Abstract
Between 1986 and 1993, tertiary education institutions, [TEIs] in New Zealand have transformed their annual reports from being uninformative, untimely and unobtainable documents, to ones that are well-presented, comprehensive and readily available in a timely fashion (Coy, Tower & Dixon, 1994). This paper reports a study of the events and experiences according to report preparers in bringing about this change, including the incentives and difficulties that they have been facing.
The study uses data collected from 48 staff involved in report preparation at 15 of the 37 TEIs that are in New Zealand. These data are qualitative, and are analysed from a realist perspective mixing causal analysis and interpretive understanding (Silverman 1985).
The study suggests that the mandated changes to reporting are seen as one facet of several recent public sector reforms in New Zealand. Interviewees felt that the changes to reporting were driven externally by legislation, and internally by the stances taken by some chief executive officers and by the professional ardour of some accountants. Moreover, the Audit Office was seen as a prominent agent of change.
The general reactions of preparers of reports to the reforms range from strong support to resentment and scepticism. A major concern voiced was the potential for data reported by TEIs to be used for political purposes. On the other hand, improved staff motivation was noted in many institutions as well as greater cost consciousness and awareness of student, needs. However, these positive attributes were probably derived from the reforms in general, and not just from the changes to reporting.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ansari, S., & Euske, K. J. (1987). Rational, rationalizing, and reifying uses of accounting data in organizations,Accounting, Organizations and Society,12(6), 549–570.
Boston, J., Martin, J., Pallot, J., & Walsh, P. (Eds.), (1991).Reshaping the state: New Zealand's bureaucratic revolution. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
Bryman, A. (1988).Quantity and quality in social research. London: Unwin Hyman.
Chua, W. F. (1988). Interpretive sociology and management accounting research: A critical review.Accounting, Auditing and Accountability,1(2), 59–79.
Coopers & Lybrand (1985).National Data Study for the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals Steering Committee for Efficiency Studies in Universities. London: Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals.
Coy, D., Tower, G.D., & Dixon, K. (1993, November). Quantifying the Quality of Tertiary Education Annual Reports,Accounting and Finance,33(2), 121–131.
Coy, D., Tower, G., & Dixon, K. (1994, June). Public Sector Reform in New Zealand: The Progress of Tertiary Education Annual Reports 1990–92,Financial Accountability and Management,10(3), 253–261.
Denzin, N. K. (1989).The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Dixon, K., Coy, D., & Tower, G.D. (1991, Autumn). External Reporting by New Zealand Universities 1985–1989: Improving Accountability,Financial Accountability and Management,7(3), 159–178.
Educatin Act. No. 80 of 1989.
Glynn, J. J. (1987).Public sector financial control and accounting. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Hay, D. (1991). The revolution: Changes to financial reporting for central government departments.Accountants' Journal,61(3) 31–34.
Hay, D. (1992). Public sector accounting in New Zealand An update and clarification.Financial Accountability and Management,8, 1–6.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984).Quanlitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
Ministry of Education. (1991a).The EFTS (equivalent full time student) funding system for tertiary institutions. Wellington: Author.
Ministry of Education. (1991b).Financial reporting for tertiary institutions. Wellington: Author.
Mintzberg, H. (1989).Mintzberg on management: Inside our strange world of organizations. New York NY: Free.
New Zealand Society of Accountants (1987).Statement of public sector accounting concepts, (SPSAC). Wellington: Author.
Patton, M. Q. (1990).Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Pendlebury, M., & Jones, R. (1985). Governmental budgeting as ex ante financial accounting: The United Kingdom case.Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 4, 301–316.
Public Finance Act. No. 44 of 1989.
Rutherford, B. A. (1983).Financial reporting in the public sector. London: Butterworths.
Scott, G., & Gorringe, P. (1989). Reform of the core public sector: The New Zealand experience.Australian Journal of Public Administration,48(1), 81–92.
Silverman, D. (1985).Qualitative methodology and sociology. Aldershot, Hants: Gower.
State Sector Amendment Act (No. 2). No. 136 of 1989.
Taylor, P., & Turley, S. (1986).The regulation of accounting. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Treasury. (1990).Putting it simply: An explanatory guide to financial management reform. Wellington: Government Printing Office.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dixon, K., Coy, D. & Tower, G. Perceptions and experiences of annual report preparers. High Educ 29, 287–306 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384495
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384495