Higher Education

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 429–447 | Cite as

Enhancing organizational effectiveness: The importance of culture type and mission agreement

  • Nancy Fjortoft
  • John C. Smart
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the independent and conditional effects of organizational culture type and level of mission agreement on the organizational effectiveness of four-year colleges and universities. While significant differences are found for both culture type and mission agreement, there are important conditional effects on two of the effectiveness measures. The implications of these findings for efforts to enhance the effectiveness of colleges and universities are discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Association of American Colleges (1985).Integrity in the College Curriculum. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Birnbaum, Robert (1988). ‘Consistency and diversity in the goals of campus leaders’,The Review of Higher Education 12, 17–30.Google Scholar
  3. Bourgeois, L.J. III (1985). ‘Strategic goals, perceived uncertainty, and economic performance in volatile environments’,Academy of Management Journal 28, 548–573.Google Scholar
  4. Cameron, B.J. (1989).Effectiveness and Efficiency of Higher Education Institutions in Queensland. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  5. Cameron, Kim S. (1978). ‘Measuring organization effectiveness in institutions of higher education’,Administrative Science Quarterly 23, 604–632.Google Scholar
  6. Cameron, Kim S. (1986). ‘A study of organizational effectiveness and its predictors’,Management Science 32, 87–111.Google Scholar
  7. Cameron, Kim S. and Ulrich, David O. (1986). ‘Transformational leadership in colleges and universities’, in Smart, J.C. (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 2. New York: Agathon Press, pp. 1–42.Google Scholar
  8. Cameron, Kim S. and Ettington, Deborah R. (1988). ‘Conceptual foundations of organizational culture’, in Smart, J.C. (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 4. New York: Agathon Press, pp. 356–396.Google Scholar
  9. Cameron, Kim S. and Tischirhart, Mary (1992). ‘Postindustrial environments and organizational effectiveness in colleges and universities’,Journal of Higher Education 63, 87–108.Google Scholar
  10. Cameron, Kim S. and Freeman, Sarah J. (1991). ‘Cultural congruence, strength, and type: relationships to effectiveness’,Research in Organizational Change and Development 5, 23–58.Google Scholar
  11. Chaffee, Ellen E. (1984). ‘Successful strategic management in small private colleges’,Journal of Higher Education 55, 212–241.Google Scholar
  12. Chaffee, Ellen E. (1985). ‘The concept of strategy: From business to higher education’, in Smart, J.C. (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 1. New York: Agathon Press, pp. 133–172.Google Scholar
  13. Chaffee, Ellen E. and Tierney, William G. (1988).Collegiate Culture and Leadership Strategies. New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  14. Chait, Richard (1979). ‘Mission madness strikes our colleges’,The Chronicle of Higher Education 18 (36), 36.Google Scholar
  15. Clark, Burton R. (1971). ‘The organizational saga in higher education’,Administrative Science Quarterly 17, 178–184.Google Scholar
  16. Davies, Gordon K. (1986). ‘The importance of being general: philosophy, politics and institutional mission statements’, in Smart, J.C. (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research Vol. 2. New York: Agathon Press, pp. 85–108.Google Scholar
  17. Deal, Terrence E., and Kennedy, A.A. (1982).Corporate Cultures: The Rights and Rituals of Corporate Life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  18. Denison, Daniel R. (1990).Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  19. Dill, David D. (1982). ‘The management of academic culture: Notes on the management of meaning and social integration’,Higher Education 11, 303–320.Google Scholar
  20. Dill, David D. (1992). ‘Quality by design: toward a framework for academic quality management’, in Smart, J.C. (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research Vol. 8. New York: Agathon Press, pp. 37–83.Google Scholar
  21. Dill, David D. and Helm, K.P. (1988). ‘Faculty participation in strategic policy making’, in Smart, J.C. (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research Vol. 4. New York: Agathon Press, pp. 319–355.Google Scholar
  22. Drucker, Peter (1973).Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Ppractices. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  23. Ewell, Peter T. (1989). ‘Institutional characteristics and faculty/administrator perceptions of outcomes: An exploratory analysis’,Research in Higher Education 30, 113–136.Google Scholar
  24. Giglioti, L.I. (1987).An Adaptation of Cameron's Model of Organizational Effectiveness at the Academic Department Level in Two-year Community Colleges. Ph.D. dissertation, Syracuse University.Google Scholar
  25. Gourman, Jack. (1983).The Government Report: A Rating of Undergraduate Programs in American and International Universities. Los Angeles: National Educational Standards.Google Scholar
  26. Gumport, Patricia J. (1988). ‘Curricula as signposts of cultural change’,The Review of Higher Education 12, 49–61.Google Scholar
  27. Hardy, Cynthia (1990). ‘Putting power into university governance’, in Smart, J.C. (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research Vol. 6. New York: Agathon Press, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
  28. Hartnett, Rodney T. and Centra, John A. (1974). ‘Faculty views of the academic environment: Situational vs. institutional perspectives’,Sociology of Education 47, 159–169.Google Scholar
  29. Jung, C.G. (1923).Psychological Types. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  30. Kleeman, G.L. (1984).Student Perceptions of Effectiveness at Three State Universities. Ph.D. dissertation, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
