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips v. Smalley Maintenance Services, 32 FEP Cases 975 (11th Cir. 1983).

  • Player, M. A. (1981).Federal Law of Employment Discrimination in a Nutshell. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimedio v. Revlon, Inc., 30 FEP Cases 1205 (S.D. Ohio 1982).

  • Rogers v. Loew's L'Enfant Plaza Hotel, 526 F. Supp. 523 (D.C. Dist. 1981).

  • Rowe, M. P. (1981). Dealing with sexual harassment.Harvard Business Review, 59(3), 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seritis v. Lane, 30 FEP Cases 423 (S.Ct. Calif. 1980).

  • Sullivan, C. A., Zimmer, M. J., & Richards, R. (1980).Federal Statutory Law of Employment Discrimination. 161–163. New York: Michie Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins v. Public Service Electric & Gas, 16 FEP Cases 22 (3rd Circuit Appeal, 1977).

  • U.S. Department of Labor (1984).A Working Woman's Guide to Her Job Rights, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (1981).Sexual Harassment in the Federal Workplace: Is It a Problem? Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waks, J. W., & Starr, M. G. (1982a): Sexual harassment in the workplace: The scope of employer liability:Employee Relations Law Journal, 7(3), 369–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waks, J. W., & Starr, M. G. (1982b). The “sexual shakedown” in perspective: Sexual harassment in its social and legal contexts.Employee Relations Law Journal, 7(4), 567–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, S. L. (1984). Sexual harassment: Court costs rise for a persistent problem.Management Review, 73(12), 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesman, E. C. (1983). Shortage of research abets sexual harassment confusion.Personnel Administrator, 28(11), 60–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams v. Saxbe, 12 FEP Cases 1093 (D.C. Dist. 1976).

  • Williams v. Sunoco Products, 33 FEP Cases 1200 (S. Carolina Dist. 1982).

  • Wymer, J. F., III (1983). Compensatory and punitive damages for sexual harassment.Personnel Journal, 62(3), 181–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young v. Southwestern Savings & Loan Association, 509 F. 2d 140 (5th Cir. 1975).

  • Zabkowicz v. West Bend Co., 35 FEP Cases 610 (E.D. Wise. 1984).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business Administration, Oakland University, 48309-4401, Rochester, Michigan

    Kenneth M. York

  2. Personnel Designs, Inc., 48236, Grosse Pointe, Michigan

    Kelly J. Brookhouse

Authors
  1. Kenneth M. York
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kelly J. Brookhouse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

York, K.M., Brookhouse, K.J. The legal history of work-related sexual harassment and implications for employers. Employ Respons Rights J 1, 227–237 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384983

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384983

Key Words

Search

Navigation