Abstract
This article examines the relationship between the supervision of graduate students and university faculty research performance. We find that the supervision of Ph.D. students who have projects related to their supervisor's research has an independent effect on faculty members' scientific productivity in the natural and medical sciences and technology, but not in the humanities and social sciences. The relationship between the supervision of project related major subject students and the faculty members' productivity is only significant in the social sciences. These results are generally supported by data on faculty attitudes toward the supervision of graduate students. Those who supervised Ph.D. students gave a considerably more favourable assessment of the importance of supervision for their own research than those who only supervised major subject students, and the proportion of faculty members who answered that supervision of Ph.D. students was part of their own research to a great extent, was very much higher in the natural and medical sciences and technology than in the humanities and social sciences.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnett, R. (1992). ‘Linking teaching and research’,Journal of Higher Education 63, 619–636.
Becher, T. (1989).Academic Tribes and Territories. Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Milton Keynes: SRHE/Open University Press.
Berelson, B. (1960).Graduate Education in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Blackburn, R. T., Behymer, C. E. and Hall, D. E. (1978), ‘Research Note: Correlates of Faculty Publications”.Sociology of Education 51, 132–141.
Elton, L. (1986). ‘Research and teaching: symbiosis or conflict’.Higher Education 15, 299–304.
Hagstrom, W. O. (1965).The Scientific Community. New York: Basic Books.
Hansen, H. F. and Jensen, H. M. (1985). ‘Undervisningens betydning for forskning, illustrert ved forskeres selvoplevelse’. In Fivelsdal, E. (ed.),Nœrbilleder af forskning, København: Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne, 107–158.
Hargens, L. L. (1975).Patterns of Scientific Research. A Comparative Analysis of Research in Three Scientific Fields. Washington D.C.: American Sociological Association.
Gellert, C., Leitner, E. and Schramm, J. (eds.) (1990).Research and Teaching at Universities. Frankfurt and Main: Peter Lang.
Jensen, J. J. (1986).Forskning og undervisning på universitene, Et samspil? Esbjerg: Sydjysk Universitetsforlag.
Knorr, K. D., Mittermeir, R., Aichholzer, G. and Waller, G. (1979). ‘Individual Publication Productivity as a Social Position Effect in Academic and Industrial Research Units’. In Andrews, F. M. (ed.),Scientific Productivity. The Effectiveness of Research Groups in Six Countries. Cambridge/Paris: Cambridge University Press/UNESCO.
Kyvik, S. (1984). ‘Hovedfagsoppgavenes plass og funksjon i forskningsprosessen ved universitetene’. In Skotheim, S. and Utne, E. (eds.),Forskning og høgre utdanning. Årbok 1983. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
Kyvik, S. (1986). ‘Postgraduate Education in Norway,’.European Journal of Education 21, 251–260.
Kyvik, S. (1991).Productivity in Academia. Scientific Publishing at Norwegian Universities. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
Labovitz, S. (1970). ‘The Assignment of Numbers to Rank Order Categories’.American Sociological Review 35, 515–524.
Lindbekk, T. (1969).Forskningsorganisasjon innen moderne vitenskap. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
Lodahl, J. B. and Gordon, G. (1972). ‘The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Functioning of University Graduate Departments’.American Sociological Review, 37, 57–72.
Neumann, R. (1992). “Perceptions of the Teaching-Research Nexus. A Framework for Analyses’.Higher Education 23, 159–171.
Pelz, D. C. and Andrews, F. M. (1966).Scientists in Organizations. Productive Climates for Research and Development. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Price, D. J. de Solla and Beaver, D. B. (1966). “Collaboration in an Invisible College”.American Psychologist 21, 1011–1018.
Ramsden, P. and Moses, I. (1992). “Associations between Research and Teaching in Australian Higher Education’.Higher Education 23, 273–295.
Smeby, J. C. (1993).Unpublished manuscript. Oslo: Institute for Studies in Research and Higher Education.
UNESCO (1978).Recommendation Concerning the International Standardization of Statistics on Science and Technology. Paris: UNESCO.
Whitley, R. (1984).The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kyvik, S., Smeby, JC. Teaching and research. The relationship between the supervision of graduate students and faculty research performance. High Educ 28, 227–239 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383730
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383730