  31. Krakower, Jack Y. and Niwa, Shelley (1985).An Assessment of the Validity and Reliability of the Institutional Performance Survey. Boulder, CO: NCHEMS.Google Scholar
  32. Kuh, George D. and Whitt, Elizabeth J. (1988).The Invisible Tapestry: Culture in American Colleges and Universities. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.Google Scholar
  33. Lang, Daniel W. and Lopers-Sweetman, Rosanne (1991). ‘The role of statements of institutional purpose’,Research in Higher Education 32, 599–624.Google Scholar
  34. Lundberg, Craig C. (1985). ‘On the feasibility of cultural intervention in organizations’, in Frost, P.J. et al. (eds.),Organizational Culture. Beverly Hills, Sage, pp. 169–185.Google Scholar
  35. Masland, Andrew T. (1985). ‘Organizational culture in the study of higher education’,The Review of Higher Education 8, 157–168.Google Scholar
  36. Massy, William F. (1990). ‘A paradigm for research in higher education’, in Smart, J.C. (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research Vol. 6. New York: Agathon Press, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
  37. Massy, William F. and Wilger, Andrea K. (1992). ‘Productivity in postsecondary education: A new approach’,Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 14, 361–376.Google Scholar
  38. Moran, E. Thomas and Volkwein, J. Fredricks (1988). ‘Examining organizational climate in institutions of higher education’,Research in Higher Education 28, 367–384.Google Scholar
  39. National Endowment for the Humanities (1984).To Reclaim a Legacy. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  40. National Institute of Education (1984).Involvement in Learning. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  41. Ouchi, William G. (1980). ‘Markets, bureaucracies, and clans’,Administrative Science Quarterly 25, 833–848.Google Scholar
  42. Ouchi, William G. (1981).Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  43. Ouchi, William G. and Wilkins, Alan L. (1985). ‘Organizational culture’,Annual Review of Sociology 11, 457–483.Google Scholar
  44. Peck, R.D. (1984). ‘Entrepreneurship as a significant factor in successful adaptation’,Journal of Higher Education 55, 269–285.Google Scholar
  45. Pennings, J.M. and Goodman, P.S. (1977). ‘Toward a workable framework’, in Goodman, P.S. and Pennings, J.M. (eds.),New Perspectives on Organizational Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 146–184.Google Scholar
  46. Perrow, C. (1970).Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  47. Peters, T.J. and Waterman, R.H. (1982).In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-run Companies. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  48. Peterson, Marvin W. and White, Theodore H. (1992). ‘Faculty and administrator perceptions of their environments’,Research in Higher Education 33, 177–204.Google Scholar
  49. Price, J.L. (1972). ‘The study of organizational effectiveness’,Sociological Quarterly 13, 3–15.Google Scholar
  50. Quinn, Robert E. (1988).Beyond Rational Management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  51. Rush, P.D. (1988).Community College Organizational Effectiveness Through Trustee and Presidential Perceptions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  52. Schein, Edgar H. (1990).Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  53. Schein, Edgar H. (1992).Organizational Culture and Leadership, Second-Edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  54. Smart, John C. (1975). ‘Institutional goal congruence: A study of student, faculty, and administrator preferences’,Research in Higher Education 3, 285–297.Google Scholar
  55. Smart, John C. (1989). ‘Organizational decline and effectiveness in private higher education’,Research in Higher Education 30, 387–401.Google Scholar
  56. Smart, John C. and Hamm, Russell E. (1993a). ‘Organizational culture and effectiveness in two-year colleges’,Research in Higher Education 34, 95–106.Google Scholar
  57. Smart, John C. and Hamm, Russell E. (1993b). ‘Organizational effectiveness and mission orientations of two-year colleges’,Research in Higher Education 34, 489–502.Google Scholar
  58. Smart, John C. and Lerner, Allan W. (1993). ‘Organizational culture and effectiveness in higher education: A test of the “culture type” and “strong culture” hypotheses’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, April, 1993.Google Scholar
  59. Stevens, James. (1992).Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences, Second Edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  60. Thelin, John R. (1986). ‘Postscript to “The importance of being general” by Gordon K. Davis. The campus as chameleon: Rethinking organizational behavior and public policy’, in Smart, J.C. (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research Vol. 2. New York: Agathon Press, pp. 103–108.Google Scholar
  61. Tierney, William G. (1988). ‘Organizational culture in higher education’,Journal of Higher Education 59, 1–21.Google Scholar
  62. Tuckman, Howard P. and Chang Cyril F. (1988). ‘Conflict, congruence, and generic university goals’,Journal of Higher Education 59, 611–633.Google Scholar
  63. Wilkins, Alan L. and Ouchi, William G. (1983). ‘Efficient cultures: Exploring the relationship between culture and organizational performance’,Administrative Science Quarterly 28, 468–481.Google Scholar
  64. Winer, B.J. (1971).Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  65. Yuchtman, E. and Seashore, S.E. (1967). ‘A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness’,American Sociological Review 32, 891–903.Google Scholar
  66. Zammuto, Raymond F. and Krakower, Jack Y. (1991). ‘Quantitative and qualitative studies of organizational culture’,Research in Organizational Change and Development 5, 83–114.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy Fjortoft
    • 1
  • John C. Smart
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Pharmacy (M/C 874)University of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of LeadershipMemphis State UniversityMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations