Skip to main content
Log in

Using fixed-point semantics to prove retiming lemmas

  • Published:
Formal Methods in System Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Algorithms designed for VLSI implementation are commonly described by directed graphs, in which the nodes represent functional units and the arcs indicate communication links. We give a denotational semantics for such a graph in terms of the least fixed point of a set of (mutually recursive) function definitions, describing the outputs produced at each node as a function of time. This semantics is consistent with the conventional clocked operational semantics of the system. A retiming is a systematic modification of the internode delays of a design, often used to convert an algorithm design into a systolic form. The utility of such retimings in optimizing the behavior of designs is well known. We use fixed-point semantics to provide simple proofs of the correctness of certain retiming transformations from the literature and to justify other design transformations such as pipelining.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Charles E. Leiserson and James B. Saxe. Optimizing synchronous systems.Journal of VLSI and Computer Systems, 1(1): 41–68 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. H.T. Kung and W.T. Lin. An algebra for VLSI computation. InElliptic Problem Solvers II, G. Birkhoff and A.L. Schoenstadt (eds.). Academic Press, New York, January 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.C. Chen.Space-time Algorithms: Semantics and Methodology. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, California Institute of Technology, May 1983.

  4. M.C. Chen and C.A. Mead. A hierarchical simulator based on formal semantics. InProceedings of the Third Caltech Conference on Very Large Scale Integration, R. Bryant (ed.). Computer Science Press, Rockville, Maryland, March 1983, papes 207–223.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.J.C. Gordon. A model of register transfer systems with applications to microcode and VLSI correctness. Department of Computer Science Technical Report CSR-82-81, University of Edinburgh, 1981.

  6. J.E. Stoy.Denotational Semantics: The Scott-Strachey Approach to Programming Language Semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.S. Scott and C. Strachey. Toward a mathematical semantics for computer languages. InProceedings of the Symposium on Computers and Automata, J. Box (ed.). Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn Press, New York, 1971, pp. 19–46.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H.T. Kung and M. Lam. Fault-tolerance and two-level pipelining in VLSI systolic arrays. InProceedings of the Conference on Advanced Research in VLSI, MIT, Cambridge, MA, January 1984.

  9. J.W. de Bakker and D.S. Scott. A theory of programs.Seminar on Programming Theory, Vienna, 1969.

  10. G. Kahn and D.B. MacQueen. Coroutines and networks of parallel processes. InInformation Processing 1977. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1977, pp. 993–998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Lam and J. Mostow. A transformational model of VLSI systolic design. InProceedings of the 6 th International Symposium on Computer Hardware Description Languages and their Applications, T. Uehara and M. Barbacci (eds.). IFIP, Pittsburgh, PA, May 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stephen N. Cole. Real-time computation byn-dimensional iterative arrays of finite-state machines.IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-18:349–365 (April 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  13. H.T. Kung and Charles E. Leiserson. Systolic arrays (for VLSI). InSparse Matrix Proceedings 1978, I.S. Duff and G.W. Stewart (eds.). Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1978, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 256–282.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brookes, S. Using fixed-point semantics to prove retiming lemmas. Form Method Syst Des 2, 73–91 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383944

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383944

Keywords

Navigation