Abstract
Action research was used as a means of introducing adult learning principles into the teaching of an optometry department. The department took as an overall development theme the move from teacher-directed to leamer-directed activities. Pilot studies were used as a mechanism for trialling particular innovations. Lessons learnt from the pilot studies are shared with the remainder of the department for incorporation into other subjects, thus evolving a mechanism for departmental change. The paper shows how change occurred by reporting briefly two pilot studies as examples. The first used group project teams to prepare class presentations for specified topics. Some novel presentation methods were used by the student teams. Peer assessment was introduced into this subject in the second cycle of the pilot study as a result of feedback from the first cycle. The second pilot study introduced active learning methods in place of lectures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adderley, K. et al, (1975).Project Methods in Higher Education Guildford: SRHE.
Biggs, J. (1987).Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Biggs, J. (1989). ‘Approaches to the enhancement of tertiary teaching’,Higher Education Research and Development 8(1), 7–25.
Bruner, J.S. (1966).Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Busher, H. (1989). ‘Bringing out a new publication — the role of a catalyst in the micropolitics of the management of institutional change in education’,British Educational Research Journal 15(1), 77–87.
Conway, R. and Kember, D. (1993). ‘Effecting changes in the teaching of practice management’,Optometric Education, 18(4), 119–125.
Conway, R., Kember, D., Sivan, A. and Wu, M. (1993). ‘Peer assessment of an individual's contribution to a group project’,Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 18(1), 45–56.
Day, C. and Baskett, H.K. (1982). ‘Discrepancies between intentions and practice: Reexamining some basic assumptions about adult and continuing professional education’,International Journal of Lifelong Education, 1(2), 143–155.
Edwards M.H. (1989). ‘The development of optometry in Hong Kong’,Journal of Optometric Education 14(2), 42–45.
Eitington, J.E. (1989).The Winning Trainer. Houston: Gulf Publishing.
Goldfinch, J. and Raeside, R. (1990). ‘Development of a peer assessment technique for obtaining individual marks on a group project’,Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 15(3), 210–231.
Goldschmid, B. and Goldschmid, M.L. (1976). ‘Peer teaching in higher education: a review’,Higher Education 5, 9–33.
Goodlad, S. and Hirst, B. (1989).Peer Tutoring: A Guide to Learning by Teaching. London: Kogan Page.
Gow, L. and Kember, D. (1990). Does higher education promote independent learning?Higher Education 19, 307–322.
Habeshaw, S., Habeshaw, T. and Gibbs, G. (1988).53 Interesting Things To Do in Your Seminars and Tutorials. (4th edition) Bristol: Technical and Educational Services.
Hartree, A. (1984). ‘Malcolm Knowles theory of andragogy: a critique’International Journal of Lifelong Education, 3(3), 203–210.
Hughes J.M. (1987). ‘Managing by degree’,Production Management and Control Jan/Feb, 29–31.
Kember, D. and Gow, L. (1991). ‘A challenge to the anecdotal stereotype of the Asian student.Studies in Higher Education’ 16(2), 117–128.
Kember, D. and Gow, L. (1992). ‘Action research as a form of staff development in higher education’,Higher Education 23(3), 297–310.
Knowles, M. (1970).Modern Practice of Adult Education: Andragogy vs Pedagogy. New York: Association Press.
Knowles, M. (1984),The Adult Learner — A Neglected Species. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.
Knowles, M. (1990),The Adult Learner — A Neglected Species 4th Edition. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.
Lewin, K. (1946), ‘Action research and minority problems’,Journal of Social Issues 2, 34–46.
Lewin, K. (1952). ‘Group decision and social change’, in Swanson, G.E., Newcomb, T.M. and Hartley, F.E. (eds.),Readings in Social Psychology. New York: Holt, pp. 459–473.
Marton, F. and Ramsden, P. (1988). ‘What does it take to improve learning?’, in Ramsden, P. (ed.),Improving Learning: New Perspectives. London: Rogan Page, pp. 268–286.
McKenzie, L. (1977). The issue of andragogy.Adult Education, 27, 4, 225–229.
Nussenblatt H., Troeger C. (1988). ‘New directions in practice management: A model curriculum for optometry colleges’,Journal of Optometric Education 13(3), 79–82.
Pratt, D.D. (1984). Andragogical assumptions: some counter-intuitive logic.Proceedings of the Adult Educaton Research Conference, No. 25, Raleigh: North Carolina State University.
Rogers, C. (1969).Freedom to Learn. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill.
Schratz, M. (1992). ‘Researching while teaching: an action research approach in higher education’,Studies in Higher Education 17(1), 81–95.
Stenhouse, L. (1975).An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heinemann Education.
Tighe, M.J. (1971). ‘Creative dialogue: Teaching students to teach themselves’,New Directions in Teaching 2, 4.
Williams, R. (1991). ‘Evaluating self reports of action research in changing educational institutions: a response to Hugh Busher’,British Educational Research Journal 17(3), 237–247.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Conway, R., Kember, D., Sivan, A. et al. Making departmental changes through action research, based on adult learning principles. High Educ 28, 265–282 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383732
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383732