Skip to main content
Log in

Making departmental changes through action research, based on adult learning principles

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Action research was used as a means of introducing adult learning principles into the teaching of an optometry department. The department took as an overall development theme the move from teacher-directed to leamer-directed activities. Pilot studies were used as a mechanism for trialling particular innovations. Lessons learnt from the pilot studies are shared with the remainder of the department for incorporation into other subjects, thus evolving a mechanism for departmental change. The paper shows how change occurred by reporting briefly two pilot studies as examples. The first used group project teams to prepare class presentations for specified topics. Some novel presentation methods were used by the student teams. Peer assessment was introduced into this subject in the second cycle of the pilot study as a result of feedback from the first cycle. The second pilot study introduced active learning methods in place of lectures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adderley, K. et al, (1975).Project Methods in Higher Education Guildford: SRHE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (1987).Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (1989). ‘Approaches to the enhancement of tertiary teaching’,Higher Education Research and Development 8(1), 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J.S. (1966).Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busher, H. (1989). ‘Bringing out a new publication — the role of a catalyst in the micropolitics of the management of institutional change in education’,British Educational Research Journal 15(1), 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, R. and Kember, D. (1993). ‘Effecting changes in the teaching of practice management’,Optometric Education, 18(4), 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, R., Kember, D., Sivan, A. and Wu, M. (1993). ‘Peer assessment of an individual's contribution to a group project’,Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 18(1), 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, C. and Baskett, H.K. (1982). ‘Discrepancies between intentions and practice: Reexamining some basic assumptions about adult and continuing professional education’,International Journal of Lifelong Education, 1(2), 143–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards M.H. (1989). ‘The development of optometry in Hong Kong’,Journal of Optometric Education 14(2), 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eitington, J.E. (1989).The Winning Trainer. Houston: Gulf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfinch, J. and Raeside, R. (1990). ‘Development of a peer assessment technique for obtaining individual marks on a group project’,Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 15(3), 210–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmid, B. and Goldschmid, M.L. (1976). ‘Peer teaching in higher education: a review’,Higher Education 5, 9–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, S. and Hirst, B. (1989).Peer Tutoring: A Guide to Learning by Teaching. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gow, L. and Kember, D. (1990). Does higher education promote independent learning?Higher Education 19, 307–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habeshaw, S., Habeshaw, T. and Gibbs, G. (1988).53 Interesting Things To Do in Your Seminars and Tutorials. (4th edition) Bristol: Technical and Educational Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartree, A. (1984). ‘Malcolm Knowles theory of andragogy: a critique’International Journal of Lifelong Education, 3(3), 203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes J.M. (1987). ‘Managing by degree’,Production Management and Control Jan/Feb, 29–31.

  • Kember, D. and Gow, L. (1991). ‘A challenge to the anecdotal stereotype of the Asian student.Studies in Higher Education’ 16(2), 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D. and Gow, L. (1992). ‘Action research as a form of staff development in higher education’,Higher Education 23(3), 297–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. (1970).Modern Practice of Adult Education: Andragogy vs Pedagogy. New York: Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. (1984),The Adult Learner — A Neglected Species. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. (1990),The Adult Learner — A Neglected Species 4th Edition. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1946), ‘Action research and minority problems’,Journal of Social Issues 2, 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1952). ‘Group decision and social change’, in Swanson, G.E., Newcomb, T.M. and Hartley, F.E. (eds.),Readings in Social Psychology. New York: Holt, pp. 459–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. and Ramsden, P. (1988). ‘What does it take to improve learning?’, in Ramsden, P. (ed.),Improving Learning: New Perspectives. London: Rogan Page, pp. 268–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, L. (1977). The issue of andragogy.Adult Education, 27, 4, 225–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussenblatt H., Troeger C. (1988). ‘New directions in practice management: A model curriculum for optometry colleges’,Journal of Optometric Education 13(3), 79–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, D.D. (1984). Andragogical assumptions: some counter-intuitive logic.Proceedings of the Adult Educaton Research Conference, No. 25, Raleigh: North Carolina State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. (1969).Freedom to Learn. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schratz, M. (1992). ‘Researching while teaching: an action research approach in higher education’,Studies in Higher Education 17(1), 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse, L. (1975).An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heinemann Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tighe, M.J. (1971). ‘Creative dialogue: Teaching students to teach themselves’,New Directions in Teaching 2, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1991). ‘Evaluating self reports of action research in changing educational institutions: a response to Hugh Busher’,British Educational Research Journal 17(3), 237–247.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conway, R., Kember, D., Sivan, A. et al. Making departmental changes through action research, based on adult learning principles. High Educ 28, 265–282 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383732

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383732

Keywords

Navigation