Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of staff and student tutors on student achievement

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the problem-based curriculum of the faculty of Law, students of the first year are guided by staff tutors or undergraduate student tutors in small tutorial groups. In this study, academic achievement of staff tutor-guided groups are compared with student tutor-guided groups. After an eight-week course students' level of academic achievement was tested by essay questions. Two methods of assessing students' performance are used: expert judgements and propositional analysis. Results of both methods used indicate that no differences in academic achievement occur. Students guided by student tutors perform as well as students guided by staff tutors. Several explanations are proposed to account for these results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, V.L. (1976).Children as teachers. Theory and research on tutoring. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, H.S. (1988).The tutorial process. Springfield (III.): Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, L.R. (1974). “Self-directed student groups and college learning”,Higher Education 3, 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, L.R. (1983). ‘A report from America’, in Collier, K.G. (ed.),The management of peer group learning. Syndicate methods in Higher Education. (pp. 48–55) Guilford: Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, W. (1983). ‘Studenten de mond gesnoerd door autoriteit?’ (Students shut up by teachers' authority?),Bulletin Medisch Onderwijs, 2, 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloxom, B., Caul, W.F., Fristoe, M. and Thomson, W.J. (1975. ‘On the use of student-led discussion groups’,The Educational Forum, 39, 223–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blunt, M.J. and Blizzard, P.J. (1973). ‘Development and initial assessment of a teaching-learning programme in anatomy’,British Journal of Medical Education, 7, 244–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromage, B.K. and R.E. Mayer (1981). ‘Relationship between what is remembered and creative problem-solving performance in science learning’,Journal of Education Psychology, 73, 451–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carsrud, A.L. (1979). ‘Undergraduate tutors: Are they useful?’,Teaching of Psychology, 6, 46–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cate, Th.J. ten (1986).Leren in groepen zonder docent. (Learning in groups without a teacher). PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.

  • Clement, D.E. (1971). ‘Learning and retention in student-led discussion groups’,The Journal of Social Psychology, 84, 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffman, W.E. (1971). ‘Essay Examinations’, in: Thorndike, R.L. (ed.),Educational Measurement. Washington D.C.: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, K.G. (1969). “Syndicate methods: Further evidence and comment’,Universities Quarterly, 23, 431–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J., Gleser, G.C., Nanda, H., and Rajaratnam, N. (1972).The dependability of behavioral measurements. Theory of generalizability of scores and profiles. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W. and Phelps, E. (1989). ‘Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education’,International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gijseleaers, W.H., Bouhuijs, P., Mulder, M. and Mullink, J. (1987).Rapport: Experiment student-tutoren blok 1.5 en blok 1.6. (Report: Experiment with student tutors in unit 1.5 and 1.6) FdEw-OC 87-237. Maastrict, The Netherlands: University of Limburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grave, W.S. de, Volder, M.L. de, Gijselaers, W.H. and Damoiseaux, V. (1990). “Peer teaching and problem-based learning: Tutor characteristics, tutor functioning, group functioning and student-achievement”, in Nooman Z.N., Schmidt, H.G. and Ezzat, E.S. (eds.),Innovation in medical education. An evaluation of its present status. New York: Spring Publ. Co, pp. 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruppen, L.D., Traber, P., Paine, M.E., Woolliscroft, J.O. and Davis, W.K. (1992). ‘Tutor-led and student-led small groups: No differences in learning?’, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

  • Hovey, D.E., Gruber, H.E., & Terrell, G. (1963). ‘Effects of self-directed study on course achievement, retention, and curiosity’,The Journal of Educational Research, 56, 345–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.E. (1985). ‘Structural analysis of science prose: Can we increase problem-solving performance?’, in Britton B.K. and Black, J.B. (eds.),Understanding expository text. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B.J.F. (1975),The organization of prose and its effect on memory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moust, J.H.C. (1993).De rol van tutoren in probleemgestuurd onderwijs. Contrasten tussen student-en docenttutoren. (On the role of tutors in problem-based learning: Contrasting student-guided with staff-guided tutorials.) PhD thesis. Datawyse/University Press. Maastricht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moust, J.H.C. and Schmidt, H.G. (in press) ‘Facilitating small-group learning. A comparison of student and staff tutors' behavior’,International Journal of Educational Research.

  • Rudduck, J. (1978)Learning through small group discussion. A study of seminar work in higher education Guilford: Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H.G. (1982).Activatie van voorkennis intrinsieke motivatie en de verwerking van tekst. Studies in probleemgestuurd onderwijs. (Activation of prior knowledge, intrinsic motivation and text processing. Studies in problem-based learning) PhD-thesis. University of Limburg. Apeldoorn: Van Walraven BV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H.G. (1983). ‘Problem-based learning: Rationale and description’,Medical Education, 17, 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H.G. (1993). ‘Foundations of problem-based learning: Some explanatory notes’,Medical Education, 27, 422–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H.G. (in press) ‘Resolving inconsistencies in tutor expertise research: Lack of structure causes students to seek tutor guidance”,Academic Medicine.

  • Schmidt, H.G., Volder, M.L. de, Grave, W.S. de, Moust, H.C. and Patel, V.L. (1989). ‘Explanatory models in the processing of science text: The role of prior knowledge activation through small-group discussion’,Journal of Educational Research, 81, 610–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H.G., Van der Arend, A., Kokx I., & Boon, L. (1993a).Peer versus staff tutoring in problem-based learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Americal Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.

  • Schmidt, H.G., Van der Arend, A., Moust, J.H.C., Kokx, I., & Boon, L. (1993b). ‘Influence of tutors' subject-matter expertise on student effort and achievement in problem-based learning’,Academic Medicine, 68, 10, 784–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuell, T.J. (1988). ‘The role of the student in learning from instruction’,Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13, 276–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R.E. (1989). ‘Cooperative learning and student achievement’, in Slavin, R.E. (ed.),School and classroom organization, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 129–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volder, M.L. de, Grave, W.S. de and Gijselaers, W.H. (1985), ‘Peer teaching: Academic achievement of teacher-led versus student-led discussion groups’,Higher Education, 14, 643–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, L. (1982).Peer Teaching. Historical Perspectives. London: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, G. (1983) ‘The tutorial method. Learning strategies and student participation in tutortials: Some problems and suggested solutions’,Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 20, 117–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J.R. (1945). ‘Methods in engineering laboratory instruction’,Journal of Engineering education, 35, 50–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moust, J.C., Schmidt, H.G. Effects of staff and student tutors on student achievement. High Educ 28, 471–482 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383938

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383938

Keywords

Navigation