Skip to main content
Log in

Tax and spend or spend and tax? An empirical investigation for Austria

  • Published:
Empirica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this contribution is to discriminate between the rivallingspend and tax andtax and spend hypotheses in order to check empirically the relationship between government spending and taxation decisions in Austria. For that purpose, the authors estimate a tri-variate structural VAR Model of Austria's public sector that, besides expenditures and revenues, includes aggregate income as an additional variable. They implement impulse-response functions and frequency domain techniques in order to identify the causal relation between government outlays and receipts. The budget making process is interpreted as an error correction model which allows to estimate to what extent revenues and expenditures are adjusted whenever the government sees its long run budget constraint violate. The empirical findings strongly support the spend and tax view that budget decision-making is significantly dominated by the expenditure side in Austria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, W., Wallace, M.S. and Warner, J.T. (1986) ‘Government Spending and Taxation: What Causes What?’,Southern Economic Journal 53, 630–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. (1979) ‘On the Determination of the Public Debt’,Journal of Political Economy 87, 940–971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B. (1986) ‘Alternative Explanations of the Money-Income Correlation’,Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 25, 1986, 49–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O.J. and Quah, D. (1989) ‘The Dynamic Effects of Aggregate Demand and Supply Disturbances’,The American Economic Review 79, 655–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMdF (1985)Aufgaben und Ziele einer neuen Finanzpolitik—Grenzen staatlicher Verschuldung, Bonn.

  • Bohn, H. (1991) ‘Budget Balance through Revenue or Spending Adjustments? Some Historical Evidence for the United States’,Journal of Monetary Economics 27, 333–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bös, D., Genser, B. and Holzmann, R. (1983) ‘Die Entwicklung des Finanzausgleichs in ausgewählten Bundesstaaten: Österreich’,Handbuch der Finanzwissenschaft, 3. Aufl., Tübingen: 123–162.

  • Buchanan, J.M. and Wagner, R.E. (1977)Democracy in Deficit, New York.

  • Buiter, W.H. (1983) ‘Measurement of the Public Sector Deficit and its Implication for Policy Evaluation and Design’,IMF Staff Papers 30, 306–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesregierung (1987)Sanieren und Erneuern—Das Arbeitsprogramm der Bundesregierung, Wien.

  • Bundesregierung (1987)Durch Reformschwung Österreichs Chancen nutzen — Das Arbeitsübereinkommen der Bundesregierung, Wien.

  • Campell, J.Y. and Perron, P. (1994) ‘A Note on Johansen's Cointegration Procedure when Trends are Present’, in Dufour J.-M. and Baldev, R. (eds.),New Developments in Time Series Econometrics, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 221–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chouraqui, J.C. et al. (1986) ‘Public Debt in a Medium Term Perspective’,OECD—Economic Studies 7, 103–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Grauwe, P. (1989) ‘Disinflation in the EMS and in the Non-EMS Countries: What have we learned?’,Empirica 16, 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditz, J. (1992) ‘Neuorientierung in der Budgetpolitik’,Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter 39, 176–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Report of the President (1984) Washington D.C.

  • Economic Report of the President (1985) Washington D.C.

  • Geweke, J. (1982) ‘The Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback between Multiple Time Series’,Journal of American Statistical Association 77, 304–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geweke, J. (1984) ‘Measure of Conditional Linear Dependence and Feedback between Time Series’,Journal of American Statistical Association 79, 907–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geweke, J. (1986) ‘The Superneutrality of Money in the United States: An Interpretation of the Evidence’,Econometrica 54, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C.W.J. (1969) ‘Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods’,Econometrica 73.3.

  • Heller, W.W. (1967)New Dimensions of Political Economy, New York.

  • HMSO (1986) ‘Financial Statement and Budget Report’,Her Majesties Stationery Office, London.

  • Johansen, S. (1988) ‘Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors’,Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12, 231–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotlikoff, L.J. (1984) ‘Economic Impact of Deficit Financing’,IMF—Staff Papers 31, 594–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manage, N. and Marlow, M.L. (1986) ‘The Causal Relation between Federal Expenditures and Receipts’,Southern Economic Journal 53, 617–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, M.J. and Visser Sounders, J.C. (1986) ‘Marginal Tax Rates on the Use of Labour and Capital in OECD-Countries’,OECD Economic Studies 7, 46–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. and Russek, F. (1990) ‘Co-integration and Error-Correction Models: The Temporal Causality between Govermment Taxes and Spending’,Southern Economic Journal 57, 221–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R.A. (1985) ‘A Brief History of Fiscal Doctrine’, in Auerbach, A.J. and Feldstein, M. (eds.),Handbook of Public Economics. Amsterdam, 1–59.

  • OECD (1981)Economic Survey United Kingdom, Paris.

  • Peacock, A.T. and Wiseman, J. (1979) ‘Approaches to the Analysis of Govenment Expenditure Growth’,Public Finance Quarterly 7, 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, P.A. (1982) ‘Comment on Geweke 1982’,Journal of American Statistical Association 77, 315–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • PSK (1991)Bericht der Österreichischen Postsparkasse über die Finanzschuld des Bundes, Wien.

  • Ram, R. (1988) ‘Additional Evidence on Causality between Government Revenues and Government Receipts’,Southern Economic Journal 53, 763–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachverständigenrat (1985)Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, Bonn.

  • Seidel, H. (1989) ‘Budgetkonsolidierung als Daueraufgabe’Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter 36, 368–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, A.Ch. (1986) ‘Are Forecasting Models Usable for Policy Analysis’,Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, Winter, 2–16.

  • Smith, A. (1776)An Inquiry into the Nature and Course of the Wealth of Nations.

  • Stiassny, A. (1994) ‘A Note on Frequency Domain Properties of Estimated VARs’,Working Paper No., 27Department of Economics, Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration.

  • Streissler, E. (1989) ‘The International Consequences of Less Progressive Taxation’, in Bös, D. and Felderer, B. (eds.),The Political Economy of Progressive Taxation. Berrlin, 43–70.

  • von Furstenberg, G.M., Green, R.J. and Jeong, Jin-Ho. (1986) ‘Tax and Spend or Spend and Tax?’,The Review of Economics and Statitics 68, 179–188.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We are gratefully indebted to Peter Weiss and three anonymous referees for many valuable comments and suggestion.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koren, S., Stiassny, A. Tax and spend or spend and tax? An empirical investigation for Austria. Empirica 22, 127–149 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384650

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384650

Key words

JEL Codes

Navigation