Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 431–447 | Cite as

Survivors in a male preserve: A study of British women academics' experiences and perceptions of discrimination in a UK university

  • Barbara Bagilhole
Article

Abstract

Women academics in British universities make up a very small minority and are concentrated in the lower grades. All the statistical evidence points to the fact that a reason for this situation is that discrimination exists in the academic profession. Howerver, very little empirical information exists on the nature of this discrimination and how it operates. The study reported here seeks to contribute to the understanding of this phenomenon by exploring the processes involved, through the perceptions and experience of women academics themselves. A total of 43 women from a British university were interviewed at length, and problem areas were highlighted by their evidence.

There is the problem of being in very small minorities functioning in a male environment. They suffer from isolation and exclusion from their male colleagues, and challenges to their authority from male students. They have fewer support systems, with few role models or mentors, and little access to communication networks. They report problems with work relationships, and experience hostility from male colleagues and students. The majority had experienced discrimination within the university. Finally, the effects of these factors on their perception of themselves as academics are explored. The majority become convinced that the concept of a women academic is problematic. This leads them to put pressure on themselves to perform better than male colleagues, and to avoid being identified with other women. They become ‘honorary men’ and as such are in no position to support other women.

Keywords

Communication Network Support System Lower Grade Role Model Male Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acker, S. (1983). ‘Women, the other academics’, in Duduwitz, R.L. (ed.),Women in Academe. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  2. Acker, S. (1992). ‘New perspectives on an old problem: the position of women academics in British higher education’,Higher Education 24, 57–75.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, H.F. (1983). ‘Work in the Interstices: women in academe’, in Duduwitz, R.L. (ed.),Women in Academe. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ainsberg, N., and Harrington, M. (1988).Women of academe: outsiders in the sacred grove. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  5. AUT (1992).Sex Discrimination in Universities: Report of an academic pay audit carried out by the AUT research departmentment. Association of University Teachers.Google Scholar
  6. Aziz, A. (1990). ‘Women in UK universities—the road to casualisation?’, in Lie, S.S., and O'Leary, V.E. (eds.),Storming the Tower; Women in the Academic World. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  7. Bardwick, J.M. (1977). ‘Some notes about power relationships among women’, in Sargent, A.G. (ed.),Beyond Sex Roles. St. Paul, MN: West.Google Scholar
  8. Blackstone, T., and Fulton, O., (1975). ‘Sex discrimination among university teachers: a British-American comparison’,British Journal of Sociology 26(30), 261–275.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, S.M., and Corcoran, M. (1986). ‘Perceptives on the professional socialization of women faculty: a case of cumulative disadvantage’,Journal of Higher Education 57, 20–43.Google Scholar
  10. CVCP (1991).Equal opportunities in employment in universities, Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals of the Universities of the United Kingdom, (CVCP guidance).Google Scholar
  11. Delamont, S. (1989).Knowledgeable Women: Structuralism and the Reproduction of Elites. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Dudovitz, R.L. (1983). Editorial in: Dudovitz op cit.Google Scholar
  13. Exum, W.H., Menges, R.J., Walkins, B., and Berglund, P. (1984). ‘Making at the top: women and minority faculty in the academic labor market’,American Behavioral scientist 27, 301–324.Google Scholar
  14. Halsey, A.H. (1992).Decline of Donnish Dominion: The British Professions in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hansard Society (1990). The Report of the Hansard Society Commission on Women at the Top. London: Hansard Society.Google Scholar
  16. Hart, A., and Wilson, T. (1992). ‘The politics of part-time staff’,AUT Bulletin, January 8–9.Google Scholar
  17. Hawkins, A.C., and Schultz, D. (1990). ‘Women: the academic proletariat in West Germany and the Netherlands’, in Lie, S.S., and O'Leary, V.E. op cit.Google Scholar
  18. Johnsrud, L.K., and Atwater, C.D. (1991).Barriers to Retention and Tenure at UH-Manoa: The Experiences of Faculty Cohorts 1982–1988. University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar
  19. Kanter, R.M. (1977).Men and Women of the Corporations. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  20. Kaufman, D.R. (1978). ‘Associational ties in academe: some male and female differences’,Sex Roles 4, 9–21.Google Scholar
  21. Kritek, P. (1984). ‘Women's work and academic sexism’,Educational Record 65, 56–57.Google Scholar
  22. Kulis, S. (1988). ‘The reporesentation of women in top ranked sociology departments’,The American Sociologist, 203–217.Google Scholar
  23. Laws, J.L. (1975). ‘The psychology of tokenism: an analysis,Sex Roles, 51–67.Google Scholar
  24. Lovano-Kerr, J., and Fuchs, R.G. (1983). ‘Retention revisited: a study of female and male nontenured faculty’,Journal of Educational Equity and Leadership 3, 219–230.Google Scholar
  25. Munroe, P. (1919).A Textbook in the History of Education. New York: Macmillan Co.New Internationalist, May 1992, 231.Google Scholar
  26. O'Leary, V.E., and Mitchell, J.M. (1990). ‘Women connecting with women: networks and mentors in the United States’, in Lie and O'Leary (eds.), op cit.Google Scholar
  27. Ross, A.M. (1992). ‘Two decades of higher education’,Higher Education 23, 99–112.Google Scholar
  28. Staines, G., Travis, C., and Jatrente, T. (1974). ‘The queen bee syndrome’,Psychology Today 7(8), 55–60.Google Scholar
  29. Sutherland, M. (1985).Women Who Teach in Universities. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  30. Yoder, J.D. (1985). ‘An academic woman as a token: a case study’,Journal of Social Issues 41, 61–72.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Bagilhole
    • 1
  1. 1.Lecturer in Social Policy, Director of Studies for MA in Women's Studies, Department of Social SciencesUniversity of LoughboroughEngland

Personalised recommendations