Abstract
In the problem-based curriculum of the faculty of Law, students of the first year are guided by staff tutors or undergraduate student tutors in small tutorial groups. In this study, academic achievement of staff tutor-guided groups are compared with student tutor-guided groups. After an eight-week course students' level of academic achievement was tested by essay questions. Two methods of assessing students' performance are used: expert judgements and propositional analysis. Results of both methods used indicate that no differences in academic achievement occur. Students guided by student tutors perform as well as students guided by staff tutors. Several explanations are proposed to account for these results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, V.L. (1976).Children as teachers. Theory and research on tutoring. New York: Academic Press.
Barrows, H.S. (1988).The tutorial process. Springfield (III.): Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
Beach, L.R. (1974). “Self-directed student groups and college learning”,Higher Education 3, 187–200.
Beach, L.R. (1983). ‘A report from America’, in Collier, K.G. (ed.),The management of peer group learning. Syndicate methods in Higher Education. (pp. 48–55) Guilford: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Bender, W. (1983). ‘Studenten de mond gesnoerd door autoriteit?’ (Students shut up by teachers' authority?),Bulletin Medisch Onderwijs, 2, 8–9.
Bloxom, B., Caul, W.F., Fristoe, M. and Thomson, W.J. (1975. ‘On the use of student-led discussion groups’,The Educational Forum, 39, 223–230.
Blunt, M.J. and Blizzard, P.J. (1973). ‘Development and initial assessment of a teaching-learning programme in anatomy’,British Journal of Medical Education, 7, 244–250.
Bromage, B.K. and R.E. Mayer (1981). ‘Relationship between what is remembered and creative problem-solving performance in science learning’,Journal of Education Psychology, 73, 451–461.
Carsrud, A.L. (1979). ‘Undergraduate tutors: Are they useful?’,Teaching of Psychology, 6, 46–49.
Cate, Th.J. ten (1986).Leren in groepen zonder docent. (Learning in groups without a teacher). PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.
Clement, D.E. (1971). ‘Learning and retention in student-led discussion groups’,The Journal of Social Psychology, 84, 279–286.
Coffman, W.E. (1971). ‘Essay Examinations’, in: Thorndike, R.L. (ed.),Educational Measurement. Washington D.C.: American Council on Education.
Collier, K.G. (1969). “Syndicate methods: Further evidence and comment’,Universities Quarterly, 23, 431–436.
Cronbach, L.J., Gleser, G.C., Nanda, H., and Rajaratnam, N. (1972).The dependability of behavioral measurements. Theory of generalizability of scores and profiles. New York: John Wiley.
Damon, W. and Phelps, E. (1989). ‘Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education’,International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 9–21.
Gijseleaers, W.H., Bouhuijs, P., Mulder, M. and Mullink, J. (1987).Rapport: Experiment student-tutoren blok 1.5 en blok 1.6. (Report: Experiment with student tutors in unit 1.5 and 1.6) FdEw-OC 87-237. Maastrict, The Netherlands: University of Limburg.
Grave, W.S. de, Volder, M.L. de, Gijselaers, W.H. and Damoiseaux, V. (1990). “Peer teaching and problem-based learning: Tutor characteristics, tutor functioning, group functioning and student-achievement”, in Nooman Z.N., Schmidt, H.G. and Ezzat, E.S. (eds.),Innovation in medical education. An evaluation of its present status. New York: Spring Publ. Co, pp. 123–135.
Gruppen, L.D., Traber, P., Paine, M.E., Woolliscroft, J.O. and Davis, W.K. (1992). ‘Tutor-led and student-led small groups: No differences in learning?’, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Hovey, D.E., Gruber, H.E., & Terrell, G. (1963). ‘Effects of self-directed study on course achievement, retention, and curiosity’,The Journal of Educational Research, 56, 345–351.
Mayer, R.E. (1985). ‘Structural analysis of science prose: Can we increase problem-solving performance?’, in Britton B.K. and Black, J.B. (eds.),Understanding expository text. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Meyer, B.J.F. (1975),The organization of prose and its effect on memory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Moust, J.H.C. (1993).De rol van tutoren in probleemgestuurd onderwijs. Contrasten tussen student-en docenttutoren. (On the role of tutors in problem-based learning: Contrasting student-guided with staff-guided tutorials.) PhD thesis. Datawyse/University Press. Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Moust, J.H.C. and Schmidt, H.G. (in press) ‘Facilitating small-group learning. A comparison of student and staff tutors' behavior’,International Journal of Educational Research.
Rudduck, J. (1978)Learning through small group discussion. A study of seminar work in higher education Guilford: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Schmidt, H.G. (1982).Activatie van voorkennis intrinsieke motivatie en de verwerking van tekst. Studies in probleemgestuurd onderwijs. (Activation of prior knowledge, intrinsic motivation and text processing. Studies in problem-based learning) PhD-thesis. University of Limburg. Apeldoorn: Van Walraven BV.
Schmidt, H.G. (1983). ‘Problem-based learning: Rationale and description’,Medical Education, 17, 11–16.
Schmidt, H.G. (1993). ‘Foundations of problem-based learning: Some explanatory notes’,Medical Education, 27, 422–432.
Schmidt, H.G. (in press) ‘Resolving inconsistencies in tutor expertise research: Lack of structure causes students to seek tutor guidance”,Academic Medicine.
Schmidt, H.G., Volder, M.L. de, Grave, W.S. de, Moust, H.C. and Patel, V.L. (1989). ‘Explanatory models in the processing of science text: The role of prior knowledge activation through small-group discussion’,Journal of Educational Research, 81, 610–619.
Schmidt, H.G., Van der Arend, A., Kokx I., & Boon, L. (1993a).Peer versus staff tutoring in problem-based learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Americal Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
Schmidt, H.G., Van der Arend, A., Moust, J.H.C., Kokx, I., & Boon, L. (1993b). ‘Influence of tutors' subject-matter expertise on student effort and achievement in problem-based learning’,Academic Medicine, 68, 10, 784–791.
Shuell, T.J. (1988). ‘The role of the student in learning from instruction’,Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13, 276–295.
Slavin, R.E. (1989). ‘Cooperative learning and student achievement’, in Slavin, R.E. (ed.),School and classroom organization, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 129–159.
Volder, M.L. de, Grave, W.S. de and Gijselaers, W.H. (1985), ‘Peer teaching: Academic achievement of teacher-led versus student-led discussion groups’,Higher Education, 14, 643–650.
Wagner, L. (1982).Peer Teaching. Historical Perspectives. London: Greenwood Press.
Webb, G. (1983) ‘The tutorial method. Learning strategies and student participation in tutortials: Some problems and suggested solutions’,Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 20, 117–121.
White, J.R. (1945). ‘Methods in engineering laboratory instruction’,Journal of Engineering education, 35, 50–54.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moust, J.C., Schmidt, H.G. Effects of staff and student tutors on student achievement. High Educ 28, 471–482 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383938
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383938