Skip to main content
Log in

The temporal dimension of gender inequality in academia

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines gender inequality in academic careers by applying Merton's concept of ‘socially expected durations’ (SEDs). Women's relatively slower advancement along the academic hierarchy has been traditionally attributed to their traits and constraints. The concept of SED shifts attention from the individual to the organizational level, and the actual and expected augmented durations between promotions for women are viewed as part of the structural arrangements of academic institutions and their culture. It is argued that because of the distinct characteristics of academic careers, time-in-rank is an important dimension distinguishing among otherwise very uniform occupational roles and career patterns. The implications of conceptualizing career discrepancies in terms of socially expected durations are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahern, C., and Scott, E.L. (1981).Career Outcomes in a Matched Sample of Men and Women Ph.D.s. Washington D.C.: CEEWISE, National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, H.S. (1985). ‘Research productivity across the life and career-cycles: facilitators and barriers for women’, in Fox, M.F. (ed.),Scholarly Writing and Publishing: Issues, Problems, and Solutions. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-David, J. (1982). ‘Universities’, in Ackerman, W., Carmon, A., and Zucker, D. (eds.),Education in Israel II. Stutgart: Ernst Klett (in German), pp. 363–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S.J., and Zelditch, M. Jr. (1980). ‘Status organizing processes’,Annual Review of Sociology 6, 479–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Wagner, D., and Zelditch, M. Jr. (1985). ‘Expectation states theory: review and assessment’, in Berger, J., and Zelditch, M. (eds.),Status, Rewards, and Influence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 1–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielby, D.D., and Bielby, W.T. (1988). ‘She works hard for the money: household responsibilities and the allocation of work effort’,American Journal of Sociology 93, 1031–1059.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P.M., and Scott, W.R. (1963).Formal Organizations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.R. (1987).The Academic Life: Small Worlds, Different Worlds. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J.R. (1979).Fair Science: Women in the Scientific Community. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J.R., and Zuckerman, H. (1984). ‘The productivity puzzle: persistence and change in patterns of publications of men and women scientists’, in Maehr, P., and Steinkamp, M.W. (eds.),Advances in Motivation and Achievement. Connecticut: JAI Press, pp. 217–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, M.J. (1984).The American Academic Profession. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M.F., and Faver, C.A. (1985). ‘Men, women, and publication productivity: patterns among social work academics’,Sociological Quarterly 26, 267–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., and Strauss, A.L. (1965). ‘Temporal aspects of dying as a non-scheduled status passage’,American Journal of Sociology 71, 48–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halaby, C.N. (1978). ‘Bureaucratic promotion criteria’,Administrative Science Quarterly 23, 466–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, H.H. (1987). ‘Internal labor markets and gender: a case study of promotion, in Brown, C., and Pechman, J.A. (eds.),Gender in the Workplace. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institute, pp. 59–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, A.B. (1977). ‘Climbing the academic ladder’, in Metzger, W.P. (ed.),Reader on the Sociology of the Academic Profession. New York: Arno Press, pp. 384–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyvik, S. (1990). ‘Motherhood and scientific productivity’,Social Studies of Science 20, 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P.F., and Thielens, W. Jr. (1958).The Academic Mind. Glenco: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, D. (1974). ‘The structure of the academic profession’,Sociology of Education 47, 2–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, S.J. (1978). ‘Productivity and academic position in the scientific career’,American Sociological Review 43, 889–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, S.J. (1990). ‘The origins of sex differences in science’,Social Forces 68, 1297–1315.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.C., and March, J.G. (1978). ‘Alimost random careers: the Wisconsin School Superintendency 1940–1972’,Administrative Science Quarterly 22, 377–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K. (1968). ‘The Matthew Effect in science’,Science 159(3810), 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K. (1984). ‘Socially expected durations: a case study of concept formation in sociology’, in Powell, W.W., and Robbins, R. (eds.),Conflict and Consensus: A Festschrift for Lewis A. Coser. New York: The Free Press, pp. 262–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K. (1988). ‘The Matthew Effect in science II, cumulative advantage and symbolism of intellectual property’,Isis 79, 606–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nvo-Ingber, J., and Ben-David, J. (1983). ‘The academic career in Israel: patterns of recruitment and promotion’. Jerusalem: National Council for Research and Development (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrucci, R., O'Flatherty, K., and Marshall, H. (1983). ‘Market conditions, productivity and promotion among university faculty’,Research in Higher Education 19, 431–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, J.E. (1984).Career Mobility in a Corporate Hierarchy. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, R.A. (1981). ‘Academic men and women's career mobility’,Social Science Research 10, 337–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, J.E. (1979).Timetables: Structuring the Passage of Time in Hospital Treatment and Other Careers. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R.S. (1991).Female Scholars and their Productivity. (unpublished manuscript).

  • Sofer, C. (1970).Men in Mid-Career: A Study of British Managers and Specialists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin, P.A., and Merton, R.K. (1937). ‘Social time: a methodological and functional analysis’,American Journal of Sociology 42, 615–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spilerman, S. (1977). ‘Careers, labor market structure, and socioeconomic achievement’,American Journal of Sociology 83, 551–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A.L. (1971).Professions, Work and Careers. San Francisco: The Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toren, N., and Kraus, V. (1987). ‘The effects of minority size on women's position in academia’,Social Forces 65, 1090–1100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toren, N., and Nvo-Ingber, J. (1989). ‘Organizational response to decline in the academic marketplace’,Higher Education 18, 149–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toren, N. (1991). ‘The nexus between family and work roles of women academics: reality and representation’,Sex Roles 24, 651–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, R.A., Lewis, L.S., and Gregorio, D.I. (1981). ‘Research productivity in academia: a comparative study of the sciences, social sciences and humanities’,Sociology of Education 54, 238–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1947).The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Translated by A.M. Henderson, and T. Parsons. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, L. (1979).American Academics Then and Now. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, E. (1979).Patterns of Time in Hospital Life: Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, H.H., and Cole, J.R. (1987). ‘Marriage, motherhood and research performance in science’,Scientific American 2, 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toren, N. The temporal dimension of gender inequality in academia. High Educ 25, 439–455 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383846

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383846

Keywords

Navigation