Skip to main content
Log in

Drama theory and its relation to game theory. Part 1: Dramatic resolution vs. Rational solution

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drama theory differs from game theory in that it does not regard actors' preferences and perceived opportunities as fixed, but as capable of being changed by the actors themselves under the pressure of pre-play negotiations. Thus characters in a drama undergo change and development. A manyperson, multiphase theory of dramatic transformation is presented, showing how thecore of a drama (in the sense of game theory) is transformed by the interaction between the characters into a strict, strong equilibrium to which they all aspire. The process of dramatic transformation is shown to be driven by actors' reactions to various “paradoxes of rationality”; it is proved that when all these paradoxes have been overcome, a full dramatic resolution has been reached, satisfying actors' emotional and moral demands, as well as the demands of rationality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aumann, R.J. (1959). “Acceptable Points in General Cooperativen-Person Games.” In A.W. Tucker and R.D. Luce (eds.),Annals of Mathematics Studies No. 4, Princeton, NJ, pp. 287–324.

  • Bennett, P.G. (1980). “Hypergames: Developing a Model of Conflict,”Futures 12, 489–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, N. (1978) “Categories of Games,” unpublished.

  • Howard, N. (1990). “‘Soft’ Game Theory,”Information and Decision Technologies 16, 215–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, N. et al. (1992). “Manifesto for a Theory of Drama and Irrational Choice,”Journal of the Operational Research Society.

  • Howard, N. (1992). “A Paradigm Shift,”Cooperation and Conflict 6(1), 1–2 (formerly theCONAN Newsletter, published by Nigel Howard Systems, 10 Bloomfield Rd., Birmingham, B13 9 BY, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, N. (1971).Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J.F. (1953). “Two-Person Cooperative Games,”Econometrica 21, 128–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirandello, L. (1924).Six Characters in Search of an Author. Translated by E. Storer in Eric Bentley (ed.),Naked Masks, Five Plays by Luigi Pirandello (1952). New York.

  • von Neumann, J. (1939). “On the Theory of Games of Strategy.” Translated and reprinted in A. W. Tucker and R.D. Luce (eds.),Annals of Mathematics Studies No. 4, Princeton, NJ (1959), pp. 13–42.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Howard, N. Drama theory and its relation to game theory. Part 1: Dramatic resolution vs. Rational solution. Group Decis Negot 3, 187–206 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384354

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384354

Key words

Navigation