Abstract
This article describes results from a study of academic productivity in Australian higher education. It estimates the output (in terms of quantity of publications) of individual staff and academic departments across different subject areas and types of institution. Concerning research productivity, Australian academics resemble their colleagues in other countries: the average is low, while the range of variation is high. Most papers are produced by few academic staff. Several potential correlates of productivity, including level of research activity, subject area, institutional type, gender, age, early interest in research, and satisfaction with the promotions system, are examined. A model linking departmental context to personal research performance through department and personal research activity is developed and tested. The results support the view that structural factors (such as how academic departments are managed and led) combine with personal variables (such as intrinsic interest in the subject matter of one's discipline) to determine levels of productivity. There is also evidence that research and teaching do not form a single dimension of academic performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baird, L.L. (1986). ‘What characterizes a productive research department?’,Research in Higher Education 25, 211–225.
Bentley, R., and Blackburn, R. (1990). ‘Changes in academic research performance over time: a study of institutional cumulative advantage’,Research in Higher Education 31, 327–351.
Biggs, J.B. (1991). ‘Teaching: design for learning’, in Ross, R. (ed.),Research and Development in Higher Education 13, Sydney: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia.
Blackburn, R.T., Behymer, C.D., and Hall, D.E., (1978). ‘Research note: correlates of faculty publications’,Sociology of Education 51, 132–141.
Blackburn, R.T., Bieber, J.P., Lawrence, J.H., and Trautvetter, L. (1991). ‘Faculty at work: focus on research, scholarship and service’,Research in Higher Education 32, 385–413.
Bland, C.J., and Ruffin, M.T. (1992). ‘Characteristics of a productive research environment: literature review’,Academic Medicine 67(6), 385–397.
Blume, S.S., and Sinclair, R. (1973). ‘Chemists in British universities: a study of the reward system in science’,American Sociological Review 38, 126–138.
Bourke, P. (1991). ‘A bibliometric profile of research in the Institute of Advanced Studies, ANU, 1976–1988’, in Linke, R.D. (ed.),Performance Indicators in Higher Education: Report of a Trial Evaluation Study Commisioned by the Commonwealth Department of Employment, Education and Training. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Boyes, W.J., Happel, S.K., and Hogen, T.D. (1984). ‘Publish or perish: fact or fiction?’,Journal of Economic Education 15, 136–141.
Cole, J.R. (1979).Fair Science: Women in the Scientific Community. New York: Free Press.
Creswell, J.H. (1985).Faculty Research Performance: Lessons from the Sciences and Social Sciences. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 7. Washington, D.C.: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
Daniel, H.-D., and Fisch, R. (1990). ‘Research performance evaluation in the German university sector’,Scientometrics 19, 349–361.
Department of Employment, Education and Training (1989).Discipline Review of Teacher Education in Mathematics and Science. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Elsworth, G. (1992). ‘Connoisseur evaluation and performance indicators in higher education: biased paradigms or complementary methods?’. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Comparative and International Education Society, Annapolis.
Entwistle, N.J., and Ramsden, P. (1983).Understanding Student Learning. London: Croom Helm.
Feldman, K.A. (1987). ‘Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: a review and exploration’,Research in Higher Education 26, 227–297.
Fox, M.F. (1983). ‘Publication productivity among scientists: a critical review’,Social Studies of Science 13, 285–305.
Fox, M.F. (1992a) ‘Research, teaching, and publication productivity: mutuality versus competition in academia’,Sociology of Education 65, 293–305.
Fox, M.F. (1992b) ‘Research productivity and environmental context’, in Whiston, T.G., and Geiger, R.L. (eds.),Research and Higher Education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
Gillett, R. (1989). ‘Research performance indicators based on peer review: a critical analysis’,Higher Education Quarterly 43, 20–38.
Halsey, A.H. (1980).Higher Education in Britain—A Study of University and Polytechnic Teachers. Final Report on SSRC Grant.
Harris, G.T. (1990). ‘Research output in Australian university economics departments: an update for 1984–88’,Australian Economic Papers 29(55), 249–259.
Hunter, D.E., and Kuh, G.D. (1987). ‘The “write wing”: characteristics of prolific contributors to the higher education literature’,Journal of Higher Education 58(4), 443–462.
Ladd, E.C., and Lipset, S.M. (1978).Technical Report, 1977 Survey of the American Professoriate. Storrs: Social Science Data Center, University of Connecticut.
Linke, R.D. (1991).Performance Indicators in Higher Education: Report of a Trial Evaluation Study Commissioned by the Commonwealth Department of Employment, Education and Training. Volume 1: Report and Recommendations. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Long, J.S. (1978). ‘Productivity and academic position in the scientific career’,American Sociological Review 43, 889–908.
Long, J.S., and McGinnis, R. (1981). ‘Organizational context and scientific productivity’,American Sociological Review 46, 422–442.
Lotka, A.J. (1926). ‘The frequency distribution of scientific productivity’,Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 16, 317.
Martin, B.R., and Irvine, J. (1981). ‘Internal criteria for scientific choice: an evaluation of research in high-energy physics using electron accelerators’,Minerva 19, 408–432.
Martin, B.R., and Irvine, J. (1983). ‘Assessing basic research: some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy’,Research Policy, 12, 61–90.
Moses, I., and Ramsden, P. (1991). ‘Academics and academic work in colleges of advanced education and universities’. Paper presented at the Conference on “25 Years After the Martin Report”, University of New England, February 1991.
Price, D.J. (1986).Little Science, Big Science ... and Beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ramsden, P., and Entwistle, N.J. (1981). ‘Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to studying’,British Journal of Educational Psychology 51, 368–383.
Ramsden, P., and Moses, I. (1992). ‘Associations between research and teaching in Australian higher education’,Higher Education 23, 273–295.
O'Neill, G.P. (1990). ‘Publish or perish: dispelling the myth’,Higher Education Review 23, 55–62.
Reskin, B.F. (1977). ‘Scientific productivity and the reward structure of science’,American Sociological Review 42, 491–504.
West, L.H.T., Hore, T., and Boon, P.K. (1980). ‘Publication rates and productivity’,Vestes 23, 32–37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramsden, P. Describing and explaining research productivity. High Educ 28, 207–226 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383729
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383729