Skip to main content
Log in

Teaching and research. The relationship between the supervision of graduate students and faculty research performance

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between the supervision of graduate students and university faculty research performance. We find that the supervision of Ph.D. students who have projects related to their supervisor's research has an independent effect on faculty members' scientific productivity in the natural and medical sciences and technology, but not in the humanities and social sciences. The relationship between the supervision of project related major subject students and the faculty members' productivity is only significant in the social sciences. These results are generally supported by data on faculty attitudes toward the supervision of graduate students. Those who supervised Ph.D. students gave a considerably more favourable assessment of the importance of supervision for their own research than those who only supervised major subject students, and the proportion of faculty members who answered that supervision of Ph.D. students was part of their own research to a great extent, was very much higher in the natural and medical sciences and technology than in the humanities and social sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnett, R. (1992). ‘Linking teaching and research’,Journal of Higher Education 63, 619–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T. (1989).Academic Tribes and Territories. Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Milton Keynes: SRHE/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, B. (1960).Graduate Education in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. T., Behymer, C. E. and Hall, D. E. (1978), ‘Research Note: Correlates of Faculty Publications”.Sociology of Education 51, 132–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, L. (1986). ‘Research and teaching: symbiosis or conflict’.Higher Education 15, 299–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagstrom, W. O. (1965).The Scientific Community. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H. F. and Jensen, H. M. (1985). ‘Undervisningens betydning for forskning, illustrert ved forskeres selvoplevelse’. In Fivelsdal, E. (ed.),Nœrbilleder af forskning, København: Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne, 107–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargens, L. L. (1975).Patterns of Scientific Research. A Comparative Analysis of Research in Three Scientific Fields. Washington D.C.: American Sociological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellert, C., Leitner, E. and Schramm, J. (eds.) (1990).Research and Teaching at Universities. Frankfurt and Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. J. (1986).Forskning og undervisning på universitene, Et samspil? Esbjerg: Sydjysk Universitetsforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr, K. D., Mittermeir, R., Aichholzer, G. and Waller, G. (1979). ‘Individual Publication Productivity as a Social Position Effect in Academic and Industrial Research Units’. In Andrews, F. M. (ed.),Scientific Productivity. The Effectiveness of Research Groups in Six Countries. Cambridge/Paris: Cambridge University Press/UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyvik, S. (1984). ‘Hovedfagsoppgavenes plass og funksjon i forskningsprosessen ved universitetene’. In Skotheim, S. and Utne, E. (eds.),Forskning og høgre utdanning. Årbok 1983. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyvik, S. (1986). ‘Postgraduate Education in Norway,’.European Journal of Education 21, 251–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyvik, S. (1991).Productivity in Academia. Scientific Publishing at Norwegian Universities. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labovitz, S. (1970). ‘The Assignment of Numbers to Rank Order Categories’.American Sociological Review 35, 515–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindbekk, T. (1969).Forskningsorganisasjon innen moderne vitenskap. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodahl, J. B. and Gordon, G. (1972). ‘The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Functioning of University Graduate Departments’.American Sociological Review, 37, 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, R. (1992). “Perceptions of the Teaching-Research Nexus. A Framework for Analyses’.Higher Education 23, 159–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelz, D. C. and Andrews, F. M. (1966).Scientists in Organizations. Productive Climates for Research and Development. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. de Solla and Beaver, D. B. (1966). “Collaboration in an Invisible College”.American Psychologist 21, 1011–1018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. and Moses, I. (1992). “Associations between Research and Teaching in Australian Higher Education’.Higher Education 23, 273–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeby, J. C. (1993).Unpublished manuscript. Oslo: Institute for Studies in Research and Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1978).Recommendation Concerning the International Standardization of Statistics on Science and Technology. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (1984).The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kyvik, S., Smeby, JC. Teaching and research. The relationship between the supervision of graduate students and faculty research performance. High Educ 28, 227–239 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383730

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383730

Keywords

Navigation